BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26651985)

  • 1. A correction factor for the impact of cluster randomized sampling and its applications.
    Cousineau D; Laurencelle L
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):121-35. PubMed ID: 26651985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size calculation for treatment effects in randomized trials with fixed cluster sizes and heterogeneous intraclass correlations and variances.
    Candel MJ; van Breukelen GJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Oct; 24(5):557-73. PubMed ID: 25519890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Planning sample sizes when effect sizes are uncertain: The power-calibrated effect size approach.
    McShane BB; Böckenholt U
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 26651984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite population correction for two-level hierarchical linear models.
    Lai MHC; Kwok OM; Hsiao YY; Cao Q
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Mar; 23(1):94-112. PubMed ID: 28301201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confidence intervals for the population mean tailored to small sample sizes, with applications to survey sampling.
    Rosenblum MA; Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2009 Jan; 5(1):Article 4. PubMed ID: 20231867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative efficiency and sample size for cluster randomized trials with variable cluster sizes.
    You Z; Williams OD; Aban I; Kabagambe EK; Tiwari HK; Cutter G
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 21163852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient design of cluster randomized and multicentre trials with unknown intraclass correlation.
    van Breukelen GJ; Candel MJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Oct; 24(5):540-56. PubMed ID: 21937473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of heterogeneous variance on efficiency and power of cluster randomized trials with a balanced 2 × 2 factorial design.
    Lemme F; van Breukelen GJ; Candel MJ; Berger MP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Oct; 24(5):574-93. PubMed ID: 25911332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power, effects, confidence, and significance: an investigation of statistical practices in nursing research.
    Gaskin CJ; Happell B
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2014 May; 51(5):795-806. PubMed ID: 24207028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of methods to analyse continuous data from pseudo cluster randomized trials.
    Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; Melis RJ; Borm GF
    Stat Med; 2007 Sep; 26(22):4100-15. PubMed ID: 17328006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
    Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robustness of parameter and standard error estimates against ignoring a contextual effect of a subject-level covariate in cluster-randomized trials.
    Korendijk EJ; Hox JJ; Moerbeek M; Maas CJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Dec; 43(4):1003-13. PubMed ID: 21512874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correcting an analysis of variance for clustering.
    Hedges LV; Rhoads CH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Feb; 64(Pt 1):20-37. PubMed ID: 21506943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative efficiency of unequal versus equal cluster sizes in cluster randomized and multicentre trials.
    van Breukelen GJ; Candel MJ; Berger MP
    Stat Med; 2007 Jun; 26(13):2589-603. PubMed ID: 17094074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confidence interval-based sample size determination formulas and some mathematical properties for hierarchical data.
    Usami S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():1-31. PubMed ID: 31493344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Calculating sample sizes for cluster randomized trials: we can keep it simple and efficient!
    van Breukelen GJ; Candel MJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1212-8. PubMed ID: 23017638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
    Ukoumunne OC
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Non-parametric Bootstrap estimation on the intraclass correlation coefficient generated from quantitative hierarchical data].
    Liang R; Zhou SD; Li LX; Zhang JG; Gao YH
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 34(9):927-30. PubMed ID: 24331973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multilevel analysis quantifies variation in the experimental effect while optimizing power and preventing false positives.
    Aarts E; Dolan CV; Verhage M; van der Sluis S
    BMC Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 16():94. PubMed ID: 26685825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modelling the hierarchical structure in datasets with very small clusters: a simulation study to explore the effect of the proportion of clusters when the outcome is continuous.
    Sauzet O; Wright KC; Marston L; Brocklehurst P; Peacock JL
    Stat Med; 2013 Apr; 32(8):1429-38. PubMed ID: 23027676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.