BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26655786)

  • 1. Potentiation of the startle reflex is in line with contingency reversal instructions rather than the conditioning history.
    Mertens G; De Houwer J
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Jan; 113():91-9. PubMed ID: 26655786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fear expression and return of fear following threat instruction with or without direct contingency experience.
    Mertens G; Kuhn M; Raes AK; Kalisch R; De Houwer J; Lonsdorf TB
    Cogn Emot; 2016 Aug; 30(5):968-84. PubMed ID: 25966279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Instructed extinction differentially affects the emotional and cognitive expression of associative fear memory.
    Sevenster D; Beckers T; Kindt M
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Oct; 49(10):1426-35. PubMed ID: 22958209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multimodal assessment of long-term memory recall and reinstatement in a combined cue and context fear conditioning and extinction paradigm in humans.
    Haaker J; Lonsdorf TB; Thanellou A; Kalisch R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e76179. PubMed ID: 24116095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fear conditioning with film clips: a complex associative learning paradigm.
    Kunze AE; Arntz A; Kindt M
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2015 Jun; 47():42-50. PubMed ID: 25481400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring the conditioned response: A comparison of pupillometry, skin conductance, and startle electromyography.
    Leuchs L; Schneider M; Spoormaker VI
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Jan; 56(1):e13283. PubMed ID: 30259985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of acoustic startle probes on fear learning in humans.
    de Haan MIC; van Well S; Visser RM; Scholte HS; van Wingen GA; Kindt M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):14552. PubMed ID: 30267018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fear conditioning following unilateral temporal lobectomy: dissociation of conditioned startle potentiation and autonomic learning.
    Weike AI; Hamm AO; Schupp HT; Runge U; Schroeder HW; Kessler C
    J Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 25(48):11117-24. PubMed ID: 16319311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does US expectancy mediate the additive effects of CS-US pairings on contingency instructions? Results from subjective, psychophysiological and neural measures.
    Mertens G; Braem S; Kuhn M; Lonsdorf TB; van den Hout MA; Engelhard IM
    Behav Res Ther; 2018 Nov; 110():41-46. PubMed ID: 30223152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural substrates of individual differences in human fear learning: evidence from concurrent fMRI, fear-potentiated startle, and US-expectancy data.
    van Well S; Visser RM; Scholte HS; Kindt M
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2012 Sep; 12(3):499-512. PubMed ID: 22451349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating the impact of sex and cortisol on implicit fear conditioning with fMRI.
    Merz CJ; Tabbert K; Schweckendiek J; Klucken T; Vaitl D; Stark R; Wolf OT
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2010 Jan; 35(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 19683399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noradrenergic enhancement of associative fear memory in humans.
    Soeter M; Kindt M
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2011 Sep; 96(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 21624479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fear acquisition requires awareness in trace but not delay conditioning.
    Weike AI; Schupp HT; Hamm AO
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Jan; 44(1):170-80. PubMed ID: 17241153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A potential pathway to the relapse of fear? Conditioned negative stimulus evaluation (but not physiological responding) resists instructed extinction.
    Luck CC; Lipp OV
    Behav Res Ther; 2015 Mar; 66():18-31. PubMed ID: 25658973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mixed evidence for the potential of non-invasive transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation to improve the extinction and retention of fear.
    Burger AM; Verkuil B; Fenlon H; Thijs L; Cools L; Miller HC; Vervliet B; Van Diest I
    Behav Res Ther; 2017 Oct; 97():64-74. PubMed ID: 28719827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fear-potentiated startle processing in humans: Parallel fMRI and orbicularis EMG assessment during cue conditioning and extinction.
    Lindner K; Neubert J; Pfannmöller J; Lotze M; Hamm AO; Wendt J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Dec; 98(3 Pt 2):535-45. PubMed ID: 25725377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fearing shades of grey: individual differences in fear responding towards generalisation stimuli.
    Arnaudova I; Krypotos AM; Effting M; Kindt M; Beckers T
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Sep; 31(6):1181-1196. PubMed ID: 27405100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of a context switch and context instructions on the return of verbally conditioned fear.
    Mertens G; De Houwer J
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2016 Jun; 51():10-8. PubMed ID: 26623519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Manipulating expectancy violations to strengthen the efficacy of human fear extinction.
    Stemerding LE; van Ast VA; Kindt M
    Behav Res Ther; 2023 Jun; 165():104319. PubMed ID: 37087796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissociation of neural responses and skin conductance reactions during fear conditioning with and without awareness of stimulus contingencies.
    Tabbert K; Stark R; Kirsch P; Vaitl D
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):761-70. PubMed ID: 16651009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.