180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26640521)
1. Effectiveness of managed gene flow in reducing genetic divergence associated with captive breeding.
Waters CD; Hard JJ; Brieuc MS; Fast DE; Warheit KI; Waples RS; Knudsen CM; Bosch WJ; Naish KA
Evol Appl; 2015 Dec; 8(10):956-71. PubMed ID: 26640521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomewide association analyses of fitness traits in captive-reared Chinook salmon: Applications in evaluating conservation strategies.
Waters CD; Hard JJ; Brieuc MSO; Fast DE; Warheit KI; Knudsen CM; Bosch WJ; Naish KA
Evol Appl; 2018 Jul; 11(6):853-868. PubMed ID: 29928295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomic and phenotypic effects of inbreeding across two different hatchery management regimes in Chinook salmon.
Waters CD; Hard JJ; Fast DE; Knudsen CM; Bosch WJ; Naish KA
Mol Ecol; 2020 Feb; 29(4):658-672. PubMed ID: 31957935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How well can captive breeding programs conserve biodiversity? A review of salmonids.
Fraser DJ
Evol Appl; 2008 Nov; 1(4):535-86. PubMed ID: 25567798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term demographic and genetic effects of releasing captive-born individuals into the wild.
Willoughby JR; Christie MR
Conserv Biol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):377-388. PubMed ID: 30168872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Carry-over effect of captive breeding reduces reproductive fitness of wild-born descendants in the wild.
Araki H; Cooper B; Blouin MS
Biol Lett; 2009 Oct; 5(5):621-4. PubMed ID: 19515651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimates of natural selection in a salmon population in captive and natural environments.
Ford MJ; Hard JJ; Boelts B; LaHood E; Miller J
Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):783-94. PubMed ID: 18577092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Captive Ancestry Upwardly Biases Estimates of Relative Reproductive Success.
Willoughby JR; Christie MR
J Hered; 2017 Jul; 108(5):583-587. PubMed ID: 28499014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maintaining a wild phenotype in a conservation hatchery program for Chinook salmon: The effect of managed breeding on early male maturation.
Larsen DA; Harstad DL; Fuhrman AE; Knudsen CM; Schroder SL; Bosch WJ; Galbreath PF; Fast DE; Beckman BR
PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216168. PubMed ID: 31091265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic effects of long-term captive breeding on the endangered pygmy hog.
Purohit D; Manu S; Ram MS; Sharma S; Patnaik HC; Deka PJ; Narayan G; Umapathy G
PeerJ; 2021; 9():e12212. PubMed ID: 34707930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild.
Araki H; Cooper B; Blouin MS
Science; 2007 Oct; 318(5847):100-3. PubMed ID: 17916734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Domestication of captive-bred masu salmon Oncorhynchus masou masou (Salmonidae) leads to a significant decrease in numbers of lateral line organs.
Nakae M; Hasegawa K; Miyamoto K
Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):16780. PubMed ID: 36202921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adaptive genetic markers discriminate migratory runs of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) amid continued gene flow.
O'Malley KG; Jacobson DP; Kurth R; Dill AJ; Banks MA
Evol Appl; 2013 Dec; 6(8):1184-94. PubMed ID: 24478800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the performance of captive breeding techniques for conservation hatcheries: a case study of the delta smelt captive breeding program.
Fisch KM; Ivy JA; Burton RS; May B
J Hered; 2013; 104(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 23125405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of domestication and captive breeding on reaction to moving objects: implications for avoidance behaviours of masu salmon
Hasegawa K; Nakae M; Miyamoto K
R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Apr; 10(4):230045. PubMed ID: 37122951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pedigree analysis reveals a generational decline in reproductive success of captive Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii): implications for captive management of threatened species.
Farquharson KA; Hogg CJ; Grueber CE
J Hered; 2017 Jul; 108(5):488-495. PubMed ID: 28379457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assortative mating among animals of captive and wild origin following experimental conservation releases.
Slade B; Parrott ML; Paproth A; Magrath MJ; Gillespie GR; Jessop TS
Biol Lett; 2014 Nov; 10(11):20140656. PubMed ID: 25411380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel holistic framework for genetic-based captive-breeding and reintroduction programs.
Attard CR; Möller LM; Sasaki M; Hammer MP; Bice CM; Brauer CJ; Carvalho DC; Harris JO; Beheregaray LB
Conserv Biol; 2016 Oct; 30(5):1060-9. PubMed ID: 26892747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Captive breeding does not alter brain volume in a marsupial over a few generations.
Guay PJ; Parrott M; Selwood L
Zoo Biol; 2012; 31(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 23900892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetic guidelines for captive breeding and reintroductions of the endangered Black-fronted Piping Guan, Aburria jacutinga (galliformes, cracidae), an Atlantic Forest endemic.
Oliveira PR; Costa MC; Silveira LF; Francisco MR
Zoo Biol; 2016 Jul; 35(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 27232628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
