111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26654133)
1. Factors influencing the stiffness of fibroadenomas at shear wave elastography.
Elseedawy M; Whelehan P; Vinnicombe S; Thomson K; Evans A
Clin Radiol; 2016 Jan; 71(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 26654133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions: factors associated with false negative and false positive results.
Park SY; Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES
Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3788-3798. PubMed ID: 28168373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shear Wave Elastography (SWE): An Analysis of Breast Lesion Characterization in 83 Breast Lesions.
Feldmann A; Langlois C; Dewailly M; Martinez EF; Boulanger L; Kerdraon O; Faye N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2594-604. PubMed ID: 26159068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes in the elasticity of fibroadenoma during the menstrual cycle determined by real-time sonoelastography.
Kılıç F; Kayadibi Y; Kocael P; Velidedeoglu M; Bas A; Bakan S; Aydogan F; Karatas A; Yılmaz MH
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 84(6):1044-8. PubMed ID: 25814397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of shear-wave elastography to distinguish complex and complicated fibroadenomas from simple fibroadenomas.
Başara Akın I; Özgül H; Altay C; Seçil M; Durak MG; Gürel D; Balcı P
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2023 Sep; 29(5):674-681. PubMed ID: 36994883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shear-wave elastography and greyscale assessment of palpable probably benign masses: is biopsy always required?
Giannotti E; Vinnicombe S; Thomson K; McLean D; Purdie C; Jordan L; Evans A
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150865. PubMed ID: 27007593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative Maximum Shear-Wave Stiffness of Breast Masses as a Predictor of Histopathologic Severity.
Berg WA; Mendelson EB; Cosgrove DO; Doré CJ; Gay J; Henry JP; Cohen-Bacrie C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):448-55. PubMed ID: 26204299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions.
Shi XQ; Li JL; Wan WB; Huang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):960-6. PubMed ID: 25701532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stiffness at shear-wave elastography and patient presentation predicts upgrade at surgery following an ultrasound-guided core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Evans A; Purdie CA; Jordan L; Macaskill EJ; Flynn J; Vinnicombe S
Clin Radiol; 2016 Nov; 71(11):1156-9. PubMed ID: 27499466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Chang JM; Won JK; Lee KB; Park IA; Yi A; Moon WK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W347-56. PubMed ID: 23883252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting prognostic factors of breast cancer using shear wave elastography.
Choi WJ; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Kim H; Chae EY; Hong MJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 24268451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of shear-wave elastography in the diagnosis of symptomatic invasive lobular breast cancer.
Sim YT; Vinnicombe S; Whelehan P; Thomson K; Evans A
Clin Radiol; 2015 Jun; 70(6):604-9. PubMed ID: 25770021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New diagnostic criteria in real-time elastography for the assessment of breast lesions.
Adamietz BR; Meier-Meitinger M; Fasching P; Beckmann M; Hartmann A; Uder M; Häberle L; Schulz-Wendtland R; Schwab SA
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Feb; 32(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 21165816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shear-wave elastography in the diagnosis of solid breast masses: what leads to false-negative or false-positive results?
Yoon JH; Jung HK; Lee JT; Ko KH
Eur Radiol; 2013 Sep; 23(9):2432-40. PubMed ID: 23673572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. False positive or negative results of shear-wave elastography in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses: analysis of clinical and ultrasonographic characteristics.
Kim MY; Choi N; Yang JH; Yoo YB; Park KS
Acta Radiol; 2015 Oct; 56(10):1155-62. PubMed ID: 25277386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, combined with B-mode ultrasonography: qualitative and quantitative assessments.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim H; Park YJ; Kim JA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):2336-44. PubMed ID: 25130444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging.
Lee SH; Chang JM; Kim WH; Bae MS; Seo M; Koo HR; Chu AJ; Gweon HM; Cho N; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Oct; 273(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 24955927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of technical factors on sonoelastographic assessment of solid breast nodules.
Ciurea AI; Bolboaca SD; Ciortea CA; Botar-Jid C; Dudea SM
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S27-34. PubMed ID: 20938896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of peritumoral stromal tissue stiffness obtained by shear wave elastography between benign and malignant breast lesions.
Park HS; Shin HJ; Shin KC; Cha JH; Chae EY; Choi WJ; Kim HH
Acta Radiol; 2018 Oct; 59(10):1168-1175. PubMed ID: 29359949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Qualitative pattern classification of shear wave elastography for breast masses: how it correlates to quantitative measurements.
Yoon JH; Ko KH; Jung HK; Lee JT
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2199-204. PubMed ID: 24041435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
