173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26650652)
1. Influence of Test Condition on Speech Perception With Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Dillon MT; Buss E; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Pillsbury HC
Am J Audiol; 2015 Dec; 24(4):520-8. PubMed ID: 26650652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of hearing aid settings for electric-acoustic stimulation.
Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Adunka MC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 24828214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fundamental frequency information for speech recognition via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other.
Shpak T; Most T; Luntz M
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 24141594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Outcomes in Children.
Park LR; Teagle HFB; Gagnon E; Woodard J; Brown KD
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 30252685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison.
Rader T; Adel Y; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hearing preservation and speech perception outcomes with electric-acoustic stimulation after 12 months of listening experience.
Adunka OF; Dillon MT; Adunka MC; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
Laryngoscope; 2013 Oct; 123(10):2509-15. PubMed ID: 23918623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation : Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions].
Rader T
HNO; 2015 Feb; 63(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 25515123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty.
Gifford RH; Davis TJ; Sunderhaus LW; Menapace C; Buck B; Crosson J; O'Neill L; Beiter A; Segel P
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):539-553. PubMed ID: 28301392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception.
Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicenter US Clinical Trial With an Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) System in Adults: Final Outcomes.
Pillsbury HC; Dillon MT; Buchman CA; Staecker H; Prentiss SM; Ruckenstein MJ; Bigelow DC; Telischi FF; Martinez DM; Runge CL; Friedland DR; Blevins NH; Larky JB; Alexiades G; Kaylie DM; Roland PS; Miyamoto RT; Backous DD; Warren FM; El-Kashlan HK; Slager HK; Reyes C; Racey AI; Adunka OF
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Mar; 39(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 29342054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth and Configuration of Hearing Loss on Bimodal Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.
Neuman AC; Zeman A; Neukam J; Wang B; Svirsky MA
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):621-635. PubMed ID: 30067559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicenter clinical trial of the Nucleus Hybrid S8 cochlear implant: Final outcomes.
Gantz BJ; Dunn C; Oleson J; Hansen M; Parkinson A; Turner C
Laryngoscope; 2016 Apr; 126(4):962-73. PubMed ID: 26756395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of frequency compression by cochlear implant recipients with postoperative acoustic hearing.
McDermott H; Henshall K
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jun; 21(6):380-9. PubMed ID: 20701835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of Removing Low-Frequency Electric Information on Speech Perception With Bimodal Hearing.
Fowler JR; Eggleston JL; Reavis KM; McMillan GP; Reiss LA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 59(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 26535803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acceptance and Benefits of Electro-Acoustic Stimulation for Conventional-Length Electrode Arrays.
Spitzer ER; Waltzman SB; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR
Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 32721977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of Wireless Contralateral Routing of Signal Technology in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users with Bilateral Profound Hearing Loss.
Snapp HA; Hoffer ME; Spahr A; Rajguru S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):579-589. PubMed ID: 30541657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
