BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26645754)

  • 21. Performance and characteristics of the Newborn Hearing Screening Programme in England: The first seven years.
    Wood SA; Sutton GJ; Davis AC
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 25766652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cochlear implantation in pediatrics: Impact of newborn hearing screening on intervention time.
    Alothman N; Abdelsamad Y; Almuhawas F; Allami H; Hagr A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jun; 181():111990. PubMed ID: 38796944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of hearing loss after failed neonatal hearing screening.
    Holster IL; Hoeve LJ; Wieringa MH; Willis-Lorrier RM; de Gier HH
    J Pediatr; 2009 Nov; 155(5):646-50. PubMed ID: 19616786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? Analyses of hearing and speech perception performance after implantation.
    Harrison RV; Gordon KA; Mount RJ
    Dev Psychobiol; 2005 Apr; 46(3):252-61. PubMed ID: 15772969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Newborn hearing screening and cochlear implantation: impact on spoken language development.
    Boons T; Brokx J; Frijns J; Philips B; Vermeulen A; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    B-ENT; 2013; Suppl 21():91-8. PubMed ID: 24383227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Limitations of universal newborn hearing screening in early identification of pediatric cochlear implant candidates.
    Young NM; Reilly BK; Burke L
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Mar; 137(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 21422305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Complications of cochlear implant surgery: A ten-year experience in a referral hospital in Peru, 2006-2015.
    Alcas O; Salazar MA
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Sep; 17(5):238-242. PubMed ID: 27535059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Responsive parenting intervention after identification of hearing loss by Universal Newborn Hearing Screening: the concept of the Muenster Parental Programme.
    Reichmuth K; Embacher AJ; Matulat P; Am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen A; Glanemann R
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Dec; 77(12):2030-9. PubMed ID: 24182601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Our experience with bilateral cochlear implantation].
    Carmel E; Taitelbaum-Swead R; Migirov L; Hildesheimer M; Kronenberg J
    Harefuah; 2008 Mar; 147(3):200-3, 279. PubMed ID: 18488858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reading abilities after cochlear implantation: the effect of age at implantation on outcomes at 5 and 7 years after implantation.
    Archbold S; Harris M; O'Donoghue G; Nikolopoulos T; White A; Richmond HL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1471-8. PubMed ID: 18703236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Access to cochlear implants: Time to reflect.
    Raine C; Atkinson H; Strachan DR; Martin JM
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Apr; 17 Suppl 1():42-6. PubMed ID: 27099110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cochlear implantation in children.
    Kim LS; Jeong SW; Lee YM; Kim JS
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Feb; 37(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 19897328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Congenitally deaf children's care trajectories in the context of universal neonatal hearing screening: a qualitative study of the parental experiences.
    Hardonk S; Desnerck G; Loots G; Van Hove G; Van Kerschaver E; Sigurjónsdóttir HB; Vanroelen C; Louckx F
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2011; 16(3):305-24. PubMed ID: 21367846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Evaluation of the Austrian Newborn Hearing Screening Program].
    Weichbold V; Nekahm-Heis D; Welzl-Müller K
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2005 Sep; 117(18):641-6. PubMed ID: 16416347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptions of pediatric primary care physicians on congenital hearing loss and cochlear implantation.
    Carron JD; Moore RB; Dhaliwal AS
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 2006 Feb; 47(2):35-41. PubMed ID: 17941220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Advantages of cochlear implantation in prelingual deaf children before 2 years of age when compared with later implantation.
    Manrique M; Cervera-Paz FJ; Huarte A; Molina M
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1462-9. PubMed ID: 15280727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Recent epidemiology of pediatric cochlear implantation in the United States: disparity among children of different ethnicity and socioeconomic status.
    Stern RE; Yueh B; Lewis C; Norton S; Sie KC
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jan; 115(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 15630380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Background and educational characteristics of prelingually deaf children implanted by five years of age.
    Geers A; Brenner C
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1 Suppl):2S-14S. PubMed ID: 12612476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Currently possibilities for diagnostics and electroacoustical correction of hearing in the children].
    Savel'eva EE; Kargina IuS
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2012; (6):16-8. PubMed ID: 23268239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Access to cochlear implant candidacy evaluations: who is not making it to the team evaluations?
    Wiley S; Meinzen-Derr J
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Feb; 48(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19219691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.