BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26648386)

  • 1. Neurosensoric disturbances after surgical removal of the mandibular third molar based on either panoramic imaging or cone beam CT scanning: A randomized controlled trial (RCT).
    Petersen LB; Vaeth M; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(2):20150224. PubMed ID: 26648386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inferior alveolar nerve sensory disturbance after impacted mandibular third molar evaluation using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography: a pilot study.
    Guerrero ME; Nackaerts O; Beinsberger J; Horner K; Schoenaers J; Jacobs R;
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 70(10):2264-70. PubMed ID: 22705219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study.
    Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(8):834-9. PubMed ID: 21507612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiographic methods used before removal of mandibular third molars among randomly selected general dental clinics.
    Matzen LH; Petersen LB; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150226. PubMed ID: 26943178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical relevance of cone beam computed tomography in mandibular third molar removal: A multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
    Ghaeminia H; Gerlach NL; Hoppenreijs TJ; Kicken M; Dings JP; Borstlap WA; de Haan T; Bergé SJ; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2158-67. PubMed ID: 26596360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Elimination of permanent injuries to the inferior alveolar nerve following surgical intervention of the "high risk" third molar.
    Umar G; Obisesan O; Bryant C; Rood JP
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 51(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 23010201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors that are associated with injury to the inferior alveolar nerve in high-risk patients after removal of third molars.
    Selvi F; Dodson TB; Nattestad A; Robertson K; Tolstunov L
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):868-73. PubMed ID: 24012054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT.
    Guerrero ME; Botetano R; Beltran J; Horner K; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):335-42. PubMed ID: 23494455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography.
    Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Bergé SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 38(9):964-71. PubMed ID: 19640685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of cone beam CT on treatment plan before surgical intervention of mandibular third molars and impact of radiographic factors on deciding on coronectomy vs surgical removal.
    Matzen LH; Christensen J; Hintze H; Schou S; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(1):98870341. PubMed ID: 22933533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography, stereo-scanography and cone beam CT for assessment of mandibular third molars before surgery.
    Hauge Matzen L; Christensen J; Hintze H; Schou S; Wenzel A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Nov; 71(6):1391-8. PubMed ID: 23356838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inferior alveolar nerve injury: Correlation between indicators of risk on panoramic radiographs and the incidence of tooth and mandibular canal contact on cone-beam computed tomography scans in a Western Australian population.
    Winstanley KL; Otway LM; Thompson L; Brook ZH; King N; Koong B; O'Halloran M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2018 Aug; 9(3):e12323. PubMed ID: 29399983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CBCT does not reduce neurosensory disturbances after third molar removal compared to panoramic radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Toledo Telles-Araújo G; Peralta-Mamani M; Caminha RDG; de Fatima Moraes-da-Silva A; Rubira CMF; Honório HM; Rubira-Bullen IRF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1137-1149. PubMed ID: 32052178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image and surgery-related costs comparing cone beam CT and panoramic imaging before removal of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Petersen LB; Olsen KR; Christensen J; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(6):20140001. PubMed ID: 24922557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does additional cone beam computed tomography decrease the risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury in high-risk cases undergoing third molar surgery?Does CBCT decrease the risk of IAN injury?
    Korkmaz YT; Kayıpmaz S; Senel FC; Atasoy KT; Gumrukcu Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 May; 46(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 28174060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic value of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in predicting mandibular nerve exposure during third molar surgery.
    Hasani A; Ahmadi Moshtaghin F; Roohi P; Rakhshan V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 46(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 27810140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury after wisdom tooth removal using 3D AI-driven models: A within-patient study.
    Picoli FF; Fontenele RC; Van der Cruyssen F; Ahmadzai I; Trigeminal Nerve Injuries Research Group ; Politis C; Silva MAG; Jacobs R
    J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104765. PubMed ID: 38353315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anatomical differences in lower third molars visualized by 2D and 3D X-ray imaging: clinical outcomes after extraction.
    Jun SH; Kim CH; Ahn JS; Padwa BL; Kwon JJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 42(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 23352698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the relationship between mandibular third molar and mandibular canal by different algorithms of cone-beam computed tomography.
    Mehdizadeh M; Ahmadi N; Jamshidi M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):740-5. PubMed ID: 25825100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cone beam CT and treatment decision of mandibular third molars: removal
    Matzen LH; Villefrance JS; Nørholt SE; Bak J; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Mar; 49(3):20190250. PubMed ID: 31778318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.