These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26654230)
1. Construction of relatedness matrices using genotyping-by-sequencing data. Dodds KG; McEwan JC; Brauning R; Anderson RM; van Stijn TC; Kristjánsson T; Clarke SM BMC Genomics; 2015 Dec; 16():1047. PubMed ID: 26654230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low-depth genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in a bovine population: strategies to maximize the selection of high quality genotypes and the accuracy of imputation. Brouard JS; Boyle B; Ibeagha-Awemu EM; Bissonnette N BMC Genet; 2017 Apr; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 28381212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Construction of relatedness matrices in autopolyploid populations using low-depth high-throughput sequencing data. Bilton TP; Sharma SK; Schofield MR; Black MA; Jacobs JME; Bryan GJ; Dodds KG Theor Appl Genet; 2024 Mar; 137(3):64. PubMed ID: 38430392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genome-Wide SNP Calling from Genotyping by Sequencing (GBS) Data: A Comparison of Seven Pipelines and Two Sequencing Technologies. Torkamaneh D; Laroche J; Belzile F PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161333. PubMed ID: 27547936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of whole-genome (13X) and capture (87X) resequencing methods for SNP and genotype callings. Roux PF; Marthey S; Djari A; Moroldo M; Esquerré D; Estellé J; Klopp C; Lagarrigue S; Demeure O Anim Genet; 2015 Feb; 46(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 25515399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SNP discovery and genotyping using Genotyping-by-Sequencing in Pekin ducks. Zhu F; Cui QQ; Hou ZC Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():36223. PubMed ID: 27845353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of genotyping-by-sequencing analysis methods on low-coverage crop datasets shows advantages of a new workflow, GB-eaSy. Wickland DP; Battu G; Hudson KA; Diers BW; Hudson ME BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):586. PubMed ID: 29281959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fast-GBS: a new pipeline for the efficient and highly accurate calling of SNPs from genotyping-by-sequencing data. Torkamaneh D; Laroche J; Bastien M; Abed A; Belzile F BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):5. PubMed ID: 28049422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scanning and Filling: Ultra-Dense SNP Genotyping Combining Genotyping-By-Sequencing, SNP Array and Whole-Genome Resequencing Data. Torkamaneh D; Belzile F PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131533. PubMed ID: 26161900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. GBS-SNP-CROP: a reference-optional pipeline for SNP discovery and plant germplasm characterization using variable length, paired-end genotyping-by-sequencing data. Melo AT; Bartaula R; Hale I BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17():29. PubMed ID: 26754002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genotyping by Sequencing (GBS) for Genome-Wide SNP Identification in Plants. Pootakham W Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2638():1-8. PubMed ID: 36781631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variant calling and genotyping accuracy of ddRAD-seq: Comparison with 20X WGS in layers. Doublet M; Degalez F; Lagarrigue S; Lagoutte L; Gueret E; Allais S; Lecerf F PLoS One; 2024; 19(7):e0298565. PubMed ID: 39058708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simple SNP-based minimal marker genotyping for Humulus lupulus L. identification and variety validation. Henning JA; Coggins J; Peterson M BMC Res Notes; 2015 Oct; 8():542. PubMed ID: 26438052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. RAD-sequencing for estimating genomic relatedness matrix-based heritability in the wild: A case study in roe deer. Gervais L; Perrier C; Bernard M; Merlet J; Pemberton JM; Pujol B; Quéméré E Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Sep; 19(5):1205-1217. PubMed ID: 31058463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Parentage and relatedness reconstruction in Pinus sylvestris using genotyping-by-sequencing. Hall D; Zhao W; Wennström U; Andersson Gull B; Wang XR Heredity (Edinb); 2020 May; 124(5):633-646. PubMed ID: 32123330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An improved genotyping by sequencing (GBS) approach offering increased versatility and efficiency of SNP discovery and genotyping. Sonah H; Bastien M; Iquira E; Tardivel A; Légaré G; Boyle B; Normandeau É; Laroche J; Larose S; Jean M; Belzile F PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54603. PubMed ID: 23372741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential of genotyping-by-sequencing for genomic selection in livestock populations. Gorjanc G; Cleveland MA; Houston RD; Hickey JM Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):12. PubMed ID: 25887531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrating targeted genetic markers to genotyping-by-sequencing for an ultimate genotyping tool. de Ronne M; Abed A; Légaré G; Laroche J; Boucher St-Amour VT; Fortier É; Beattie A; Badea A; Khanal R; O'Donoughue L; Rajcan I; Belzile F; Boyle B; Torkamaneh D Theor Appl Genet; 2024 Oct; 137(10):247. PubMed ID: 39365439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using Mendelian inheritance to improve high-throughput SNP discovery. Chen N; Van Hout CV; Gottipati S; Clark AG Genetics; 2014 Nov; 198(3):847-57. PubMed ID: 25194160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Expected Genotype Quality and Diploidized Marker Data from Genotyping-by-Sequencing of Urochloa spp. Tetraploids. Matias FI; Xavier Meireles KG; Nagamatsu ST; Lima Barrios SC; Borges do Valle C; Carazzolle MF; Fritsche-Neto R; Endelman JB Plant Genome; 2019 Nov; 12(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 33016594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]