176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26650376)
1. Audiometric Thresholds: Stimulus Considerations in Sound Field and Under Earphones.
Norrix LW; Anderson A
Am J Audiol; 2015 Dec; 24(4):487-93. PubMed ID: 26650376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ABR thresholds to tonebursts gated with Blackman and linear windows in adults with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Purdy SC; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):358-68. PubMed ID: 12195178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of audiometric configuration on pure-tone, warble-tone and narrow-band noise thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing losses.
Stephens MM; Rintelmann WF
J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(5):221-6. PubMed ID: 659294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing pure-, pulsed, and warbled tone thresholds in adults at 3000 and 6000 Hz.
Franklin CA; Franklin TC; Franklin JL
Am J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 20(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 21474558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pure tone auditory thresholds can change according to duration of interrupted tones in patients with psychogenic hearing loss.
Oishi N; Inoue Y; Hori A; Yakushimaru R; Kohno N; Ogawa K
Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):628-32. PubMed ID: 21254959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of audiometric configuration on speech-band thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss subjects.
Surr RK; Seidman JH; Schwartz DM; Mueller HG
Ear Hear; 1982; 3(5):246-50. PubMed ID: 7141137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [A comparison of low-chirp- and notched-noise-evoked auditory brainstem response].
Mühlenberg L; Schade G
Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Aug; 91(8):500-4. PubMed ID: 22135225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Equivalence and test-retest reproducibility of conventional and extended-high-frequency audiometric thresholds obtained using pure-tone and narrow-band-noise stimuli.
John AB; Kreisman BM
Int J Audiol; 2017 Sep; 56(9):635-642. PubMed ID: 28388868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aided and unaided narrow band noise thresholds in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment.
Garstecki DC; Bode DL
J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(6):258-62. PubMed ID: 931761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Earphones in extended high-frequency audiometry and ISO 389-5.
Rodríguez Valiente A; García Berrocal JR; Roldán Fidalgo A; Trinidad A; Ramírez Camacho R
Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):595-603. PubMed ID: 24793886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating Hearing Thresholds in Hearing-Impaired Adults through Objective Detection of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials.
Van Dun B; Dillon H; Seeto M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):370-83. PubMed ID: 25879241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Steady-state response audiometry in a group of patients with steeply sloping sensorineural hearing loss.
Ballay C; Tonini R; Waninger T; Yoon C; Manolidis S
Laryngoscope; 2005 Jul; 115(7):1243-6. PubMed ID: 15995514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal intraspeech masking of plosive bursts: effects of hearing loss and frequency shaping.
Mackersie CL
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):554-63. PubMed ID: 17538099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A version of the TEN Test for use with ER-3A insert earphones.
Moore BC; Creeke S; Glasberg BR; Stone MA; Sek A
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):554-7. PubMed ID: 22436409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The relationship of audiometric thresholds elicited with pulsed, warbled, and pulsed-warbled tones in adults with normal hearing.
Franklin C; Johnson K; Smith-Olinde L; Nicholson N
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 19390442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stimulus and transducer effects on threshold.
Flamme GA; Geda K; McGregor KD; Wyllys K; Deiters KK; Murphy WJ; Stephenson MR
Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54 Suppl 1(0 1):S19-29. PubMed ID: 25549164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
