174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26644356)
1. Whole-mount pathology of breast lumpectomy specimens improves detection of tumour margins and focality.
Clarke GM; Holloway CM; Zubovits JT; Nofech-Mozes S; Liu K; Murray M; Wang D; Yaffe MJ
Histopathology; 2016 Jul; 69(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 26644356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of margin status and lesional size between radioactive seed localized vs conventional wire localized breast lumpectomy specimens.
Rarick J; Kimler BF; Tawfik O
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2016 Apr; 21():47-52. PubMed ID: 27040931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional tumor visualization of invasive breast carcinomas using whole-mount serial section histopathology: implications for tumor size assessment.
Clarke GM; Holloway CMB; Zubovits JT; Nofech-Mozes S; Murray M; Liu K; Wang D; Kiss A; Yaffe MJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Apr; 174(3):669-677. PubMed ID: 30612274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Standardized pathologic examination of breast excision specimen. Relevance within an interdisciplinary practice protocol for quality management of breast saving therapy].
Decker T; Ruhnke M; Schneider W
Pathologe; 1997 Jan; 18(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 9157405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An Assessment of Margins after Lumpectomy in Breast Cancer Management.
Rivere AE; Chiasson KF; Corsetti RL; Fuhrman GM
Am Surg; 2016 Feb; 82(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 26874139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Resection margin status in lumpectomy specimens for duct carcinoma of the breast: correlation with core biopsy and mammographic findings.
Mai KT; Chaudhuri M; Perkins DG; Mirsky D
J Surg Oncol; 2001 Nov; 78(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 11745804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive value of extent and grade of ductal carcinoma in situ in radiologically guided core biopsy for the status of margins in lumpectomy specimens.
Mai KT; Yazdi HM; Ford JC; Matzinger FR
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Nov; 26(7):646-51. PubMed ID: 11078610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of lumpectomy surgical specimen radiographs in subclinical, in situ and invasive breast cancer, and factors predicting positive margins.
Rua C; Lebas P; Michenet P; Ouldamer L
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2012 Nov; 93(11):871-7. PubMed ID: 23021868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can micro-computed tomography imaging improve interpretation of macroscopic margin assessment of specimen radiography in excised breast specimens?
Abel TN; Bourke AG
J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(6):1366-1370. PubMed ID: 33342798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Ali I; Feldman SM; Cohen JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2940-5. PubMed ID: 17632761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Additional Cavity Shaving at the Time of Breast-Conserving Surgery Enhances Accuracy of Margin Status Examination.
Pata G; Bartoli M; Bianchi A; Pasini M; Roncali S; Ragni F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):2802-8. PubMed ID: 27034079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying Factors and Techniques to Decrease the Positive Margin Rate in Partial Mastectomies: Have We Missed the Mark?
Edwards SB; Leitman IM; Wengrofsky AJ; Giddins MJ; Harris E; Mills CB; Fukuhara S; Cassaro S
Breast J; 2016 May; 22(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 26854189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
Merrill AL; Coopey SB; Tang R; McEvoy MP; Specht MC; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 26467458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscopy 'Histolog® scanner' for breast margin assessment in comparison with conventional specimen radiography.
Togawa R; Hederer J; Ragazzi M; Bruckner T; Fastner S; Gomez C; Hennigs A; Nees J; Pfob A; Riedel F; Schäfgen B; Stieber A; Lux MP; Heil J; Golatta M
Breast; 2023 Apr; 68():194-200. PubMed ID: 36842192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of margin assessment by radial and shave sections in wide local excision specimens for invasive carcinoma of the breast.
Hodi Z; Ellis IO; Elston CW; Pinder SE; Donovan G; Macmillan RD; Lee AH
Histopathology; 2010 Apr; 56(5):573-80. PubMed ID: 20459567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A nationwide pathology study on surgical margins and excision volumes after breast-conserving surgery: There is still much to be gained.
Haloua MH; Volders JH; Krekel NM; Barbé E; Sietses C; Jóźwiak K; Meijer S; van den Tol MP
Breast; 2016 Feb; 25():14-21. PubMed ID: 26801411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients.
Bakhshandeh M; Tutuncuoglu SO; Fischer G; Masood S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):656-9. PubMed ID: 17854083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is frozen section analysis of reexcision lumpectomy margins worthwhile? Margin analysis in breast reexcisions.
Sauter ER; Hoffman JP; Ottery FD; Kowalyshyn MJ; Litwin S; Eisenberg BL
Cancer; 1994 May; 73(10):2607-12. PubMed ID: 8174059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of resection margins and cosmetic outcome following intraoperative ultrasound-guided excision versus conventional palpation-guided breast conservation surgery in breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial.
Vispute T; ; Seenu V; Parshad R; Hari S; Thulkar S; Mathur S
Indian J Cancer; 2018; 55(4):361-365. PubMed ID: 30829271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
