These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26645850)
1. Considered Becoming a Manuscript Reviewer? Harris M Home Healthc Now; 2016 Jan; 34(1):52. PubMed ID: 26645850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The manuscripts' review process in Revista Médica de Chile and its peer-reviewers during the year 2012]. Reyes B H; Andresen H M; Palma H J Rev Med Chil; 2013 Jul; 141(7):903-8. PubMed ID: 24356739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Submitting a manuscript to the ASRT. Frosch JR Radiol Technol; 2012; 83(3):291-2. PubMed ID: 22267696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A cautionary tale: on becoming an "unmasked" reviewer. Levine RE Acad Psychiatry; 2006; 30(3):263-4. PubMed ID: 16728776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer. Faggion CM Br Dent J; 2016 Feb; 220(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 26917302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How to get published and how to review. Maas M Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1029. PubMed ID: 24840479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals. Azer SA; Ramani S; Peterson R Med Teach; 2012; 34(9):698-704. PubMed ID: 22643022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Section Editor's Notebook: Mentoring, Academic Careers, and Manuscript Reviewing. Forman HP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):1. PubMed ID: 27845839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Review criteria for research manuscripts. Bordage G; Caelleigh AS; Steinecke A; Bland CJ; Crandall SJ; McGaghie WC; Pangaro LN; Penn G; Regehr G; Shea JS; Acad Med; 2001 Sep; 76(9):897-978. PubMed ID: 11565558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Web manuscript submission and tracking system for peer review. The journal moves with the time. Schroeder TV; Beard JD Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2002 Feb; 23(2):95-6. PubMed ID: 11863324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer review at the American Journal of Roentgenology: how reviewer and manuscript characteristics affected editorial decisions on 196 major papers. Kliewer MA; DeLong DM; Freed K; Jenkins CB; Paulson EK; Provenzale JM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1545-50. PubMed ID: 15547189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Problems identified by secondary review of accepted manuscripts. Garfunkel JM; Ulshen MH; Hamrick HJ; Lawson EE JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1369-71. PubMed ID: 2304215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Alphabetic bias in the selection of reviewers for the American Journal of Roentgenology. Richardson ML AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Dec; 191(6):W213-6. PubMed ID: 19020207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How to review a manuscript: a "down-to-earth" approach. Roberts LW; Coverdale J; Edenharder K; Louie A Acad Psychiatry; 2004; 28(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 15298858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How to review a scientific paper. Tandon R Asian J Psychiatr; 2014 Oct; 11():124-7. PubMed ID: 25248566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On publication of a manuscript: the author, the reviewer and the editor. Tonkin M Hand Surg; 2013; 18(3):ix-x. PubMed ID: 24156598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How to Review a Manuscript. Hill JA J Electrocardiol; 2016; 49(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 26850498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trainees in peer review: our experience. Castillo M AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):211-3. PubMed ID: 23703147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]