These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26643119)

  • 1. No single electrophysiological marker for facilitation and inhibition of return: A review.
    Martín-Arévalo E; Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 300():1-10. PubMed ID: 26643119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological modulations of exogenous attention by intervening events.
    Martín-Arévalo E; Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Mar; 85():239-50. PubMed ID: 24463767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
    Zhou X; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vertical asymmetries and inhibition of return: effects of spatial and non-spatial cueing on behavior and visual ERPs.
    Gutiérrez-Domínguez FJ; Pazo-Álvarez P; Doallo S; Fuentes LJ; Lorenzo-López L; Amenedo E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Feb; 91(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 24342058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural networks underlying endogenous and exogenous visual-spatial orienting.
    Mayer AR; Dorflinger JM; Rao SM; Seidenberg M
    Neuroimage; 2004 Oct; 23(2):534-41. PubMed ID: 15488402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal ambiguity of onsets in a cueing task prevents facilitation but not inhibition of return.
    Malevich T; Ardasheva L; Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 29075992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of different directions of attentional shift on inhibition of return in three-dimensional space.
    Wang A; Liu X; Chen Q; Zhang M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):838-47. PubMed ID: 26758976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for an attentional component of inhibition of return in visual search.
    Pierce AM; Crouse MD; Green JJ
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Nov; 54(11):1676-1685. PubMed ID: 28580702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inhibition of return: a "depth-blind" mechanism?
    Casagrande M; Barbato M; Mereu S; Martella D; Marotta A; Theeuwes J; Collinson SL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 22465912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of ignored versus foveated cues upon inhibition of return: an event-related potential study.
    Satel J; Hilchey MD; Wang Z; Story R; Klein RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jan; 75(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 23077028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological explorations of the cause and effect of inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm.
    Tian Y; Klein RM; Satel J; Xu P; Yao D
    Brain Topogr; 2011 Jun; 24(2):164-82. PubMed ID: 21365310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facilitation and inhibition caused by the orienting of attention in propositional reasoning tasks.
    Cherubini P; Mazzocco A; Minelli S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Nov; 60(11):1496-523. PubMed ID: 17853220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining the dissociation of retinotopic and spatiotopic inhibition of return with event-related potentials.
    Satel J; Wang Z; Hilchey MD; Klein RM
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Aug; 524(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 22801253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Task dependent modulation of exogenous attention: effects of target duration and intervening events.
    Martín-Arévalo E; Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1148-60. PubMed ID: 23709067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An event-related fMRI study of exogenous orienting: supporting evidence for the cortical basis of inhibition of return?
    Mayer AR; Seidenberg M; Dorflinger JM; Rao SM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 16(7):1262-71. PubMed ID: 15453978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inhibition of return revisited: Localized inhibition on top of a pervasive bias.
    Wang B; Yan C; Klein RM; Wang Z
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1861-1867. PubMed ID: 29247423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Object-centered orienting and IOR.
    Theeuwes J; Mathôt S; Grainger J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2249-55. PubMed ID: 24935810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is "Inhibition of Return" due to the inhibition of the return of attention?
    Martín-Arévalo E; Kingstone A; Lupiáñez J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(2):347-59. PubMed ID: 22928599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inhibition of return exaggerates change blindness.
    Smith DT; Schenk T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 20336583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on visual processing: an Inhibition of Return study.
    Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
    Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 1278():75-85. PubMed ID: 19374885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.