These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26655351)

  • 1. Costs of Learning and the Evolution of Mimetic Signals.
    Kikuchi DW; Sherratt TN
    Am Nat; 2015 Sep; 186(3):321-32. PubMed ID: 26655351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mimicry among Unequally Defended Prey Should Be Mutualistic When Predators Sample Optimally.
    Aubier TG; Joron M; Sherratt TN
    Am Nat; 2017 Mar; 189(3):267-282. PubMed ID: 28221836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The optimal sampling strategy for unfamiliar prey.
    Sherratt TN
    Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):2014-25. PubMed ID: 21729056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. State-Dependent Decision-Making by Predators and Its Consequences for Mimicry.
    Aubier TG; Sherratt TN
    Am Nat; 2020 Nov; 196(5):E127-E144. PubMed ID: 33064589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diversity in Müllerian mimicry: The optimal predator sampling strategy explains both local and regional polymorphism in prey.
    Aubier TG; Sherratt TN
    Evolution; 2015 Nov; 69(11):2831-45. PubMed ID: 26456598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolutionary implications of the form of predator generalization for aposematic signals and mimicry in prey.
    Ruxton GD; Franks DW; Balogh AC; Leimar O
    Evolution; 2008 Nov; 62(11):2913-21. PubMed ID: 18752602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating Müllerian mimicry: predator learning and variation in prey defences.
    Ihalainen E; Lindström L; Mappes J
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Mar; 20(2):780-91. PubMed ID: 17305843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reciprocal mimicry: kin selection can drive defended prey to resemble their Batesian mimics.
    Holen ØH; Johnstone RA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Oct; 285(1890):. PubMed ID: 30381376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights.
    Puurtinen M; Kaitala V
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2246-56. PubMed ID: 17236418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evolution of müllerian mimicry in multispecies communities.
    Beatty CD; Beirinckx K; Sherratt TN
    Nature; 2004 Sep; 431(7004):63-6. PubMed ID: 15343332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The evolution of warning signals as reliable indicators of prey defense.
    Sherratt TN; Beatty CD
    Am Nat; 2003 Oct; 162(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 14582002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prey community structure affects how predators select for Mullerian mimicry.
    Ihalainen E; Rowland HM; Speed MP; Ruxton GD; Mappes J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Jun; 279(1736):2099-105. PubMed ID: 22237908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The perfection of mimicry: an information approach.
    Sherratt TN; Peet-Paré CA
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2017 Jul; 372(1724):. PubMed ID: 28533457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Impact of Detoxification Costs and Predation Risk on Foraging: Implications for Mimicry Dynamics.
    Halpin CG; Skelhorn J; Rowe C; Ruxton GD; Higginson AD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169043. PubMed ID: 28045959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selection for evasive mimicry imposed by an arthropod predator.
    Loeffler-Henry K; Sherratt TN
    Biol Lett; 2024 Jan; 20(1):20230461. PubMed ID: 38166416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Warning signals evolve to disengage Batesian mimics.
    Franks DW; Ruxton GD; Sherratt TN
    Evolution; 2009 Jan; 63(1):256-67. PubMed ID: 18786193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evasive mimicry: when (if ever) could mimicry based on difficulty of capture evolve?
    Ruxton GD; Speed M; Sherratt TN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Oct; 271(1553):2135-42. PubMed ID: 15475333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Co-mimics have a mutualistic relationship despite unequal defences.
    Rowland HM; Ihalainen E; Lindström L; Mappes J; Speed MP
    Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7149):64-7. PubMed ID: 17611539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Natural selection on unpalatable species imposed by state-dependent foraging behaviour.
    Sherratt TN; Speed MP; Ruxton GD
    J Theor Biol; 2004 May; 228(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 15094016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variation in cyanogenic compounds concentration within a Heliconius butterfly community: does mimicry explain everything?
    Arias M; Meichanetzoglou A; Elias M; Rosser N; de-Silva DL; Nay B; Llaurens V
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Dec; 16(1):272. PubMed ID: 27978820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.