259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26643690)
1. It's the power of food: individual differences in food cue responsiveness and snacking in everyday life.
Schüz B; Schüz N; Ferguson SG
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Dec; 12():149. PubMed ID: 26643690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Personal and situational predictors of everyday snacking: An application of temporal self-regulation theory.
Elliston KG; Ferguson SG; Schüz B
Br J Health Psychol; 2017 Nov; 22(4):854-871. PubMed ID: 28722217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Higher BMI is associated with stronger effects of social cues on everyday snacking behaviour.
Schüz B; Revell S; Hills AP; Schüz N; Ferguson SG
Appetite; 2017 Jul; 114():1-5. PubMed ID: 28315417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Situational cues and momentary food environment predict everyday eating behavior in adults with overweight and obesity.
Elliston KG; Ferguson SG; Schüz N; Schüz B
Health Psychol; 2017 Apr; 36(4):337-345. PubMed ID: 27669177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Situation-specific social norms as mediators of social influence on snacking.
Schüz B; Papadakis T; Ferguson SG
Health Psychol; 2018 Feb; 37(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 29154607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Within-Day Variability in Negative Affect Moderates Cue Responsiveness in High-Calorie Snacking.
Papadakis T; Ferguson SG; Schüz B
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():590497. PubMed ID: 33488458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Derailing the streetcar named desire. Cognitive distractions reduce individual differences in cravings and unhealthy snacking in response to palatable food.
van Dillen LF; Andrade J
Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():102-110. PubMed ID: 26375358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity to reward and adolescents' unhealthy snacking and drinking behavior: the role of hedonic eating styles and availability.
De Cock N; Van Lippevelde W; Goossens L; De Clercq B; Vangeel J; Lachat C; Beullens K; Huybregts L; Vervoort L; Eggermont S; Maes L; Braet C; Deforche B; Kolsteren P; Van Camp J
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2016 Feb; 13():17. PubMed ID: 26861539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Food cravings in everyday life: An EMA study on snack-related thoughts, cravings, and consumption.
Richard A; Meule A; Reichenberger J; Blechert J
Appetite; 2017 Jun; 113():215-223. PubMed ID: 28249745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tracking snacking in real time: Time to look at individualised patterns of behaviour.
Allan J; McMinn D; Powell D
Nutr Health; 2019 Sep; 25(3):179-184. PubMed ID: 31347450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comfort eating: An observational study of affect in the hours immediately before, and after, snacking.
Franja S; Wahl DR; Elliston KG; Ferguson SG
Br J Health Psychol; 2021 Sep; 26(3):825-838. PubMed ID: 33398921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feeding styles, parenting styles and snacking behaviour in children attending primary schools in multiethnic neighbourhoods: a cross-sectional study.
Wang L; van de Gaar VM; Jansen W; Mieloo CL; van Grieken A; Raat H
BMJ Open; 2017 Jul; 7(7):e015495. PubMed ID: 28710213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. It's my party and I eat if I want to. Reasons for unhealthy snacking.
Verhoeven AA; Adriaanse MA; de Vet E; Fennis BM; de Ridder DT
Appetite; 2015 Jan; 84():20-7. PubMed ID: 25261101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The moderating role of state inhibitory control in the effect of evaluative conditioning on temptation and unhealthy snacking.
Haynes A; Kemps E; Moffitt R
Physiol Behav; 2015 Dec; 152(Pt A):135-42. PubMed ID: 26409213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stimulus control and affect in dietary behaviours. An intensive longitudinal study.
Schüz B; Bower J; Ferguson SG
Appetite; 2015 Apr; 87():310-7. PubMed ID: 25579222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of food labels by adolescents to make healthier choices on snacks: a cross-sectional study from Sri Lanka.
Talagala IA; Arambepola C
BMC Public Health; 2016 Aug; 16():739. PubMed ID: 27502411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sweetened drink and snacking cues in adolescents: a study using ecological momentary assessment.
Grenard JL; Stacy AW; Shiffman S; Baraldi AN; MacKinnon DP; Lockhart G; Kisbu-Sakarya Y; Boyle S; Beleva Y; Koprowski C; Ames SL; Reynolds KD
Appetite; 2013 Aug; 67():61-73. PubMed ID: 23583312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of external food cue responsiveness in preschool-age children: Preliminary evidence for the use of the external food cue responsiveness scale.
Masterson TD; Gilbert-Diamond D; Lansigan RK; Kim SJ; Schiffelbein JE; Emond JA
Appetite; 2019 Aug; 139():119-126. PubMed ID: 31047939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are commonly used lab-based measures of food value and choice predictive of self-reported real-world snacking? An ecological momentary assessment study.
Masterton S; Hardman CA; Boyland E; Robinson E; Makin HE; Jones A
Br J Health Psychol; 2023 Feb; 28(1):237-251. PubMed ID: 36000399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identifying the 'if' for 'if-then' plans: combining implementation intentions with cue-monitoring targeting unhealthy snacking behaviour.
Verhoeven AA; Adriaanse MA; de Vet E; Fennis BM; de Ridder DT
Psychol Health; 2014; 29(12):1476-92. PubMed ID: 25099386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
