BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26649912)

  • 21. Assessment of Paravalvular Leak After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Transesophageal Echocardiography Compared With Transthoracic Echocardiography.
    Teeter EG; Dakik C; Cooter M; Samad Z; Ghadimi K; Harrison JK; Gaca J; Stafford-Smith M; Bottiger BA
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2017 Aug; 31(4):1278-1284. PubMed ID: 28800985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography.
    Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vancraeynest D; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Dec; 26(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 17968960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: anesthetic considerations.
    Billings FT; Kodali SK; Shanewise JS
    Anesth Analg; 2009 May; 108(5):1453-62. PubMed ID: 19372319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intraoperative Transesophageal and Postoperative Transthoracic Echocardiographic Evaluation of a Mechanical Heart Valve Prosthesis Implanted at Aortic Position.
    Babu S; Sreedhar R; Gadhinglajkar SV; Dash PK; Sukesan S; Pillai V; Panicker VT; Shriram LP; Aggarwal N
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2018 Apr; 32(2):782-789. PubMed ID: 29217244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of the aortic valve stenosis: an in vivo and ex vivo study.
    Buchner S; Debl K; Schmid FX; Luchner A; Djavidani B
    BMC Med Imaging; 2015 Aug; 15():34. PubMed ID: 26306577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tricuspid Regurgitation Is Associated With Increased Risk of Mortality in Patients With Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis and Reduced Ejection Fraction: Results of the Multicenter TOPAS Study (True or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis).
    Dahou A; Magne J; Clavel MA; Capoulade R; Bartko PE; Bergler-Klein J; Sénéchal M; Mundigler G; Burwash I; Ribeiro HB; O'Connor K; Mathieu P; Baumgartner H; Dumesnil JG; Rosenhek R; Larose E; Rodés-Cabau J; Pibarot P
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(4):588-96. PubMed ID: 25819185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of accuracy of aortic valve area assessment in aortic stenosis by real time three-dimensional echocardiography in biplane mode versus two-dimensional transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.
    Blot-Souletie N; Hébrard A; Acar P; Carrié D; Puel J
    Echocardiography; 2007 Nov; 24(10):1065-72. PubMed ID: 18001360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Non-invasive and invasive evaluation of aortic valve area in 100 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: comparison of cardiac computed tomography with ECHO (transesophageal/transthoracic) and catheter examination.
    Anger T; Bauer V; Plachtzik C; Geisler T; Gawaz MP; Oberhoff M; Höher M
    J Cardiol; 2014 Mar; 63(3):189-97. PubMed ID: 24060524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic determination of aortic valve area in adults with aortic stenosis.
    Stoddard MF; Arce J; Liddell NE; Peters G; Dillon S; Kupersmith J
    Am Heart J; 1991 Nov; 122(5):1415-22. PubMed ID: 1951006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Complete Transesophageal Assessment of the Aortic Valve Using the Continuity Equation in Equivocal Cases of Aortic Stenosis.
    Moady G; Serhan M; Atar S; Shturman A
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2023 Nov; 25(11):747-751. PubMed ID: 37980620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Absolute assessment of aortic valve stenosis by planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterisation.
    Reant P; Lederlin M; Lafitte S; Serri K; Montaudon M; Corneloup O; Roudaut R; Laurent F
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Aug; 59(2):276-83. PubMed ID: 16873006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging of aortic valve stenosis and aortic root to multimodality imaging for selection of transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates.
    Paelinck BP; Van Herck PL; Rodrigus I; Claeys MJ; Laborde JC; Parizel PM; Vrints CJ; Bosmans JM
    Am J Cardiol; 2011 Jul; 108(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 21529729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prosthesis sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation--comparison of three dimensional transesophageal echocardiography with multislice computed tomography.
    Husser O; Holzamer A; Resch M; Endemann DH; Nunez J; Bodi V; Schmid C; Riegger GA; Gössmann H; Hamer O; Stroszczynski C; Luchner A; Hilker M; Hengstenberg C
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 168(4):3431-8. PubMed ID: 23688431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The feasibility of epicardial echocardiography for measuring aortic valve area by the continuity equation.
    Hilberath JN; Shernan SK; Segal S; Smith B; Eltzschig HK
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan; 108(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 19095825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Grading of aortic stenosis severity: a head-to-head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography.
    Mantini C; Di Giammarco G; Pizzicannella J; Gallina S; Ricci F; D'Ugo E; Marchetti M; Cotroneo AR; Ahmed N; Bucciarelli-Ducci C; Tartaro A; De Caterina R
    Radiol Med; 2018 Sep; 123(9):643-654. PubMed ID: 29730841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study.
    Clavel MA; Messika-Zeitoun D; Pibarot P; Aggarwal SR; Malouf J; Araoz PA; Michelena HI; Cueff C; Larose E; Capoulade R; Vahanian A; Enriquez-Sarano M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 62(24):2329-38. PubMed ID: 24076528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Grading of aortic valve stenosis at 64-slice spiral computed tomography: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography and calibration against cardiac catheterization.
    Lembcke A; Woinke M; Borges AC; Dohmen PM; Lachnitt A; Westermann Y; Geigenmueller A; Hermann KG; Butler C; Thiele H; Kivelitz DE
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jun; 44(6):360-8. PubMed ID: 19412115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of obesity and nonobesity on grading the severity of aortic valve stenosis.
    Rogge BP; Gerdts E; Cramariuc D; Bahlmann E; Jander N; Gohlke-Bärwolf C; Pedersen TR; Lønnebakken MT
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 May; 113(9):1532-5. PubMed ID: 24630788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Integration of 3D imaging data in the assessment of aortic stenosis: impact on classification of disease severity.
    O'Brien B; Schoenhagen P; Kapadia SR; Svensson LG; Rodriguez L; Griffin BP; Tuzcu EM; Desai MY
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Sep; 4(5):566-73. PubMed ID: 21737600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantification of aortic stenosis in mechanically ventilated patients using multiplane transesophageal Doppler echocardiography.
    Blumberg FC; Pfeifer M; Holmer SR; Kromer EP; Riegger GA; Elsner D
    Chest; 1998 Jul; 114(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 9674453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.