1405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26643051)
1. Three-year longitudinal data on the clinical performance of the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test in a cervical cancer screening setting.
Poljak M; Oštrbenk A; Seme K; Šterbenc A; Jančar N; Vrtačnik Bokal E
J Clin Virol; 2016 Mar; 76 Suppl 1():S29-S39. PubMed ID: 26643051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.
Castle PE; Stoler MH; Wright TC; Sharma A; Wright TL; Behrens CM
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):880-90. PubMed ID: 21865084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methylation estimates the risk of precancer in HPV-infected women with discrepant results between cytology and HPV16/18 genotyping.
Hernández-López R; Lorincz AT; Torres-Ibarra L; Reuter C; Scibior-Bentkowska D; Warman R; Nedjai B; Mendiola-Pastrana I; León-Maldonado L; Rivera-Paredez B; Ramírez-Palacios P; Lazcano-Ponce E; Cuzick J; Salmerón J;
Clin Epigenetics; 2019 Oct; 11(1):140. PubMed ID: 31606044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human papillomavirus test with cytology triage in organized screening for cervical cancer.
Veijalainen O; Kares S; Kujala P; Tirkkonen M; Vuento R; Kholová I; Luukkaala T; Osuala V; Mäenpää J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Nov; 95(11):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 27591407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samples.
Song F; Du H; Wang C; Huang X; Wu R;
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234518. PubMed ID: 32525936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Defining Optimal Triage Strategies for hrHPV Screen-Positive Women-An Evaluation of HPV 16/18 Genotyping, Cytology, and p16/Ki-67 Cytoimmunochemistry.
Stanczuk GA; Baxter GJ; Currie H; Forson W; Lawrence JR; Cuschieri K; Wilson A; Patterson L; Govan L; Black J; Palmer T; Arbyn M
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2017 Nov; 26(11):1629-1635. PubMed ID: 28887297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of human papillomavirus genotyping and cytology triage, COMPACT Study: Design, methods and baseline results in 14 642 women.
Aoyama-Kikawa S; Fujita H; Hanley SJB; Kasamo M; Kikuchi K; Torigoe T; Matsuno Y; Tamakoshi A; Sasaki T; Matsuura M; Kato Y; Dong P; Watari H; Saito T; Sengoku K; Sakuragi N
Cancer Sci; 2018 Jun; 109(6):2003-2012. PubMed ID: 29660849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Head-to-Head Comparison of DH3 HPV Test and HC2 Assay for Detection of High-Risk HPV Infection in Residual Cytology Samples from Cervical Cancer Screening Setting: Baseline and 3-Year Longitudinal Data.
Fu Y; Li X; Li Y; Lu W; Xie X; Wang X
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Feb; 10(1):e0157021. PubMed ID: 35171029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The performance of human papillomavirus DNA detection with type 16/18 genotyping by hybrid capture in primary test of cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study in 10,669 Chinese women.
Zhao X; Wu Q; Wang X; Fu Y; Zhang X; Tian X; Cheng B; Lu B; Yu X; Lan S; Lu W; Ma D; Cheng X; Xie X
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2018 Dec; 24(12):1322-1327. PubMed ID: 29518562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical relevance of partial HPV16/18 genotyping in stratifying HPV-positive women attending routine cervical cancer screening: a population-based cohort study.
Gori S; Battagello J; Gustinucci D; Campari C; Zorzi M; Frayle H; Passamonti B; Sartori G; Bulletti S; Fodero C; Cesarini E; Faggiano R; Del Mistro A
BJOG; 2021 Jul; 128(8):1353-1362. PubMed ID: 33326680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA methylation marker for the triage of hrHPV positive women in cervical cancer screening: Real-world evidence in Taiwan.
Chang CL; Ho SC; Su YF; Juan YC; Huang CY; Chao AS; Hsu ZS; Chang CF; Fwu CW; Chang TC
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 May; 161(2):429-435. PubMed ID: 33757653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial.
Canfell K; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Heley S; Brotherton J; Gertig D; Jennett CJ; Farnsworth A; Tan J; Wrede CD; Castle PE; Saville M
PLoS Med; 2017 Sep; 14(9):e1002388. PubMed ID: 28926579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the management of Hr-HPV+/PapTest- women: results at 1-year recall.
Chiappetta C; Puggioni C; Lendaro E; Cacciotti J; Zaralli R; Migliore G; Bellardini P; Petrozza V; Della Rocca C; Di Cristofano C
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2015; 8(12):16089-96. PubMed ID: 26884886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Management of HPV-positive women in cervical screening using results from two consecutive screening rounds.
Polman NJ; Veldhuijzen NJ; Heideman DAM; Snijders PJF; Meijer CJLM; Berkhof J
Int J Cancer; 2019 May; 144(9):2339-2346. PubMed ID: 30565673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) using HPV DNA testing after a diagnosis of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US) in Catalonia, Spain.
Ibáñez R; Moreno-Crespi J; Sardà M; Autonell J; Fibla M; Gutiérrez C; Lloveras B; Alejo M; Català I; Alameda F; Casas M; Bosch FX; de Sanjosé S
BMC Infect Dis; 2012 Jan; 12():25. PubMed ID: 22280073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the effectiveness of HPV16/18 infection referred for colposcopy in cervical cancer screening in Northwest of China.
Zhang Q; Zhao M; Cao D; Wei X; Wang L; Li Y; Yang T; Zhao J; Pei M; Jia H; Cao S; Quan S; Yang X
J Med Virol; 2018 Jan; 90(1):165-171. PubMed ID: 28710863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk of high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia based on cytology and high-risk HPV testing at baseline and at 6-months.
Bulk S; Bulkmans NW; Berkhof J; Rozendaal L; Boeke AJ; Verheijen RH; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
Int J Cancer; 2007 Jul; 121(2):361-7. PubMed ID: 17354241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of partial genotyping with HPV16/18 for triage of HPV positive, cytology negative women in the COMPACT study.
Hanley SJB; Fujita H; Aoyama-Kikawa S; Kasamo M; Torigoe T; Matsuno Y; Noriaki S;
J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 32(6):e86. PubMed ID: 34708593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary cervical cancer screening with HPV testing compared with liquid-based cytology: results of round 1 of a randomised controlled trial -- the HPV FOCAL Study.
Ogilvie GS; Krajden M; van Niekerk DJ; Martin RE; Ehlen TG; Ceballos K; Smith LW; Kan L; Cook DA; Peacock S; Stuart GC; Franco EL; Coldman AJ
Br J Cancer; 2012 Dec; 107(12):1917-24. PubMed ID: 23169286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
