These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26641449)

  • 1. Phonotactic constraints: Implications for models of oral reading in Russian.
    Ulicheva A; Coltheart M; Saunders S; Perry C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(4):636-56. PubMed ID: 26641449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The locus of serial processing in reading aloud: orthography-to-phonology computation or speech planning?
    Mousikou P; Rastle K; Besner D; Coltheart M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1076-99. PubMed ID: 25528095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonword reading: comparing dual-route cascaded and connectionist dual-process models with human data.
    Pritchard SC; Coltheart M; Palethorpe S; Castles A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1268-88. PubMed ID: 22309087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthography affects second language speech: Double letters and geminate production in English.
    Bassetti B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1835-1842. PubMed ID: 28504532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some neurophysiological constraints on models of word naming.
    Binder JR; Medler DA; Desai R; Conant LL; Liebenthal E
    Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):677-93. PubMed ID: 15921937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling the contribution of phonotactic cues to the problem of word segmentation.
    Blanchard D; Heinz J; Golinkoff R
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):487-511. PubMed ID: 20307346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phonotactic probabilities at the onset of language development: speech production and word position.
    Zamuner TS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 52(1):49-60. PubMed ID: 18723600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of phonological features on reading-aloud latencies: A cross-linguistic comparison.
    Ulicheva A; Roon KD; Cherkasova Z; Mousikou P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Sep; 48(9):1348-1362. PubMed ID: 33734728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond single syllables: large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model.
    Perry C; Ziegler JC; Zorzi M
    Cogn Psychol; 2010 Sep; 61(2):106-51. PubMed ID: 20510406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonetic, phonemic, and phonological factors in cross-language discrimination of phonotactic contrasts.
    Davidson L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):270-82. PubMed ID: 21090904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of Cyrillic on Native English Speakers' Phono-lexical Acquisition of Russian.
    Showalter CE
    Lang Speech; 2018 Dec; 61(4):565-576. PubMed ID: 29577805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Graphemes are used when reading: Evidence from Monte Carlo simulation using word norms from mega-studies.
    Perry C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Feb; 76(2):419-428. PubMed ID: 35212256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: effects of phonotactic probability and onset density.
    Vitevitch MS; Armbruster J; Chu S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):514-29. PubMed ID: 14979821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Letter processing in Russian: Does orthography matter?
    Alexeeva S; Dobrego A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Jul; 218():103355. PubMed ID: 34144491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.
    Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two distinct parsing stages in nonword reading aloud: Evidence from Russian.
    Schmalz X; Porshnev A; Marinus E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2548-2559. PubMed ID: 27737619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can connectionist models of phonology assembly account for phonology?
    Berent I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Dec; 8(4):661-76. PubMed ID: 11848584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New phonotactic constraints learned implicitly by producing syllable strings generalize to the production of new syllables.
    Warker JA; Dell GS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1902-10. PubMed ID: 26030628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variation in the speech signal as a window into the cognitive architecture of language production.
    Bürki A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):1973-2004. PubMed ID: 29383571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reading aloud is not automatic: processing capacity is required to generate a phonological code from print.
    Reynolds M; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1303-23. PubMed ID: 17154774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.