These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26650376)

  • 1. Audiometric Thresholds: Stimulus Considerations in Sound Field and Under Earphones.
    Norrix LW; Anderson A
    Am J Audiol; 2015 Dec; 24(4):487-93. PubMed ID: 26650376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ABR thresholds to tonebursts gated with Blackman and linear windows in adults with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Purdy SC; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):358-68. PubMed ID: 12195178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of audiometric configuration on pure-tone, warble-tone and narrow-band noise thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing losses.
    Stephens MM; Rintelmann WF
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(5):221-6. PubMed ID: 659294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing pure-, pulsed, and warbled tone thresholds in adults at 3000 and 6000 Hz.
    Franklin CA; Franklin TC; Franklin JL
    Am J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 20(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 21474558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pure tone auditory thresholds can change according to duration of interrupted tones in patients with psychogenic hearing loss.
    Oishi N; Inoue Y; Hori A; Yakushimaru R; Kohno N; Ogawa K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):628-32. PubMed ID: 21254959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of audiometric configuration on speech-band thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss subjects.
    Surr RK; Seidman JH; Schwartz DM; Mueller HG
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(5):246-50. PubMed ID: 7141137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A comparison of low-chirp- and notched-noise-evoked auditory brainstem response].
    Mühlenberg L; Schade G
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Aug; 91(8):500-4. PubMed ID: 22135225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Equivalence and test-retest reproducibility of conventional and extended-high-frequency audiometric thresholds obtained using pure-tone and narrow-band-noise stimuli.
    John AB; Kreisman BM
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Sep; 56(9):635-642. PubMed ID: 28388868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aided and unaided narrow band noise thresholds in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Garstecki DC; Bode DL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(6):258-62. PubMed ID: 931761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Earphones in extended high-frequency audiometry and ISO 389-5.
    Rodríguez Valiente A; García Berrocal JR; Roldán Fidalgo A; Trinidad A; Ramírez Camacho R
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):595-603. PubMed ID: 24793886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating Hearing Thresholds in Hearing-Impaired Adults through Objective Detection of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials.
    Van Dun B; Dillon H; Seeto M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):370-83. PubMed ID: 25879241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Steady-state response audiometry in a group of patients with steeply sloping sensorineural hearing loss.
    Ballay C; Tonini R; Waninger T; Yoon C; Manolidis S
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jul; 115(7):1243-6. PubMed ID: 15995514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A history of occupational noise exposure is associated with steep-slope audiograms and poorer self-reported hearing-aid outcomes.
    Houmøller SS; Tsai LT; Wolff A; Kaithali Narayanan S; Hougaard DD; Gaihede M; Hammershøi D; Neher T; Godballe C; Schmidt JH
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Oct; 63(10):772-784. PubMed ID: 37909290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal intraspeech masking of plosive bursts: effects of hearing loss and frequency shaping.
    Mackersie CL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):554-63. PubMed ID: 17538099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A version of the TEN Test for use with ER-3A insert earphones.
    Moore BC; Creeke S; Glasberg BR; Stone MA; Sek A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):554-7. PubMed ID: 22436409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship of audiometric thresholds elicited with pulsed, warbled, and pulsed-warbled tones in adults with normal hearing.
    Franklin C; Johnson K; Smith-Olinde L; Nicholson N
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 19390442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus and transducer effects on threshold.
    Flamme GA; Geda K; McGregor KD; Wyllys K; Deiters KK; Murphy WJ; Stephenson MR
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54 Suppl 1(0 1):S19-29. PubMed ID: 25549164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.