BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26649912)

  • 1. Discordance in Grading Methods of Aortic Stenosis by Pre-Cardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography.
    Whitener G; McKenzie J; Akushevich I; White WD; Dhakal IB; Nicoara A; Swaminathan M
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Apr; 122(4):953-8. PubMed ID: 26649912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Grading Aortic Stenosis With Mean Gradient and Aortic Valve Area: A Comparison Between Preoperative Transthoracic and Precardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography.
    Whitener G; Sivak J; Akushevich I; Samad Z; Swaminathan M
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2016 Oct; 30(5):1254-9. PubMed ID: 27495962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grading Aortic Valve Stenosis With Dimensionless Index During Pre-cardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography: A Comparison With Transthoracic Echocardiography.
    Whitener GB; Shanahan PC; Wolf BJ; Finley AC
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2019 Sep; 33(9):2376-2384. PubMed ID: 31097337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normalizing arterial blood pressure in patients with aortic stenosis does not prevent grading discrepancies between pre-cardiopulmonary bypass transesophageal echocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography.
    Whitener GB; Wolf BJ; Francis LR; Heinke TL; McKinnon JS; Guldan GJ
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2023; 26(2):183-189. PubMed ID: 37706384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of grading of aortic stenosis between transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in adult patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement surgeries: A prospective observational study.
    Nanditha S; Malik V; Hasija S; Malhotra P; Sreenivas V; Chauhan S
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2019; 22(2):194-198. PubMed ID: 30971602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography.
    Alkadhi H; Wildermuth S; Plass A; Bettex D; Baumert B; Leschka S; Desbiolles LM; Marincek B; Boehm T
    Radiology; 2006 Jul; 240(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 16709791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Planar determination of the aortic valve area with transesophageal echocardiography with multiplanar probe in patients with aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Comparison with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography].
    Morelli S; De Castro S; Cartoni D; Perrone C; Beni S; Bernardo ML; Ferrante L; Giordano M
    G Ital Cardiol; 1995 Jul; 25(7):851-7. PubMed ID: 7557034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of left ventricular outflow geometry and aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional echocardiography.
    Saitoh T; Shiota M; Izumo M; Gurudevan SV; Tolstrup K; Siegel RJ; Shiota T
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1626-31. PubMed ID: 22440128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.
    Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 17630357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis.
    Minners J; Allgeier M; Gohlke-Baerwolf C; Kienzle RP; Neumann FJ; Jander N
    Eur Heart J; 2008 Apr; 29(8):1043-8. PubMed ID: 18156619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of ejection fraction and valvular regurgitation on the accuracy of aortic valve area determination.
    Berglund H; Kim CJ; Nishioka T; Luo H; Siegel RJ
    Echocardiography; 2001 Jan; 18(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11182785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aortic valve area calculation using 3D transesophageal echocardiography: Implications for aortic stenosis severity grading.
    Beneduce A; Capogrosso C; Moroni F; Ancona F; Falasconi G; Pannone L; Stella S; Ingallina G; Melillo F; Ancona MB; Romano Rt V; Palmisano A; Latib A; Colombo A; Montorfano M; Esposito A; Agricola E
    Echocardiography; 2020 Dec; 37(12):2071-2081. PubMed ID: 33026122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of aortic valve area: comparison of different methods of echocardiography with 3-D scan of the excised valve.
    Shirazi S; Golmohammadi F; Tavoosi A; Salehi M; Larti F; Sardari A; Geraiely B; Rahmanian M; Saberi K; Sattarzadeh Badkoubeh R
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Feb; 37(2):529-538. PubMed ID: 33001325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aortic valve stenosis planimetry by means of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in the real clinical setting: feasibility, reliability and systematic deviations.
    Saura D; de la Morena G; Flores-Blanco PJ; Oliva MJ; Caballero L; González-Carrillo J; Espinosa MD; López-Ruiz M; García-Navarro M; Valdés M
    Echocardiography; 2015 Mar; 32(3):508-15. PubMed ID: 25041359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography.
    Malyar NM; Schlosser T; Barkhausen J; Gutersohn A; Buck T; Bartel T; Erbel R
    Cardiology; 2008; 109(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 17713328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies in patients with apparently normal left ventricular function.
    Minners J; Allgeier M; Gohlke-Baerwolf C; Kienzle RP; Neumann FJ; Jander N
    Heart; 2010 Sep; 96(18):1463-8. PubMed ID: 20813727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discordant Grading of Aortic Stenosis Severity: Echocardiographic Predictors of Survival Benefit Associated With Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Berthelot-Richer M; Pibarot P; Capoulade R; Dumesnil JG; Dahou A; Thebault C; Le Ven F; Clavel MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):797-805. PubMed ID: 27209111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of aortic valve area at 256-slice computed tomography: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and cardiac catheterization in subjects with high-grade aortic valve stenosis prior to percutaneous valve replacement.
    Klass O; Walker MJ; Olszewski ME; Bahner J; Feuerlein S; Hoffmann MH; Lang A
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Oct; 80(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 20832221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of three-dimensional echocardiography on classification of the severity of aortic stenosis.
    Jainandunsing JS; Mahmood F; Matyal R; Shakil O; Hess PE; Lee J; Panzica PJ; Khabbaz KR
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Oct; 96(4):1343-1348. PubMed ID: 23891412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.