470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26655643)
1. Crossmodal Correspondence Between Auditory Pitch and Visual Elevation Affects Temporal Ventriloquism.
Orchard-Mills E; Van der Burg E; Alais D
Perception; 2016 Apr; 45(4):409-24. PubMed ID: 26655643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pitch-elevation and pitch-size cross-modal correspondences do not affect temporal ventriloquism.
Uno K; Yokosawa K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Apr; 84(3):1052-1063. PubMed ID: 35217979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory influences on visual temporal rate perception.
Recanzone GH
J Neurophysiol; 2003 Feb; 89(2):1078-93. PubMed ID: 12574482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neural basis of the crossmodal correspondence between auditory pitch and visuospatial elevation.
McCormick K; Lacey S; Stilla R; Nygaard LC; Sathian K
Neuropsychologia; 2018 Apr; 112():19-30. PubMed ID: 29501792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Synesthetic congruency modulates the temporal ventriloquism effect.
Parise C; Spence C
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Sep; 442(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 18638522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are crossmodal correspondences relative or absolute? Sequential effects on speeded classification.
Brunetti R; Indraccolo A; Del Gatto C; Spence C; Santangelo V
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):527-534. PubMed ID: 29116614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory and visual distractors disrupt multisensory temporal acuity in the crossmodal temporal order judgment task.
Dean CL; Eggleston BA; Gibney KD; Aligbe E; Blackwell M; Kwakye LD
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179564. PubMed ID: 28723907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Crossmodal synesthetic congruency improves visual timing in dyslexic children.
Chen L; Zhang M; Ai F; Xie W; Meng X
Res Dev Disabil; 2016 Aug; 55():14-26. PubMed ID: 27022720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporal ventriloquism: crossmodal interaction on the time dimension. 1. Evidence from auditory-visual temporal order judgment.
Bertelson P; Aschersleben G
Int J Psychophysiol; 2003 Oct; 50(1-2):147-55. PubMed ID: 14511842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does cross-modal correspondence modulate modality-specific perceptual processing? Study using timing judgment tasks.
Uno K; Yokosawa K
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jan; 86(1):273-284. PubMed ID: 37932495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utilizing the ventriloquism-effect to investigate audio-visual binding.
Bischoff M; Walter B; Blecker CR; Morgen K; Vaitl D; Sammer G
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):578-86. PubMed ID: 16620884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Audio-visual crossmodal correspondences in domestic dogs (
Korzeniowska AT; Root-Gutteridge H; Simner J; Reby D
Biol Lett; 2019 Nov; 15(11):20190564. PubMed ID: 31718513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changing pitch of sounds alters perceived visual motion trajectory.
Takeshima Y; Gyoba J
Multisens Res; 2013; 26(4):317-32. PubMed ID: 24319926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Change of temporal-order judgment of sounds during long-lasting exposure to large-field visual motion.
Teramoto W; Watanabe H; Umemura H
Perception; 2008; 37(11):1649-66. PubMed ID: 19189730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal ventriloquism: crossmodal interaction on the time dimension. 2. Evidence from sensorimotor synchronization.
Aschersleben G; Bertelson P
Int J Psychophysiol; 2003 Oct; 50(1-2):157-63. PubMed ID: 14511843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Audio-Visual, Visuo-Tactile and Audio-Tactile Correspondences in Preschoolers.
Nava E; Grassi M; Turati C
Multisens Res; 2016; 29(1-3):93-111. PubMed ID: 27311292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Crossmodal interactions and multisensory integration in the perception of audio-visual motion -- a free-field study.
Schmiedchen K; Freigang C; Nitsche I; Rübsamen R
Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 1466():99-111. PubMed ID: 22617375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interactions Between Auditory Elevation, Auditory Pitch and Visual Elevation During Multisensory Perception.
Jamal Y; Lacey S; Nygaard L; Sathian K
Multisens Res; 2017 Jan; 30(3-5):287-306. PubMed ID: 31287081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of synesthetic associations between the visual and auditory modalities on the Colavita effect.
Stekelenburg JJ; Keetels M
Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1209-19. PubMed ID: 26126803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Opposite Distortions in Interval Timing Perception for Visual and Auditory Stimuli with Temporal Modulations.
Yuasa K; Yotsumoto Y
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135646. PubMed ID: 26292285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
