396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26646637)
1. Miniplate osteosynthesis for mandibular angle fractures--A retrospective comparative study of 3 concepts in a temporal cohort.
Strasz M; Wolschner R; Schopper C; Pöschl WP; Perisanidis C; Wick F; Seemann R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 44(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 26646637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative biomechanical study on three miniplates osteosynthesis systems for stabilisation of low condylar fractures of the mandible.
Hakim SG; Wolf M; Wendlandt R; Kimmerle H; Sieg P; Jacobsen HC
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 52(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 24629455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mandibular angle fractures: two-miniplate fixation and complications.
Fox AJ; Kellman RM
Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2003; 5(6):464-9. PubMed ID: 14623682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of complications in fractures of the mandibular angle--a study with finite element computation and evaluation of data of 277 patients.
Feller KU; Schneider M; Hlawitschka M; Pfeifer G; Lauer G; Eckelt U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 31(5):290-5. PubMed ID: 14563329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hardware removal rates for mandibular angle fractures: comparing the 8-hole strut and champy plates.
Moore E; Bayrak S; Moody M; Key JM; Vural E
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 24(1):163-5. PubMed ID: 23348277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental biomechanical study of the primary stability of different osteosynthesis systems for mandibular reconstruction with an iliac crest graft.
Grohmann I; Raith S; Kesting M; Rau A; Mücke T; Lethaus B; Hölzle F; Steiner T
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):942-7. PubMed ID: 23958348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complication rate in mandibular angle fractures-one vs. two plates: a 12-year retrospective analysis.
Ferrari R; Lanzer M; Wiedemeier D; Rücker M; Bredell M
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 22(4):435-441. PubMed ID: 30327980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monocortical miniplate fixation of mandibular angle fractures.
Levy FE; Smith RW; Odland RM; Marentette LJ
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1991 Feb; 117(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 1991053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical study of the Delta plate and the TriLock Delta condyle trauma plate.
Haim D; Müller A; Leonhardt H; Nowak A; Richter G; Lauer G
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Oct; 69(10):2619-25. PubMed ID: 21474224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of condylar position in anterior mandibular fractures using 3 dimensional miniplate osteosynthesis versus conventional miniplates: Randomized clinical trial.
Mohammad OA; Ashour EM; Hassanein FAA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 50(1):61-69. PubMed ID: 34756733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment modalities for mandibular angle fractures.
Gear AJ; Apasova E; Schmitz JP; Schubert W
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 63(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 15883941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of 3D plate and locking plate in treatment of mandibular fracture-a clinical study.
Aggarwal S; Singh M; Modi P; Walia E; Aggarwal R
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 21(4):383-390. PubMed ID: 28785906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Experimental studies of the biomechanical stability of different miniplate configurations for the mandibular angle].
Schierle HP; Schmelzeisen R; Rahn B
Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1996; 41():166-70. PubMed ID: 8755434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of a multidirectional locking plate and conventional plates for the osteosynthesis of mandibular angle fractures-A preliminary study.
Zimmermann C; Henningsen A; Henkel KO; Klatt J; Jürgens C; Seide K; Kienast B
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 45(12):1913-1920. PubMed ID: 29037919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One miniplate versus two miniplates in the fixation of mandibular angle fractures. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vitkos EN; Papadopoulos KA; Dimasis P; Weissinger C; Kyrgidis A
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Nov; 123(6):e865-e873. PubMed ID: 35872351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative evaluation of a single 2.0-mm AO locking reconstruction plate with conventional miniplate osteosynthesis for treatment of linear non-comminuted fractures of symphysis and parasymphsis region of the mandible.
Hu W; Agrawal M; Thadani S; Mukul SK; Sood R; Patel A; Dhanak R; Tailor S
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Feb; 120(1):11-15. PubMed ID: 30739640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A retrospective comparative study of mandibular fracture treatment with internal fixation using reconstruction plate versus miniplates.
Sukegawa S; Kanno T; Masui M; Sukegawa-Takahashi Y; Kishimoto T; Sato A; Furuki Y
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Aug; 47(8):1175-1180. PubMed ID: 31288966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of bite force evaluation for mandibular angle fracture fixation by conventional miniplates versus new design miniplates: a clinical study.
Gamit M; Patel Y; Sood R; Vadera H; Savjani K; Bhatti Z
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 28(2):645-652. PubMed ID: 37740128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Miniplate osteosynthesis of fractures of the edentulous mandible.
Mugino H; Takagi S; Oya R; Nakamura S; Ikemura K
Clin Oral Investig; 2005 Dec; 9(4):266-70. PubMed ID: 16311742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of miniplate versus lag-screw osteosynthesis for fractures of the mandibular angle.
Schaaf H; Kaubruegge S; Streckbein P; Wilbrand JF; Kerkmann H; Howaldt HP
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jan; 111(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 20598593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
