These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. A new method of subjective refraction. Humphrey WE Buch Augenarzt; 1982; 90():13-21. PubMed ID: 7093775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid? Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic photorefraction system: an offline application for the dynamic analysis of ocular focus and pupil size from photorefraction images. Suryakumar R; Kwok D; Fernandez S; Bobier WR Comput Biol Med; 2009 Mar; 39(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 19217087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Influence of hypobaric environmental and working conditions on the ocular dioptric apparatus]. Popescu MP; Stefan M; Cincă N; Pintilie I; Stoian M Fiziol Norm Patol; 1965; 11(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 5865217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Examination procedure in automated determination of far and near vision]. Effert R; Jansen W; Rau G; Reim M Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 Mar; 204(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 8196305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Should not we correct some of Donder's assumptions?]. Rozenblium IuZ Vestn Oftalmol; 1999; 115(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 10207323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Automatic measurement of the refractive properties of the eye. Safir A Med Res Eng; 1972; 11(2):12-20. PubMed ID: 4665901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A new subjective refraction method--the meridional polarized vernier optometer. Salmon TO; Horner DG J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):599-605. PubMed ID: 8942132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy and accommodation capability of a handheld autorefractor. Wesemann W; Dick B J Cataract Refract Surg; 2000 Jan; 26(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 10646148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of aberrometry-based relative peripheral refraction measurements. Berntsen DA; Mutti DO; Zadnik K Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 18201339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements. Nissman SA; Tractenberg RE; Saba CM; Douglas JC; Lustbader JM Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Eye and eyeglasses]. Reiner J Buch Augenarzt; 1972; 59():1-132. PubMed ID: 5063498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of results of retinoscopy, Javal-Schiotz ophthalmometry and Hartinger refractometer in the determination of ocular refraction]. Mirkiewicz-Sieradzka B; Hydzik M Klin Oczna; 1973 Oct; 43(10):1129-34. PubMed ID: 4762965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Traditional versus computer-assisted refraction: "which is better?". Borish IM; Catania LJ J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Dec; 68(12):749-56. PubMed ID: 9635380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction. Rosenfield M; Chiu NN Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):577-9. PubMed ID: 8539026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Computation of refraction from skiascope values]. Schulte D Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1971 Aug; 159(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 5096155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]