These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2664239)

  • 1. Biological defense research: charting a safer course.
    Jacobson JA; Rosenberg BH
    JAMA; 1989 Aug; 262(5):675-6. PubMed ID: 2664239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medicine in defense against biological warfare.
    Huxsoll DL; Parrott CD; Patrick WC
    JAMA; 1989 Aug; 262(5):677-9. PubMed ID: 2746818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biological weapons--banned, but gone forever?
    Humphrey JH
    Med War; 1987; 3(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 3470592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research on biological warfare is challenged.
    Cushman JH
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Sep; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11646226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biological defense defended.
    Norman C
    Science; 1988 May; 240(4855):981. PubMed ID: 11644306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chemical and biological warfare. Should defenses be researched and deployed?
    Orient JM
    JAMA; 1989 Aug; 262(5):644-8. PubMed ID: 2664235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biological warfare, genetic engineering, and the treaty that failed.
    Finder J
    Wash Q; 1986; 9(2):5-14. PubMed ID: 11650818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The dark side of biotechnology.
    Smith RJ
    Science; 1984 Jun; 224(4654):1215-6. PubMed ID: 6587564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No NIH ban.
    Budiansky S
    Nature; 1982 Jul; 298(5870):111. PubMed ID: 7088166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Will the USSR take genes to war?
    Joyce C
    New Sci; 1984 May; 102(1412):9. PubMed ID: 11655610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The medical profession and nuclear war. A social history.
    Day B; Waitzkin H
    JAMA; 1985 Aug; 254(5):644-51. PubMed ID: 3892071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic experiment by military approved.
    Cohn V; Hilts PJ
    Washington Post; 1984 Feb; ():A1, A7. PubMed ID: 11646347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Weapons of mass destruction: the greatest threat to public health.
    Sidel VW
    JAMA; 1989 Aug; 262(5):680-2. PubMed ID: 2746819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The final epidemic. Prescriptions for prevention.
    Hiatt HH
    JAMA; 1984 Aug; 252(5):635-8. PubMed ID: 6737667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. US looks to biological weapons.
    Nature; 1982 Jun; 297(5868):615-6. PubMed ID: 7088146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physician responsibility in the nuclear age.
    Lown B; Chazov EI
    JAMA; 1995 Aug; 274(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 7616639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Review of the U.S. Army's health risk assessments for oral exposure to six chemical-warfare agents. Introduction.
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2000 Mar; 59(5-6):281-526. PubMed ID: 10742829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Haber's choice, Hobson's choice, and biological warfare.
    Press N
    Perspect Biol Med; 1985; 29(1):92-108. PubMed ID: 3906558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NIH urged to act on germ war.
    Budiansky S
    Nature; 1982 Jun; 297(5867):527. PubMed ID: 7088135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chemical and bacteriological weapons in the 1980s.
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8395):141-3. PubMed ID: 6146039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.