These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26644630)

  • 1. Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast.
    Schertz J; Cho T; Lotto A; Warner N
    J Phon; 2015 Sep; 52():183-204. PubMed ID: 26644630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in perceptual adaptability of foreign sound categories.
    Schertz J; Cho T; Lotto A; Warner N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):355-67. PubMed ID: 26404530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Language Specificity in Phonetic Cue Weighting: Monolingual and Bilingual Perception of the Stop Voicing Contrast in English and Spanish.
    Schertz J; Carbonell K; Lotto AJ
    Phonetica; 2020; 77(3):186-208. PubMed ID: 31018217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brainstem and early cortical auditory activities associated with language differences in acoustic cue weighting for voicing perception.
    Tamura S; Sung Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2020 Sep; 735():135154. PubMed ID: 32544598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual Differences in Categorical Judgment of L2 Stops: A Link to Proficiency and Acoustic Cue-Weighting.
    Kong EJ; Kang S
    Lang Speech; 2023 Jun; 66(2):354-380. PubMed ID: 35822267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phonetic Encoding of Coda Voicing Contrast under Different Focus Conditions in L1 vs. L2 English.
    Choi J; Kim S; Cho T
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():624. PubMed ID: 27242571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Production of coda voicing contrast of L2 English by native Mandarin Chinese speakers in comparison with native Korean speakers.
    Du Z; Kim S; Cho T
    JASA Express Lett; 2022 Aug; 2(8):. PubMed ID: 37311194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual Cue Weighting Is Influenced by the Listener's Gender and Subjective Evaluations of the Speaker: The Case of English Stop Voicing.
    Yu ACL
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():840291. PubMed ID: 35529558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual differences in processing non-speech acoustic signals influence cue weighting strategies for L2 speech contrasts.
    Liu X
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2022 Aug; 51(4):903-916. PubMed ID: 35320458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional Modulation and Individual Differences in Explaining the Changing Role of Fundamental Frequency in Korean Laryngeal Stop Perception.
    Kong EJ; Lee H
    Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):384-408. PubMed ID: 28937301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cue-specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English.
    Francis AL; Kaganovich N; Driscoll-Huber C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1234-51. PubMed ID: 18681610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Sound Change on the Weighting of Acoustic Cues to the Three-Way Laryngeal Stop Contrast in Korean: Diachronic and Dialectal Comparisons.
    Lee H; Jongman A
    Lang Speech; 2019 Sep; 62(3):509-530. PubMed ID: 30014745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clear speech production of Korean stops: changing phonetic targets and enhancement strategies.
    Kang KH; Guion SG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3909-17. PubMed ID: 19206816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory enhancement and second language experience in Spanish and English weighting of secondary voicing cues.
    Llanos F; Dmitrieva O; Shultz A; Francis AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2213-24. PubMed ID: 23967951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speakers of tonal and non-tonal Korean dialects use different cue weightings in the perception of the three-way laryngeal stop contrast.
    Lee H; Politzer-Ahles S; Jongman A
    J Phon; 2013 Mar; 41(2):117-132. PubMed ID: 25301975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual Talker and Token Covariation in the Production of Multiple Cues to Stop Voicing.
    Clayards M
    Phonetica; 2018; 75(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 28595176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhancement of laryngeal contrasts in non-native English clear speech: a comparison between L2-immersed sequential bilinguals and L1-immersed speakers.
    Jung YJ; Dmitrieva O
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2024; 18():1413886. PubMed ID: 39345944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of final fricative voicing: native and nonnative listeners' use of vowel duration.
    Broersma M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1636-44. PubMed ID: 20329862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voice and Emphasis in Arabic Coronal Stops: Evidence for Phonological Compensation.
    Kulikov V
    Lang Speech; 2022 Mar; 65(1):73-104. PubMed ID: 33455538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic Properties Predict Perception of Unfamiliar Dutch Vowels by Adult Australian English and Peruvian Spanish Listeners.
    Alispahic S; Mulak KE; Escudero P
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():52. PubMed ID: 28191001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.