359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26650252)
1. Chronic atomoxetine treatment during adolescence does not influence decision-making on a rodent gambling task, but does modulate amphetamine's effect on impulsive action in adulthood.
Silveira MM; Murch WS; Clark L; Winstanley CA
Behav Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 27(4):350-63. PubMed ID: 26650252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Scopolamine and amphetamine produce similar decision-making deficits on a rat gambling task via independent pathways.
Silveira MM; Malcolm E; Shoaib M; Winstanley CA
Behav Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 281():86-95. PubMed ID: 25529186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chronic atomoxetine treatment during adolescence decreases impulsive choice, but not impulsive action, in adult rats and alters markers of synaptic plasticity in the orbitofrontal cortex.
Sun H; Cocker PJ; Zeeb FD; Winstanley CA
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2012 Jan; 219(2):285-301. PubMed ID: 21809008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrasting effects of d-amphetamine and atomoxetine on measures of impulsive action and choice.
Higgins GA; Brown M; MacMillan C; Silenieks LB; Thevarkunnel S
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2021 Aug; 207():173220. PubMed ID: 34175329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Noradrenergic contributions to cue-driven risk-taking and impulsivity.
Chernoff CS; Hynes TJ; Winstanley CA
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2021 Jul; 238(7):1765-1779. PubMed ID: 33649970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subchronic administration of atomoxetine causes an enduring reduction in context-induced relapse to cocaine seeking without affecting impulsive decision making.
Broos N; Loonstra R; van Mourik Y; Schetters D; Schoffelmeer AN; Pattij T; De Vries TJ
Addict Biol; 2015 Jul; 20(4):714-23. PubMed ID: 25056833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differential effects of environmental enrichment, social-housing, and isolation-rearing on a rat gambling task: dissociations between impulsive action and risky decision-making.
Zeeb FD; Wong AC; Winstanley CA
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2013 Jan; 225(2):381-95. PubMed ID: 22864967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simultaneous blockade of dopamine and noradrenaline reuptake promotes disadvantageous decision making in a rat gambling task.
Baarendse PJ; Winstanley CA; Vanderschuren LJ
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2013 Feb; 225(3):719-31. PubMed ID: 22968659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential effects of d-amphetamine and atomoxetine on risk-based decision making of Lewis and Fischer 344 rats.
Ozga-Hess JE; Anderson KG
Behav Pharmacol; 2019 Oct; 30(7):605-616. PubMed ID: 31503070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of 5-HT
Higgins GA; Brown M; St John J; MacMillan C; Silenieks LB; Thevarkunnel S
Neuropharmacology; 2020 Jun; 170():108064. PubMed ID: 32222404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noradrenergic regulation of cue-guided decision making and impulsivity is doubly dissociable across frontal brain regions.
Chernoff CS; Hynes TJ; Schumacher JD; Ramaiah S; Avramidis DK; Mortazavi L; Floresco SB; Winstanley CA
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2024 Apr; 241(4):767-783. PubMed ID: 38001266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pharmacological evidence of a cholinergic contribution to elevated impulsivity and risky decision-making caused by adding win-paired cues to a rat gambling task.
Betts GD; Hynes TJ; Winstanley CA
J Psychopharmacol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):701-712. PubMed ID: 33573446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anticonvulsant medications attenuate amphetamine-induced deficits in behavioral inhibition but not decision making under risk on a rat gambling task.
Tremblay M; Winstanley CA
Behav Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 314():143-51. PubMed ID: 27515288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term deficits in risky decision-making after traumatic brain injury on a rat analog of the Iowa gambling task.
Shaver TK; Ozga JE; Zhu B; Anderson KG; Martens KM; Vonder Haar C
Brain Res; 2019 Feb; 1704():103-113. PubMed ID: 30296430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of amphetamine, methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and morphine in rats responding under an adjusting stop signal reaction time task.
Maguire DR; France CP
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2019 Jun; 236(6):1959-1972. PubMed ID: 30798404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Similar effects of the selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine on three distinct forms of impulsivity in the rat.
Robinson ES; Eagle DM; Mar AC; Bari A; Banerjee G; Jiang X; Dalley JW; Robbins TW
Neuropsychopharmacology; 2008 Apr; 33(5):1028-37. PubMed ID: 17637611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monoaminergic modulation of decision-making under risk of punishment in a rat model.
Blaes SL; Orsini CA; Mitchell MR; Spurrell MS; Betzhold SM; Vera K; Bizon JL; Setlow B
Behav Pharmacol; 2018 Dec; 29(8):745-761. PubMed ID: 30394882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of atomoxetine on attention and impulsivity in the five-choice serial reaction time task in rats with lesions of dorsal noradrenergic ascending bundle.
Liu YP; Huang TS; Tung CS; Lin CC
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2015 Jan; 56():81-90. PubMed ID: 25151304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dopaminergic modulation of sensitivity to immediate and delayed punishment during decision-making.
Minnes GL; Wiener AJ; Liley AE; Simon NW
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2024 Apr; 24(2):304-321. PubMed ID: 38052746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of atomoxetine and methylphenidate on attention and impulsivity in the 5-choice serial reaction time test.
Navarra R; Graf R; Huang Y; Logue S; Comery T; Hughes Z; Day M
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2008 Jan; 32(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 17714843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]