BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26655922)

  • 1. Impact of Risk Adjustment for Socioeconomic Status on Risk-adjusted Surgical Readmission Rates.
    Glance LG; Kellermann AL; Osler TM; Li Y; Li W; Dick AW
    Ann Surg; 2016 Apr; 263(4):698-704. PubMed ID: 26655922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Including socioeconomic status reduces readmission penalties to safety-net hospitals.
    Gonzalez AA; Motaganahalli A; Saunders J; Dev S; Dev S; Ghaferi AA
    J Vasc Surg; 2024 Mar; 79(3):685-693.e1. PubMed ID: 37995891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Risk-Standardized Readmission Rates of Surgical Patients at Safety-Net and Non-Safety-Net Hospitals Using Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and American Hospital Association Data.
    Talutis SD; Chen Q; Wang N; Rosen AK
    JAMA Surg; 2019 May; 154(5):391-400. PubMed ID: 30649141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vulnerable Hospitals and Cancer Surgery Readmissions: Insights into the Unintended Consequences of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
    Hong Y; Zheng C; Hechenbleikner E; Johnson LB; Shara N; Al-Refaie WB
    J Am Coll Surg; 2016 Jul; 223(1):142-51. PubMed ID: 27261414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond classic risk adjustment: Socioeconomic status and hospital performance in urologic oncology surgery.
    Odisho AY; Etzioni R; Gore JL
    Cancer; 2018 Aug; 124(16):3372-3380. PubMed ID: 29905929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increased 30-day readmission rate after craniotomy for tumor resection at safety net hospitals in small metropolitan areas.
    Nathan NH; Connor M; Sizdahkhani S; Ding L; Mack WJ; Attenello FJ
    J Neurooncol; 2020 May; 148(1):141-154. PubMed ID: 32346836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medicare Shared Savings Program and readmission rate among patients with ischemic stroke.
    Kim Y; Glance LG; Holloway RG; Li Y
    Neurology; 2020 Aug; 95(8):e1071-e1079. PubMed ID: 32554774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of the American Community Survey Estimates of Risk-Adjusted Readmission Rankings for Hospitals Before and After Peer Group Stratification.
    Bell N; Lòpez-De Fede A; Cai B; Brooks JM
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Oct; 2(10):e1912727. PubMed ID: 31596488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Opinions on the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program: results of a national survey of hospital leaders.
    Joynt KE; Figueroa JE; Oray J; Jha AK
    Am J Manag Care; 2016 Aug; 22(8):e287-94. PubMed ID: 27556831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adjusting for social risk factors impacts performance and penalties in the hospital readmissions reduction program.
    Joynt Maddox KE; Reidhead M; Hu J; Kind AJH; Zaslavsky AM; Nagasako EM; Nerenz DR
    Health Serv Res; 2019 Apr; 54(2):327-336. PubMed ID: 30848491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact on hospital ranking of basing readmission measures on a composite endpoint of death or readmission versus readmissions alone.
    Glance LG; Li Y; Dick AW
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 May; 17(1):327. PubMed ID: 28476128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contributors to disparities in postpartum readmission rates between safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals: A decomposition analysis.
    Reid LD; Weiss AJ; Fingar KR
    J Hosp Med; 2022 Feb; 17(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 35504571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Readmissions performance and penalty experience of safety-net hospitals under Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.
    Banerjee S; Paasche-Orlow MK; McCormick D; Lin MY; Hanchate AD
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Mar; 22(1):338. PubMed ID: 35287693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association of the New Peer Group-Stratified Method With the Reclassification of Penalty Status in the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program.
    McCarthy CP; Vaduganathan M; Patel KV; Lalani HS; Ayers C; Bhatt DL; Januzzi JL; de Lemos JA; Yancy C; Fonarow GC; Pandey A
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Apr; 2(4):e192987. PubMed ID: 31026033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of socioeconomic status measures on hospital profiling in New York City.
    Blum AB; Egorova NN; Sosunov EA; Gelijns AC; DuPree E; Moskowitz AJ; Federman AD; Ascheim DD; Keyhani S
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2014 May; 7(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 24823956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety-net Hospitals Face More Barriers Yet Use Fewer Strategies to Reduce Readmissions.
    Figueroa JF; Joynt KE; Zhou X; Orav EJ; Jha AK
    Med Care; 2017 Mar; 55(3):229-235. PubMed ID: 28060053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends in readmission rates for safety net hospitals and non-safety net hospitals in the era of the US Hospital Readmission Reduction Program: a retrospective time series analysis using Medicare administrative claims data from 2008 to 2015.
    Salerno AM; Horwitz LI; Kwon JY; Herrin J; Grady JN; Lin Z; Ross JS; Bernheim SM
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jul; 7(7):e016149. PubMed ID: 28710221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring Mortality Performance: How Did Safety-Net Hospitals Compare With Other Hospitals?
    Jiang HJ; Reiter KL; Wang J
    Med Care; 2016 Jul; 54(7):648-56. PubMed ID: 27299951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of Medicaid Expansion With Quality in Safety-Net Hospitals.
    Chatterjee P; Qi M; Werner RM
    JAMA Intern Med; 2021 May; 181(5):590-597. PubMed ID: 33587092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of socio-economic status on unplanned readmission following injury: A multicenter cohort study.
    Cisse B; Moore L; Kuimi BL; Porgo TV; Boutin A; Lavoie A; Bourgeois G
    Injury; 2016 May; 47(5):1083-90. PubMed ID: 26746984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.