These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26654089)

  • 21. Quantitative assessment of similarity between randomly acquired characteristics on high quality exemplars and crime scene impressions via analysis of feature size and shape.
    Richetelli N; Nobel M; Bodziak WJ; Speir JA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jan; 270():211-222. PubMed ID: 27838107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contextual bias on decision-making in forensic toxicology: First survey from China.
    He N; Wang L; Hao H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Apr; 333():111232. PubMed ID: 35176676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Activity level DNA evidence evaluation: On propositions addressing the actor or the activity.
    Kokshoorn B; Blankers BJ; de Zoete J; Berger CEH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():115-124. PubMed ID: 28715673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Eye tracking to evaluate evidence recognition in crime scene investigations.
    Watalingam RD; Richetelli N; Pelz JB; Speir JA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Nov; 280():64-80. PubMed ID: 28961443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fingermark age determinations: Legal considerations, review of the literature and practical propositions.
    Girod A; Ramotowski R; Lambrechts S; Misrielal P; Aalders M; Weyermann C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():212-26. PubMed ID: 27044033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation.
    Meuwly D; Ramos D; Haraksim R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jul; 276():142-153. PubMed ID: 27181589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dependence among randomly acquired characteristics on shoeprints and their features.
    Kaplan Damary N; Mandel M; Wiesner S; Yekutieli Y; Shor Y; Spiegelman C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Feb; 283():173-179. PubMed ID: 29324348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Global survey on evaluative reporting on DNA evidence with regard to activity-level propositions.
    Prinz M; Pirtle D; Oldoni F
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 May; 69(3):798-813. PubMed ID: 38351537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Equal prior probabilities: can one do any better?
    Biedermann A; Taroni F; Garbolino P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Oct; 172(2-3):85-93. PubMed ID: 17267153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of AFIS for linking scenes of crime.
    Hefetz I; Liptz Y; Vaturi S; Attias D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 May; 262():e25-7. PubMed ID: 26996923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using case specific experiments to evaluate fingermarks on knives given activity level propositions.
    de Ronde A; Kokshoorn B; de Puit M; de Poot CJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110710. PubMed ID: 33561790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Statistical discrimination of footwear: a method for the comparison of accidentals on shoe outsoles inspired by facial recognition techniques.
    Petraco ND; Gambino C; Kubic TA; Olivio D; Petraco N
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 19895540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Lay understanding of forensic statistics: Evaluation of random match probabilities, likelihood ratios, and verbal equivalents.
    Thompson WC; Newman EJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Aug; 39(4):332-49. PubMed ID: 25984887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Practical relevance of pattern uniqueness in forensic science.
    Jayaprakash PT
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Sep; 231(1-3):403.e1-16. PubMed ID: 23849815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quantifying randomly acquired characteristics on outsoles in terms of shape and position.
    Speir JA; Richetelli N; Fagert M; Hite M; Bodziak WJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Sep; 266():399-411. PubMed ID: 27416269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Decision analysis in forensic science.
    Taroni F; Bozza S; Aitken C
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jul; 50(4):894-905. PubMed ID: 16078494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of forensic findings when alternative explanations have different likelihoods-"Blame-the-brother"-syndrome.
    Nordgaard A; Hedell R; Ansell R
    Sci Justice; 2012 Dec; 52(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 23068773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The interpretation of shoeprint comparison class correspondences.
    Hancock S; Morgan-Smith R; Buckleton J
    Sci Justice; 2012 Dec; 52(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 23068775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Rapid and Efficient Method for Evaluation of Suspect Testimony: Palynological Scanning.
    Wiltshire PE; Hawksworth DL; Edwards KJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1441-50. PubMed ID: 26212473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.