These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26649912)

  • 1. Discordance in Grading Methods of Aortic Stenosis by Pre-Cardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography.
    Whitener G; McKenzie J; Akushevich I; White WD; Dhakal IB; Nicoara A; Swaminathan M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Apr; 122(4):953-8. PubMed ID: 26649912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Grading Aortic Stenosis With Mean Gradient and Aortic Valve Area: A Comparison Between Preoperative Transthoracic and Precardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography.
    Whitener G; Sivak J; Akushevich I; Samad Z; Swaminathan M
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2016 Oct; 30(5):1254-9. PubMed ID: 27495962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grading Aortic Valve Stenosis With Dimensionless Index During Pre-cardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography: A Comparison With Transthoracic Echocardiography.
    Whitener GB; Shanahan PC; Wolf BJ; Finley AC
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2019 Sep; 33(9):2376-2384. PubMed ID: 31097337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normalizing arterial blood pressure in patients with aortic stenosis does not prevent grading discrepancies between pre-cardiopulmonary bypass transesophageal echocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography.
    Whitener GB; Wolf BJ; Francis LR; Heinke TL; McKinnon JS; Guldan GJ
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2023; 26(2):183-189. PubMed ID: 37706384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of grading of aortic stenosis between transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in adult patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement surgeries: A prospective observational study.
    Nanditha S; Malik V; Hasija S; Malhotra P; Sreenivas V; Chauhan S
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2019; 22(2):194-198. PubMed ID: 30971602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography.
    Alkadhi H; Wildermuth S; Plass A; Bettex D; Baumert B; Leschka S; Desbiolles LM; Marincek B; Boehm T
    Radiology; 2006 Jul; 240(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 16709791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Planar determination of the aortic valve area with transesophageal echocardiography with multiplanar probe in patients with aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Comparison with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography].
    Morelli S; De Castro S; Cartoni D; Perrone C; Beni S; Bernardo ML; Ferrante L; Giordano M
    G Ital Cardiol; 1995 Jul; 25(7):851-7. PubMed ID: 7557034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of left ventricular outflow geometry and aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional echocardiography.
    Saitoh T; Shiota M; Izumo M; Gurudevan SV; Tolstrup K; Siegel RJ; Shiota T
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1626-31. PubMed ID: 22440128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.
    Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 17630357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis.
    Minners J; Allgeier M; Gohlke-Baerwolf C; Kienzle RP; Neumann FJ; Jander N
    Eur Heart J; 2008 Apr; 29(8):1043-8. PubMed ID: 18156619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of ejection fraction and valvular regurgitation on the accuracy of aortic valve area determination.
    Berglund H; Kim CJ; Nishioka T; Luo H; Siegel RJ
    Echocardiography; 2001 Jan; 18(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11182785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aortic valve area calculation using 3D transesophageal echocardiography: Implications for aortic stenosis severity grading.
    Beneduce A; Capogrosso C; Moroni F; Ancona F; Falasconi G; Pannone L; Stella S; Ingallina G; Melillo F; Ancona MB; Romano Rt V; Palmisano A; Latib A; Colombo A; Montorfano M; Esposito A; Agricola E
    Echocardiography; 2020 Dec; 37(12):2071-2081. PubMed ID: 33026122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of aortic valve area: comparison of different methods of echocardiography with 3-D scan of the excised valve.
    Shirazi S; Golmohammadi F; Tavoosi A; Salehi M; Larti F; Sardari A; Geraiely B; Rahmanian M; Saberi K; Sattarzadeh Badkoubeh R
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Feb; 37(2):529-538. PubMed ID: 33001325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aortic valve stenosis planimetry by means of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in the real clinical setting: feasibility, reliability and systematic deviations.
    Saura D; de la Morena G; Flores-Blanco PJ; Oliva MJ; Caballero L; González-Carrillo J; Espinosa MD; López-Ruiz M; García-Navarro M; Valdés M
    Echocardiography; 2015 Mar; 32(3):508-15. PubMed ID: 25041359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography.
    Malyar NM; Schlosser T; Barkhausen J; Gutersohn A; Buck T; Bartel T; Erbel R
    Cardiology; 2008; 109(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 17713328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies in patients with apparently normal left ventricular function.
    Minners J; Allgeier M; Gohlke-Baerwolf C; Kienzle RP; Neumann FJ; Jander N
    Heart; 2010 Sep; 96(18):1463-8. PubMed ID: 20813727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discordant Grading of Aortic Stenosis Severity: Echocardiographic Predictors of Survival Benefit Associated With Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Berthelot-Richer M; Pibarot P; Capoulade R; Dumesnil JG; Dahou A; Thebault C; Le Ven F; Clavel MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):797-805. PubMed ID: 27209111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of aortic valve area at 256-slice computed tomography: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and cardiac catheterization in subjects with high-grade aortic valve stenosis prior to percutaneous valve replacement.
    Klass O; Walker MJ; Olszewski ME; Bahner J; Feuerlein S; Hoffmann MH; Lang A
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Oct; 80(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 20832221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of three-dimensional echocardiography on classification of the severity of aortic stenosis.
    Jainandunsing JS; Mahmood F; Matyal R; Shakil O; Hess PE; Lee J; Panzica PJ; Khabbaz KR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Oct; 96(4):1343-1348. PubMed ID: 23891412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.