These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26645480)

  • 1. Assessing the Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography in Measuring Thinning Oral and Buccal Bone.
    Raskó Z; Nagy L; Radnai M; Piffkó J; Baráth Z
    J Oral Implantol; 2016 Jun; 42(3):311-4. PubMed ID: 26645480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of circumferential bone level assessment around single implants in healed ridges and extraction sockets using cone beam CT.
    Raes F; Renckens L; Aps J; Cosyn J; De Bruyn H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Oct; 15(5):661-72. PubMed ID: 22008055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of detecting and measuring buccal bone thickness adjacent to titanium dental implants-a cone beam computed tomography in vitro study.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; da Silveira HED; Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Nov; 126(5):432-438. PubMed ID: 30126809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting the possibility to detect buccal bone condition around dental implants using cone beam computed tomography.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; da Silveira HED; Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1082-1088. PubMed ID: 27444713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of peri-implant bone evaluation using cone beam CT, digital intra-oral radiographs and histology.
    Ritter L; Elger MC; Rothamel D; Fienitz T; Zinser M; Schwarz F; Zöller JE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20130088. PubMed ID: 24786136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effect of Implant-Induced Artifacts on Interpreting Adjacent Bone Structures on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans.
    Sheridan RA; Chiang YC; Decker AM; Sutthiboonyapan P; Chan HL; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2018 Feb; 27(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 29095787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography.
    Razavi T; Palmer RM; Davies J; Wilson R; Palmer PJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):718-25. PubMed ID: 20636726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of buccal bone volume of dental implants by means of cone-beam computed tomography.
    Shiratori LN; Marotti J; Yamanouchi J; Chilvarquer I; Contin I; Tortamano-Neto P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):797-804. PubMed ID: 21631591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
    Timock AM; Cook V; McDonald T; Leo MC; Crowe J; Benninger BL; Covell DA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cone beam computed tomography artefacts around dental implants with different materials influencing the detection of peri-implant bone defects.
    Schriber M; Yeung AWK; Suter VGA; Buser D; Leung YY; Bornstein MM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jul; 31(7):595-606. PubMed ID: 32147872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone-beam CT due to implant blooming: An ex-vivo study.
    Vanderstuyft T; Tarce M; Sanaan B; Jacobs R; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Quirynen M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2019 Nov; 46(11):1134-1143. PubMed ID: 31446644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
    González-García R; Monje F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Qualitative Assessment of Reliability of Cone-beam Computed Tomography in evaluating Bone Density at Posterior Mandibular Implant Site.
    Dahiya K; Kumar N; Bajaj P; Sharma A; Sikka R; Dahiya S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Apr; 19(4):426-430. PubMed ID: 29728548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A dental implant-based registration method for measuring mandibular kinematics using cone beam computed tomography-based fluoroscopy.
    Lin CC; Chen CC; Chen YJ; Lu TW; Hong SW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):798-806. PubMed ID: 25032759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Labial bone assessment surrounding dental implant using cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
    Naitoh M; Hayashi H; Tsukamoto N; Ariji E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Aug; 23(8):970-4. PubMed ID: 22092916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study of available bone for interforaminal implant treatment using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Madrigal C; Ortega R; Meniz C; López-Quiles J
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2008 May; 13(5):E307-12. PubMed ID: 18449115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone defect regeneration: a histologically controlled study in dogs.
    Fienitz T; Schwarz F; Ritter L; Dreiseidler T; Becker J; Rothamel D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):882-7. PubMed ID: 21707753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT versus intraoral imaging for assessment of peri-implant bone defects.
    Song D; Shujaat S; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Huang Y; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Feb; 21(1):23. PubMed ID: 33568085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study.
    Kuusisto N; Abushahba F; Syrjänen S; Huumonen S; Vallittu P; Närhi T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Nov; 52(8):20230252. PubMed ID: 37641961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro comparison of the effect of different slice thicknesses on the accuracy of linear measurements on cone beam computed tomography images in implant sites.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 25569395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.