These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26649548)

  • 1. Evaluation of Performance With an Adaptive Digital Remote Microphone System and a Digital Remote Microphone Audio-Streaming Accessory System.
    Wolfe J; Duke MM; Schafer E; Jones C; Mülder HE; John A; Hudson M
    Am J Audiol; 2015 Sep; 24(3):440-50. PubMed ID: 26649548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving Hearing Performance for Cochlear Implant Recipients with Use of a Digital, Wireless, Remote-Microphone, Audio-Streaming Accessory.
    Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):532-9. PubMed ID: 26134720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a Remote Microphone System with Tri-Microphone Beamformer.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Battles J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 31429403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Benefit of Remote Microphones Using Four Wireless Protocols.
    Rodemerk KS; Galster JA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):724-731. PubMed ID: 26333880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of speech recognition with adaptive digital and FM remote microphone hearing assistance technology by listeners who use hearing aids.
    Thibodeau L
    Am J Audiol; 2014 Jun; 23(2):201-10. PubMed ID: 24699929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Potential Benefits and Limitations of Noise-Management Technologies for Children with Hearing Aids.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Miller S; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Dunn A; Browning S; Neumann S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Feb; 33(2):66-74. PubMed ID: 35512843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Speech Recognition of Cochlear Implant Recipients Using Adaptive, Digital Remote Microphone Technology and a Speech Enhancement Sound Processing Algorithm.
    Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E; Agrawal S; Koch D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):502-508. PubMed ID: 26055839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. .Signal Transparency of Remote Microphone Technology in Pediatric Bone Conduction Device Users.
    Sanchez C; Morgenstein K; Snapp H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(5):360-370. PubMed ID: 37271142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech recognition and comfort using hearing instruments with adaptive directional characteristics in asymmetric listening conditions.
    Mackenzie E; Lutman ME
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 16378001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual Differences Offer Insight Into Clinical Recommendations for Directional and Remote Microphone Technology Use in Children.
    Gustafson SJ; Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Feb; 64(2):635-650. PubMed ID: 33465321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Remote Microphone Systems for Cochlear Implant Recipients in Small Group Settings.
    Miller S; Wolfe J; Neumann S; Schafer EC; Galster J; Agrawal S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Mar; 33(3):142-148. PubMed ID: 36216041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Wireless Remote Microphone on Speech Recognition in Noise for Hearing Aid Users in China.
    Chen J; Wang Z; Dong R; Fu X; Wang Y; Wang S
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():643205. PubMed ID: 33912004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional hearing in the classroom: assistive listening devices for students with hearing impairment in a mainstream school setting.
    Zanin J; Rance G
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):723-729. PubMed ID: 27609144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a second-order directional microphone hearing aid: I. Speech perception outcomes.
    Bentler R; Palmer C; Mueller HG
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Mar; 17(3):179-89. PubMed ID: 16646278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
    Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit.
    Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):472-84. PubMed ID: 14663347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Considerations for Choosing Microphone Technologies for Students With Limited Useable Hearing Unilaterally.
    Picou EM; Davis H; Tharpe AM
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2020 Jan; 51(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 31913805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.