These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26641447)

  • 1. Is VIRTU4L larger than VIR7UAL? Automatic processing of number quantity and lexical representations in leet words.
    García-Orza J; Comesaña M; Piñeiro A; Soares AP; Perea M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):855-65. PubMed ID: 26641447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Word Frequency Effects for LEET Lettering in Word Recognition.
    Grabbe JW
    Am J Psychol; 2016; 129(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 27029105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. R34D1NG W0RD5 W1TH NUMB3R5.
    Perea M; Duñabeitia JA; Carreiras M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):237-41. PubMed ID: 18248151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing visual words with numbers: electrophysiological evidence for semantic activation.
    Lien MC; Allen P; Martin N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Aug; 21(4):1056-66. PubMed ID: 24436053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Markers of automaticity in sleep-associated consolidation of novel words.
    Tham EK; Lindsay S; Gaskell MG
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 May; 71():146-57. PubMed ID: 25817848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is place-value processing in four-digit numbers fully automatic? Yes, but not always.
    García-Orza J; Estudillo AJ; Calleja M; Rodríguez JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1906-1914. PubMed ID: 28138835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The number of letters in number words influences the response time in numerical comparison tasks: Evidence using Korean number words.
    Kwon D; Oh S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2612-2618. PubMed ID: 31605301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Activation of lexical and semantic representations without intention along GPC-sublexical and orthographic-lexical reading pathways in a Stroop paradigm.
    Anton KF; Gould L; Borowsky R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):623-44. PubMed ID: 24294918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is orthographic information from multiple parafoveal words processed in parallel: An eye-tracking study.
    Cutter MG; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1550-1567. PubMed ID: 28383965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is an ant larger than a lion?
    Rubinsten O; Henik A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2002 Jul; 111(1):141-54. PubMed ID: 12102118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic and intentional processing of numerical order and its relationship to arithmetic performance.
    Vogel SE; Koren N; Falb S; Haselwander M; Spradley A; Schadenbauer P; Tanzmeister S; Grabner RH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():30-41. PubMed ID: 30584972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural correlates of distance and congruity effects in a numerical Stroop task: an event-related fMRI study.
    Kaufmann L; Koppelstaetter F; Delazer M; Siedentopf C; Rhomberg P; Golaszewski S; Felber S; Ischebeck A
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):888-98. PubMed ID: 15808989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Arabic digits and spoken number words: Timing modulates the cross-modal numerical distance effect.
    Lin CY; Göbel SM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Nov; 72(11):2632-2646. PubMed ID: 31096864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Misperception of orthographic neighbors during silent and oral reading.
    Gregg J; Inhoff AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jun; 42(6):799-820. PubMed ID: 26727017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition.
    Schvaneveldt RW; Meyer DE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 1271030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Holistic word processing is correlated with efficiency in visual word recognition.
    Ventura P; Fernandes T; Pereira A; Guerreiro JC; Farinha-Fernandes A; Delgado J; Ferreira MF; Faustino B; Raposo I; Wong AC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2739-2750. PubMed ID: 32077067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms.
    Peleg O; Edelist L; Eviatar Z; Bergerbest D
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):519-37. PubMed ID: 26637339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is there a genuine advantage to the upper part of words during lexical access? Evidence from the Stroop task.
    Tejero P; Perea M; Jiménez M
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jul; 42(5):834-41. PubMed ID: 24408533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which digit is larger? Brain responses to number and size interactions in a numerical Stroop task.
    Huang HW; Nascimben M; Wang YY; Fong DY; Tzeng OJ; Huang CM
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Mar; 58(3):e13744. PubMed ID: 33314155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The numerical stroop effect in primary school children: a comparison of low, normal, and high achievers.
    Heine A; Tamm S; De Smedt B; Schneider M; Thaler V; Torbeyns J; Stern E; Verschaffel L; Jacobs A
    Child Neuropsychol; 2010; 16(5):461-77. PubMed ID: 20437281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.