These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26641508)

  • 21. Comparison of some representative density functional theory and wave function theory methods for the studies of amino acids.
    Yu W; Liang L; Lin Z; Ling S; Haranczyk M; Gutowski M
    J Comput Chem; 2009 Mar; 30(4):589-600. PubMed ID: 18711717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Benchmarking density functional methods against the S66 and S66x8 datasets for non-covalent interactions.
    Goerigk L; Kruse H; Grimme S
    Chemphyschem; 2011 Dec; 12(17):3421-33. PubMed ID: 22113958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of aromatic NH···π, OH···π, and CH···π interactions of alanine using MP2, CCSD, and DFT methods.
    Mohan N; Vijayalakshmi KP; Koga N; Suresh CH
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Dec; 31(16):2874-82. PubMed ID: 20928850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. "Mindless" DFT Benchmarking.
    Korth M; Grimme S
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2009 Apr; 5(4):993-1003. PubMed ID: 26609608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Density Functionals for Noncovalent Interaction Energies of Biological Importance.
    Zhao Y; Truhlar DG
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2007 Jan; 3(1):289-300. PubMed ID: 26627172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of Model Chemistries for Noncovalent Interactions.
    Zhao Y; Truhlar DG
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2006 Jul; 2(4):1009-18. PubMed ID: 26633060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Performance of the DLPNO-CCSD and recent DFT methods in the calculation of isotropic and dipolar contributions to
    Gromov OI
    J Mol Model; 2021 Jun; 27(6):194. PubMed ID: 34075533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ion-pair binding energies of ionic liquids: can DFT compete with ab initio-based methods?
    Izgorodina EI; Bernard UL; MacFarlane DR
    J Phys Chem A; 2009 Jun; 113(25):7064-72. PubMed ID: 19462960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Calculations on noncovalent interactions and databases of benchmark interaction energies.
    Hobza P
    Acc Chem Res; 2012 Apr; 45(4):663-72. PubMed ID: 22225511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Benchmarking of DFT Functionals for the Hydrolysis of Phosphodiester Bonds.
    Ribeiro AJ; Ramos MJ; Fernandes PA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2010 Aug; 6(8):2281-92. PubMed ID: 26613486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prescription for the design and selection of density functional approximations: more constraint satisfaction with fewer fits.
    Perdew JP; Ruzsinszky A; Tao J; Staroverov VN; Scuseria GE; Csonka GI
    J Chem Phys; 2005 Aug; 123(6):62201. PubMed ID: 16122287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Performance of the Empirical Dispersion Corrections to Density Functional Theory: Thermodynamics of Hydrocarbon Isomerizations and Olefin Monomer Insertion Reactions.
    Shamov GA; Budzelaar PH; Schreckenbach G
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2010 Feb; 6(2):477-90. PubMed ID: 26617303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Trends in R-X bond dissociation energies (R = Me, Et, i-Pr, t-Bu; X = H, CH3, OCH3, OH, F): a surprising shortcoming of density functional theory.
    Izgorodina EI; Coote ML; Radom L
    J Phys Chem A; 2005 Aug; 109(33):7558-66. PubMed ID: 16834125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How well can new-generation density functional methods describe stacking interactions in biological systems?
    Zhao Y; Truhlar DG
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2005 Jul; 7(14):2701-5. PubMed ID: 16189582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Anharmonic vibrational frequency shifts upon interaction of phenol+ with the open shell ligand O2. The performance of DFT methods versus MP2.
    Kocevski V; Pejov L
    J Phys Chem A; 2012 Mar; 116(8):1939-49. PubMed ID: 22276555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of exchange-correlation functionals for time-dependent density functional theory calculations on metal complexes.
    Holland JP; Green JC
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Apr; 31(5):1008-14. PubMed ID: 19777596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Benchmark RI-MP2 database of nucleic acid base trimers: performance of different density functional models for prediction of structures and binding energies.
    Kabelác M; Valdes H; Sherer EC; Cramer CJ; Hobza P
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2007 Sep; 9(36):5000-8. PubMed ID: 17851596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Monoligand Zn(II) Complexes:  Ab Initio Benchmark Calculations and Comparison with Density Functional Theory Methodologies.
    Rayón VM; Valdés H; Díaz N; Suárez D
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2008 Feb; 4(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 26620656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Electronic structure, binding energy, and solvation structure of the streptavidin-biotin supramolecular complex: ONIOM and 3D-RISM study.
    Li Q; Gusarov S; Evoy S; Kovalenko A
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Jul; 113(29):9958-67. PubMed ID: 19545155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is the uniform electron gas limit important for small Ag clusters? Assessment of different density functionals for Ag(n) (n < or = 4).
    Zhao S; Li ZH; Wang WN; Liu ZP; Fan KN; Xie Y; Schaefer HF
    J Chem Phys; 2006 May; 124(18):184102. PubMed ID: 16709092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.