These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26642244)
1. A prospective randomised study of dense Infinity cytological brush versus regularly used brush in pancreaticobiliary malignancy. Kylänpää L; Boyd S; Ristimäki A; Lindström O; Udd M; Halttunen J Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016; 51(5):590-3. PubMed ID: 26642244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Brush cytology of ductal strictures during ERCP. Macken E; Drijkoningen M; Van Aken E; Van Steenbergen W Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2000; 63(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 11189981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benign, dysplastic, or malignant--making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients. Lee JG; Leung JW; Baillie J; Layfield LJ; Cotton PB Am J Gastroenterol; 1995 May; 90(5):722-6. PubMed ID: 7733076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and complication rate of brush cytology from bile duct versus pancreatic duct. Vandervoort J; Soetikno RM; Montes H; Lichtenstein DR; Van Dam J; Ruymann FW; Cibas ES; Carr-Locke DL Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):322-7. PubMed ID: 10049415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic retrograde brush cytology. A new technique. Venu RP; Geenen JE; Kini M; Hogan WJ; Payne M; Johnson GK; Schmalz MJ Gastroenterology; 1990 Nov; 99(5):1475-9. PubMed ID: 2210255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical utility of stent cytology for the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary neoplasms. Devereaux BM; Fogel EL; Bucksot L; Shelly LA; Lehman GA; Sherman S Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 May; 98(5):1028-31. PubMed ID: 12809824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of a new long cytology brush in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study. Fogel EL; deBellis M; McHenry L; Watkins JL; Chappo J; Cramer H; Schmidt S; Lazzell-Pannell L; Sherman S; Lehman GA Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Jan; 63(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 16377319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive factors for positive diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures by transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy. Naitoh I; Nakazawa T; Kato A; Hayashi K; Miyabe K; Shimizu S; Kondo H; Nishi Y; Yoshida M; Umemura S; Hori Y; Kuno T; Takahashi S; Ohara H; Joh T J Dig Dis; 2016 Jan; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 26717051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic brush cytology from the biliary duct system is still valuable. Eiholm S; Thielsen P; Kromann-Andersen H Dan Med J; 2013 Jul; 60(7):A4656. PubMed ID: 23809967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of brush and basket cytology in differential diagnosis of bile duct stricture at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Bang KB; Kim HJ; Park JH; Park DI; Cho YK; Sohn CI; Jeon WK; Kim BI Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2014 Dec; 13(6):622-7. PubMed ID: 25475865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relative contribution of Ki-ras gene analysis and brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic diseases. Van Laethem JL; Bourgeois V; Parma J; Delhaye M; Cochaux P; Velu T; Devière J; Cremer M Gastrointest Endosc; 1998 Jun; 47(6):479-85. PubMed ID: 9647372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA methylation alterations in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography brush samples of patients with suspected pancreaticobiliary disease. Parsi MA; Li A; Li CP; Goggins M Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Nov; 6(11):1270-8. PubMed ID: 18995218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of Factors Affecting the Sensitivity of Bile Duct Brush Cytology. Kobayashi M; Ryozawa S; Araki R; Nagata K; Tanisaka Y; Fujita A; Kobatake T Intern Med; 2019 Feb; 58(3):329-335. PubMed ID: 30146607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biliary brush cytology for the diagnosis of malignancy: a single center experience. Stoos-Veić T; Bilić B; Kaić G; Ostović KT; Babić Z; Kujundzić M Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 20432742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The combination of stricture dilation, endoscopic needle aspiration, and biliary brushings significantly improves diagnostic yield from malignant bile duct strictures. Farrell RJ; Jain AK; Brandwein SL; Wang H; Chuttani R; Pleskow DK Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Nov; 54(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 11677474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening primary sclerosing cholangitis and biliary dysplasia with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and brush cytology: risk factors for biliary neoplasia. Boyd S; Tenca A; Jokelainen K; Mustonen H; Krogerus L; Arola J; Färkkilä MA Endoscopy; 2016 May; 48(5):432-9. PubMed ID: 26808393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monocentric study of bile aspiration associated with biliary brushing performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 239 patients with symptomatic biliary stricture. Fior-Gozlan M; Giovannini D; Rabeyrin M; Mc Leer-Florin A; Laverrière MH; Bichard P Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 May; 124(5):330-9. PubMed ID: 26700399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies. Ferrari Júnior AP; Lichtenstein DR; Slivka A; Chang C; Carr-Locke DL Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):140-5. PubMed ID: 8013810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancy by detection of minichromosome maintenance protein 5 in biliary brush cytology. Keane MG; Huggett MT; Chapman MH; Johnson GJ; Webster GJ; Thorburn D; Mackay J; Pereira SP Br J Cancer; 2017 Jan; 116(3):349-355. PubMed ID: 28081547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]