These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26655978)

  • 1. The Evolution of Ovoviviparity in a Temporally Varying Environment.
    Mueller LD; Bitner K
    Am Nat; 2015 Dec; 186(6):708-15. PubMed ID: 26655978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Egg size, embryonic development time and ovoviviparity in Drosophila species.
    Markow TA; Beall S; Matzkin LM
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Feb; 22(2):430-4. PubMed ID: 19032497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal variation favors the evolution of generalists in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Condon C; Cooper BS; Yeaman S; Angilletta MJ
    Evolution; 2014 Mar; 68(3):720-8. PubMed ID: 24152128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do species converge during adaptation? A case study in Drosophila.
    Rego C; Rose MR; Matos M
    Physiol Biochem Zool; 2007; 80(4):347-57. PubMed ID: 17508331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Niche evolution and thermal adaptation in the temperate species Drosophila americana.
    Sillero N; Reis M; Vieira CP; Vieira J; Morales-Hojas R
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Aug; 27(8):1549-61. PubMed ID: 24835376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolutionary optimality applied to Drosophila experiments: hypothesis of constrained reproductive efficiency.
    Novoseltsev VN; Arking R; Novoseltseva JA; Yashin AI
    Evolution; 2002 Jun; 56(6):1136-49. PubMed ID: 12144015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A model of the evolution of larval feeding rate in Drosophila driven by conflicting energy demands.
    Mueller LD; Barter TT
    Genetica; 2015 Feb; 143(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 25630626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Convergence to a novel environment: comparative method versus experimental evolution.
    Matos M; Simões P; Duarte A; Rego C; Avelar T; Rose MR
    Evolution; 2004 Jul; 58(7):1503-10. PubMed ID: 15341152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diversification in temporally heterogeneous environments: effect of the grain in experimental bacterial populations.
    Venail PA; Kaltz O; Olivieri I; Pommier T; Mouquet N
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Nov; 24(11):2485-95. PubMed ID: 21899638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Natural genetic variation in social environment choice: context-dependent gene-environment correlation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Saltz JB
    Evolution; 2011 Aug; 65(8):2325-34. PubMed ID: 21790578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolution of Fitness Trade-Offs in Locally Adapted Populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens.
    Schick A; Bailey SF; Kassen R
    Am Nat; 2015 Oct; 186 Suppl 1():S48-59. PubMed ID: 26656216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolutionary domestication in Drosophila subobscura.
    Simões P; Rose MR; Duarte A; Gonçalves R; Matos M
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Mar; 20(2):758-66. PubMed ID: 17305841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolutionary genetics of reproductive behavior in Drosophila: connecting the dots.
    Markow TA; O'Grady PM
    Annu Rev Genet; 2005; 39():263-91. PubMed ID: 16285861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genotype by environment interactions in viability and developmental time in populations of cactophilic Drosophila.
    Fanara JJ; Folguera G; Iriarte PF; Mensch J; Hasson E
    J Evol Biol; 2006 May; 19(3):900-8. PubMed ID: 16674586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evolution of novel host use is unlikely to be constrained by trade-offs or a lack of genetic variation.
    Gompert Z; Jahner JP; Scholl CF; Wilson JS; Lucas LK; Soria-Carrasco V; Fordyce JA; Nice CC; Buerkle CA; Forister ML
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Jun; 24(11):2777-93. PubMed ID: 25877787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toy models for macroevolutionary patterns and trends.
    Alicea B; Gordon R
    Biosystems; 2014 Sep; 123():54-66. PubMed ID: 25224014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Generation time and fitness tradeoffs during the evolution of multicellularity.
    Leslie MP; Shelton DE; Michod RE
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Oct; 430():92-102. PubMed ID: 28709942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Asymmetric Evolvability Leads to Specialization without Trade-Offs.
    Draghi JA
    Am Nat; 2021 Jun; 197(6):644-657. PubMed ID: 33989145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Asymmetric mismatch in strain-specific genital morphology causes increased harm to Drosophila females.
    Masly JP; Kamimura Y
    Evolution; 2014 Aug; 68(8):2401-11. PubMed ID: 24758304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Growth trades off with habitat specialization.
    Caley MJ; Munday PL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Nov; 270 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S175-7. PubMed ID: 14667374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.