These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26647951)

  • 1. A comparison of neck bending and flexion measurement methods for assessment of ergonomic risk.
    Zare M; Biau S; Brunet R; Gourlay A; Roquelaure Y
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2015; 21(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 26647951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Annual frequency and magnitude of neck motion in healthy individuals.
    Sterling AC; Cobian DG; Anderson PA; Heiderscheit BC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Aug; 33(17):1882-8. PubMed ID: 18670342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thoracic segmental flexion during cervical forward bending.
    Fiebert IM; Spyropoulos T; Peterman D; Dotson L
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 1993 Jan; 3(4):80-5. PubMed ID: 24573143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between flexible electrogoniometers, inclinometers and three-dimensional video analysis system for recording neck movement.
    Carnaz L; Moriguchi CS; de Oliveira AB; Santiago PR; Caurin GA; Hansson GÅ; Coury HJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2013 Nov; 35(11):1629-37. PubMed ID: 23806418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Active range of motion of the head and cervical spine: a three-dimensional investigation in healthy young adults.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Serrao G; Grassi G; Mossi E
    J Orthop Res; 2002 Jan; 20(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 11853078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intratester and intertester reliability of the Cybex electronic digital inclinometer (EDI-320) for measurement of active neck flexion and extension in healthy subjects.
    Tousignant M; Boucher N; Bourbonnais J; Gravelle T; Quesnel M; Brosseau L
    Man Ther; 2001 Nov; 6(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 11673934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Normal cervical spine range of motion in children 3-12 years old.
    Arbogast KB; Gholve PA; Friedman JE; Maltese MR; Tomasello MF; Dormans JP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):E309-15. PubMed ID: 17471079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standardized initial head position in cervical range-of-motion assessment: reliability and error analysis.
    Solinger AB; Chen J; Lantz CA
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 Jan; 23(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 10658872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lumbar spine side bending is reduced in end range extension compared to neutral and end range flexion postures.
    Ebert R; Campbell A; Kemp-Smith K; O'Sullivan P
    Man Ther; 2014 Apr; 19(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 24315299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Errors in precise examiner head placement during cervical range-of-motion measurements.
    Chen J; Lantz CA; Solinger AB
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Jun; 24(5):327-30. PubMed ID: 11416822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation.
    Ivancic PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of ex vivo flexion and extension on intervertebral foramina dimensions in the equine cervical spine.
    Sleutjens J; Voorhout G; Van Der Kolk JH; Wijnberg ID; Back W
    Equine Vet J Suppl; 2010 Nov; (38):425-30. PubMed ID: 21059040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement.
    Snyder JT; Tzermiadianos MN; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Rinella A; Dooris A; Carandang G; Renner SM; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic mobilisations in cervical flexion: Effects on intervertebral angulations.
    Clayton HM; Kaiser LJ; Lavagnino M; Stubbs NC
    Equine Vet J Suppl; 2010 Nov; (38):688-94. PubMed ID: 21059082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Video analysis of sagittal spinal posture in healthy young and older adults.
    Kuo YL; Tully EA; Galea MP
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2009; 32(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 19362231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strength of the cervical spine in compression and bending.
    Przybyla AS; Skrzypiec D; Pollintine P; Dolan P; Adams MA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):1612-20. PubMed ID: 17621208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of prismatic glasses including optometric correction on head and neck kinematics, perceived exertion and comfort during dental work in the oral cavity--a randomised controlled intervention.
    Lindegård A; Gustafsson M; Hansson GÅ
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):246-53. PubMed ID: 21664603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device.
    Audette I; Dumas JP; Côté JN; De Serres SJ
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2010 May; 40(5):318-23. PubMed ID: 20436238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Upper quadrant postural changes of school children in response to interaction with different information technologies.
    Briggs A; Straker L; Greig A
    Ergonomics; 2004 Jun; 47(7):790-819. PubMed ID: 15204289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gender difference in mobile phone use and the impact of digital device exposure on neck posture.
    Guan X; Fan G; Chen Z; Zeng Y; Zhang H; Hu A; Gu G; Wu X; Gu X; He S
    Ergonomics; 2016 Nov; 59(11):1453-1461. PubMed ID: 27046745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.