These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26651239)

  • 41. How Mendel's Interest in Inheritance Grew out of Plant Improvement.
    van Dijk PJ; Weissing FJ; Ellis THN
    Genetics; 2018 Oct; 210(2):347-355. PubMed ID: 30287513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Modern physiology vindicates Darwin's dream.
    Noble D
    Exp Physiol; 2022 Sep; 107(9):1015-1028. PubMed ID: 35871280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Darwin's Pangenesis and the Lamarckian Inheritance of Acquired Characters.
    Liu Y
    Adv Genet; 2018; 101():115-144. PubMed ID: 30037391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Fisher's contributions to genetics and heredity, with special emphasis on the Gregor Mendel controversy.
    Piegorsch WW
    Biometrics; 1990 Dec; 46(4):915-24. PubMed ID: 2085640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Mendel's pea crosses: varieties, traits and statistics.
    Ellis THN; Hofer JMI; Swain MT; van Dijk PJ
    Hereditas; 2019; 156():33. PubMed ID: 31695583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Speciation by physiological selection of environmentally acquired traits.
    Noble D; Phillips D
    J Physiol; 2024 Jun; 602(11):2503-2510. PubMed ID: 38160438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. 'Further Development' of Mendel's legacy? Erich von Tschermak-Seysenegg in the context of Mendelian-biometry controversy, 1901-1906.
    Simunek M; Hoßfeld U; Breidbach O
    Theory Biosci; 2012 Dec; 131(4):243-52. PubMed ID: 22855371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Darwin and sexual selection: One hundred years of misunderstanding.
    Veuille M
    C R Biol; 2010 Feb; 333(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 20338531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Historical study: Johann Gregor Mendel 1822-1884.
    Weiling F
    Am J Med Genet; 1991 Jul; 40(1):1-25; discussion 26. PubMed ID: 1887835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Variation under domestication in plants: 1859 and today.
    Brown AH
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2010 Aug; 365(1552):2523-30. PubMed ID: 20643742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Science beyond boundary: are premature discoveries things of the past?
    Singh RS
    Genome; 2016 Jun; 59(6):433-7. PubMed ID: 27228359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The challenge of instinctive behaviour and Darwin's theory of evolution.
    Gordillo-García A
    Endeavour; 2016 Mar; 40(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 26839263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Further evidence for Darwin's pangenesis.
    Liu Y
    Riv Biol; 2004; 97(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 15648210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mendel and modern genetics: the legacy for today.
    Allen GE
    Endeavour; 2003 Jun; 27(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 12798810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Why didn't Darwin discover Mendel's laws?
    Howard JC
    J Biol; 2009; 8(2):15. PubMed ID: 19291260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Seeds of doubt: Mendel's choice of Hieracium to study inheritance, a case of right plant, wrong trait.
    Bicknell R; Catanach A; Hand M; Koltunow A
    Theor Appl Genet; 2016 Dec; 129(12):2253-2266. PubMed ID: 27695890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Darwin's evolutionary philosophy: the laws of change.
    Reed ES
    Acta Biotheor; 1978; 27(3-4):201-35. PubMed ID: 107689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Epididymosomes: the black box of Darwin's pangenesis?
    Nejabati HR; Shahnazi V; Faridvand Y; Fathi-Maroufi N; Bahrami-Asl Z; Nikanfar S; Nouri M
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2021 Feb; 27(2):. PubMed ID: 33313916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The history and reception of Charles Darwin's hypothesis of pangenesis.
    Holterhoff K
    J Hist Biol; 2014; 47(4):661-95. PubMed ID: 24570302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Gregor Mendel and the theory of species multiplication.
    van Dijk PJ; Noel Ellis TH
    Genetics; 2023 May; 224(2):. PubMed ID: 36943805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.