42 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26642244)
1. Multicenter randomized trial comparing diagnostic sensitivity and cellular abundance with aggressive versus standard biliary brushing for bile duct stenosis without mass syndrome.
Karsenti D; Privat J; Charissoux A; Perrot B; Leblanc S; Chaput U; Boytchev I; Levy J; Schaefer M; Bourgaux JF; Valats JC; Coron E; Moreno-Garcia M; Vanbiervliet G; Rahmi G; Robles EP; Wallenhorst T
Endoscopy; 2023 Sep; 55(9):796-803. PubMed ID: 36849106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic Performance of Bile Duct Brush Cytology with Risk of Malignancy of Standardized Categories in the Wake of World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Rath A; Pradeep I; Nigam JS
Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(6):639-649. PubMed ID: 37879315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical Perspective on Increasing Brush Cytology Yield.
Khamaysi I; Firman R; Martin P; Vasilyev G; Boyko E; Zussman E
ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2024 Mar; 10(3):1743-1752. PubMed ID: 38373217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The efficacy of bile liquid biopsy in the diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract cancer.
Miura Y; Ohyama H; Mikata R; Hirotsu Y; Amemiya K; Mochizuki H; Ikeda J; Ohtsuka M; Kato N; Omata M
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2024 May; 31(5):329-338. PubMed ID: 38523241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnosis of Malignant Biliary Strictures: Conventional or Negative Pressure Brush Cytology?
Abbasi MR; Ghazi Mirsaeed SM; Mohammad Alizadeh AH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016 Oct; 17(10):4563-4566. PubMed ID: 27892663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of brush cytology from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) on patient management at a UK teaching hospital.
Sethi R; Singh K; Warner B; Mahadeva U; Wilkinson M
Frontline Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 7(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 27103983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of diagnostic utility of new endoscopic scraper combined cell block method and conventional brush catheter for biliary tract cancer.
Kuniyoshi N; Yamada K; Osawa R; Nomura S; Fujisawa M; Saito K; Imazu H; Masuda S; Kogure H
DEN Open; 2024 Apr; 4(1):e331. PubMed ID: 38250519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Efficacy of a Novel Rotating Brush for Endoscopic Sampling of Malignant Biliary Strictures: A Multicenter Prospective Study.
Xia M; Shen Z; Zheng H; Yuan L; Hu J; Zhao Y; Zhou D; Bai X; Wang J; Li X; Dai W; Kang M; Zhou H; Wan R; Lu L; Hu B; Wan X; Cai X
Am J Gastroenterol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38477473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two intraductal brush cytology devices for suspected malignant biliary strictures: randomized controlled trial.
Gorris M; van Huijgevoort NCM; Fockens P; Meijer SL; Verheij J; Voermans RP; van Wanrooij RLJ; Lekkerkerker SJ; van Hooft JE
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4566-4573. PubMed ID: 36849566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Antegrade brushing cytology through the EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage route (with video).
Ogura T; Ueno S; Okuda A; Nishioka N; Higuchi K
Endosc Ultrasound; 2022; 11(2):141-142. PubMed ID: 34213432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal tissue sampling during ERCP and emerging molecular techniques for the differentiation of benign and malignant biliary strictures.
Kamp EJCA; Dinjens WNM; Doukas M; Bruno MJ; de Jonge PJF; Peppelenbosch MP; de Vries AC
Therap Adv Gastroenterol; 2021; 14():17562848211002023. PubMed ID: 33948111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Agreement between endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and endobiliary brush cytology in suspected pancreaticobiliary malignancies.
Sullivan MJ; Kincaid H; Shah S; Shah HN
Endosc Int Open; 2017 Dec; 5(12):E1251-E1258. PubMed ID: 29218317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diclofenac Does Not Reduce the Risk of Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis in Low-Risk Units.
Rainio M; Lindström O; Udd M; Louhimo J; Kylänpää L
J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 Aug; 21(8):1270-1277. PubMed ID: 28374181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective randomised study of dense Infinity cytological brush versus regularly used brush in pancreaticobiliary malignancy.
Kylänpää L; Boyd S; Ristimäki A; Lindström O; Udd M; Halttunen J
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016; 51(5):590-3. PubMed ID: 26642244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP.
Macken E; Drijkoningen M; Van Aken E; Van Steenbergen W
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2000; 63(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 11189981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benign, dysplastic, or malignant--making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients.
Lee JG; Leung JW; Baillie J; Layfield LJ; Cotton PB
Am J Gastroenterol; 1995 May; 90(5):722-6. PubMed ID: 7733076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and complication rate of brush cytology from bile duct versus pancreatic duct.
Vandervoort J; Soetikno RM; Montes H; Lichtenstein DR; Van Dam J; Ruymann FW; Cibas ES; Carr-Locke DL
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):322-7. PubMed ID: 10049415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided brushings in preoperative assessment of pancreaticobiliary strictures: what's new?
Athanassiadou P; Grapsa D
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 18323272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitivity of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography standard cytology: 10-y review of the literature.
Burnett AS; Calvert TJ; Chokshi RJ
J Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 184(1):304-11. PubMed ID: 23866788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
