These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26655417)

  • 1. [Correlation between sagittal photogrammetric measurements of the soft tissue profile and dental arches measurements].
    Diouf JS; Touré B; Ndiaye M; Badiane A; Diop-Bâ K; Ngom PI; Diagne F
    Orthod Fr; 2015 Dec; 86(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 26655417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Sagittal photogrammetric evaluation of the soft tissue profile between two different racial groups: a comparative study].
    Diouf JS; Ngom PI; Fadiga MS; Badiane A; Diop-Ba K; Ndiaye M; Diagne F
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2015 Jun; 38(150):5-14. PubMed ID: 26934767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vertical photogrammetric evaluation of the soft tissue profiles of two different racial groups: a comparative study.
    Diouf JS; Ngom PI; Fadiga MS; Badiane A; Diop-Ba K; Ndiaye M; Diagne F
    Int Orthod; 2014 Dec; 12(4):443-57. PubMed ID: 25457394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Anatolian Turkish adults.
    Kale-Varlk S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1481-6. PubMed ID: 19098536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.
    Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facial photogrammetric profile measurements and sagittal dental occlusion in the young Congolese Bantu Adult (DRC).
    Esabish PL; Beugre-Kouassi LMA; Baukaka FS; Nzanza RM; Gboro TD; Beugre JB
    Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):342-353. PubMed ID: 31053446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch?
    El Haje OA; Pompeo DD; Furtado GC; Rivera LM; Paranhos LR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 25825099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Relationships between the dental arches measurements and the peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF): a cross sectional study on 78 Senegalese teenagers].
    Diouf JS; Badiane A; Ngom PI; Diop-Bâ K; Diagne F; Ndiaye PI
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2013 Dec; 36(144):5-14. PubMed ID: 24624639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Soft and hard tissue profile changes after rapid maxillary expansion and face mask therapy.
    Kurt G; Uysal T; Yagci A
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e10-8. PubMed ID: 21490978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile.
    Fernández-Riveiro P; Smyth-Chamosa E; Suárez-Quintanilla D; Suárez-Cunqueiro M
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Aug; 25(4):393-9. PubMed ID: 12938846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft-tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with mandibular setback osteotomy.
    Gjørup H; Athanasiou AE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):312-23. PubMed ID: 1927981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Soft tissue response and facial symmetry after orthognathic surgery.
    Wermker K; Kleinheinz J; Jung S; Dirksen D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):e339-45. PubMed ID: 24529350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue profile in 12-year-old southern Chinese.
    Leung CS; Yang Y; Wong RW; Hägg U; Lo J; McGrath C
    Head Face Med; 2014 Dec; 10():56. PubMed ID: 25540054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years.
    Bergman RT; Waschak J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Murphy NC
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23834271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lip posture following debonding of labial appliances based on conventional profile photographs.
    Abed Y; Har-Zion G; Redlich M
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 19216600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Facial soft tissue changes following maxillomandibular advancement for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.
    Conley RS; Boyd SB
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 65(7):1332-40. PubMed ID: 17577498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft-tissue facial profile of Indian adults.
    Pandian KS; Krishnan S; Kumar SA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 29652003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison study of different facial soft tissue analysis methods.
    Kook MS; Jung S; Park HJ; Oh HK; Ryu SY; Cho JH; Lee JS; Yoon SJ; Kim MS; Shin HK
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 24954528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.