200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26644630)
1. Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast.
Schertz J; Cho T; Lotto A; Warner N
J Phon; 2015 Sep; 52():183-204. PubMed ID: 26644630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Individual differences in perceptual adaptability of foreign sound categories.
Schertz J; Cho T; Lotto A; Warner N
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):355-67. PubMed ID: 26404530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Language Specificity in Phonetic Cue Weighting: Monolingual and Bilingual Perception of the Stop Voicing Contrast in English and Spanish.
Schertz J; Carbonell K; Lotto AJ
Phonetica; 2020; 77(3):186-208. PubMed ID: 31018217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Brainstem and early cortical auditory activities associated with language differences in acoustic cue weighting for voicing perception.
Tamura S; Sung Y
Neurosci Lett; 2020 Sep; 735():135154. PubMed ID: 32544598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Individual Differences in Categorical Judgment of L2 Stops: A Link to Proficiency and Acoustic Cue-Weighting.
Kong EJ; Kang S
Lang Speech; 2023 Jun; 66(2):354-380. PubMed ID: 35822267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phonetic Encoding of Coda Voicing Contrast under Different Focus Conditions in L1 vs. L2 English.
Choi J; Kim S; Cho T
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():624. PubMed ID: 27242571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Production of coda voicing contrast of L2 English by native Mandarin Chinese speakers in comparison with native Korean speakers.
Du Z; Kim S; Cho T
JASA Express Lett; 2022 Aug; 2(8):. PubMed ID: 37311194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptual Cue Weighting Is Influenced by the Listener's Gender and Subjective Evaluations of the Speaker: The Case of English Stop Voicing.
Yu ACL
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():840291. PubMed ID: 35529558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Individual differences in processing non-speech acoustic signals influence cue weighting strategies for L2 speech contrasts.
Liu X
J Psycholinguist Res; 2022 Aug; 51(4):903-916. PubMed ID: 35320458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attentional Modulation and Individual Differences in Explaining the Changing Role of Fundamental Frequency in Korean Laryngeal Stop Perception.
Kong EJ; Lee H
Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):384-408. PubMed ID: 28937301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cue-specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English.
Francis AL; Kaganovich N; Driscoll-Huber C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1234-51. PubMed ID: 18681610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of Sound Change on the Weighting of Acoustic Cues to the Three-Way Laryngeal Stop Contrast in Korean: Diachronic and Dialectal Comparisons.
Lee H; Jongman A
Lang Speech; 2019 Sep; 62(3):509-530. PubMed ID: 30014745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clear speech production of Korean stops: changing phonetic targets and enhancement strategies.
Kang KH; Guion SG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3909-17. PubMed ID: 19206816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory enhancement and second language experience in Spanish and English weighting of secondary voicing cues.
Llanos F; Dmitrieva O; Shultz A; Francis AL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2213-24. PubMed ID: 23967951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speakers of tonal and non-tonal Korean dialects use different cue weightings in the perception of the three-way laryngeal stop contrast.
Lee H; Politzer-Ahles S; Jongman A
J Phon; 2013 Mar; 41(2):117-132. PubMed ID: 25301975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Individual Talker and Token Covariation in the Production of Multiple Cues to Stop Voicing.
Clayards M
Phonetica; 2018; 75(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 28595176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perception of final fricative voicing: native and nonnative listeners' use of vowel duration.
Broersma M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1636-44. PubMed ID: 20329862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Voice and Emphasis in Arabic Coronal Stops: Evidence for Phonological Compensation.
Kulikov V
Lang Speech; 2022 Mar; 65(1):73-104. PubMed ID: 33455538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acoustic Properties Predict Perception of Unfamiliar Dutch Vowels by Adult Australian English and Peruvian Spanish Listeners.
Alispahic S; Mulak KE; Escudero P
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():52. PubMed ID: 28191001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of L1 prosody on segmental contrast in L2: The case of English stop voicing contrast produced by Korean speakers.
Choi J; Kim S; Cho T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):EL76-82. PubMed ID: 27036291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
