BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26656036)

  • 1. Patient-Rated Outcomes of Lumbar Fusion in Patients With Degenerative Disease of the Lumbar Spine: Does Age Matter?
    Marbacher S; Mannion AF; Burkhardt JK; Schär RT; Porchet F; Kleinstück F; Jeszenszky D; Fekete TF; Haschtmann D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 May; 41(10):893-900. PubMed ID: 26656036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Complications and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of one- or two-level degenerative disc diseases of the lumbar spine in patients older than 65 years.
    Wu WJ; Liang Y; Zhang XK; Cao P; Zheng T
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Jul; 125(14):2505-10. PubMed ID: 22882930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Operative and nonoperative treatment approaches for lumbar degenerative disc disease have similar long-term clinical outcomes among patients with positive discography.
    Smith JS; Sidhu G; Bode K; Gendelberg D; Maltenfort M; Ibrahimi D; Shaffrey CI; Vaccaro AR
    World Neurosurg; 2014 Nov; 82(5):872-8. PubMed ID: 24047821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic stabilization for degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients.
    Di Silvestre M; Lolli F; Bakaloudis G; Parisini P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 20081518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgical training in spine surgery: safety and patient-rated outcome.
    Waisbrod G; Mannion AF; Fekete TF; Kleinstueck F; Jeszenszky D; Haschtmann D
    Eur Spine J; 2019 Apr; 28(4):807-816. PubMed ID: 30694391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What level of pain are patients happy to live with after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders?
    Fekete TF; Haschtmann D; Kleinstück FS; Porchet F; Jeszenszky D; Mannion AF
    Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4 Suppl):S12-8. PubMed ID: 26850172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative effectiveness study of patient-rated and radiographic outcome after 2 types of decompression with fusion for spondylotic myelopathy: anterior cervical discectomy versus corpectomy.
    Burkhardt JK; Mannion AF; Marbacher S; Dolp PA; Fekete TF; Jeszenszky D; Porchet F
    Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Jul; 35(1):E4. PubMed ID: 23815249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of clinical and radiological results of posterolateral fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine.
    Audat Z; Moutasem O; Yousef K; Mohammad B
    Singapore Med J; 2012 Mar; 53(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 22434292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional and radiological outcomes of 360 degrees fusion of three or more motion levels in the lumbar spine for degenerative disc disease.
    Suratwala SJ; Pinto MR; Gilbert TJ; Winter RB; Wroblewski JM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):E351-8. PubMed ID: 19404164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion for adult degenerative scoliosis with 1 or 2 dislocated levels.
    Flouzat-Lachaniette CH; Ratte L; Poignard A; Auregan JC; Queinnec S; Hernigou P; Allain J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Dec; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 26315959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term magnetic resonance imaging follow-up demonstrates minimal transitional level lumbar disc degeneration after posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Green DW; Lawhorne TW; Widmann RF; Kepler CK; Ahern C; Mintz DN; Rawlins BA; Burke SW; Boachie-Adjei O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1948-54. PubMed ID: 21289549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
    Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient-reported outcome scores underestimate the impact of major complications in patients undergoing spine surgery for degenerative conditions.
    Gvozdyev BV; Carreon LY; Graves CM; Riley SA; McGraw KE; Head RJ; Dimar JR; Glassman SD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 28753065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-level lumbar fusion for degenerative disc disease is associated with worse outcomes compared with fusion for spondylolisthesis in a workers' compensation setting.
    Anderson JT; Haas AR; Percy R; Woods ST; Ahn UM; Ahn NU
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Mar; 40(5):323-31. PubMed ID: 25494321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inpatient Outcomes and Postoperative Complications After Primary Versus Revision Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgeries for Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease: A National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample Analysis, 2002-2011.
    Kalakoti P; Missios S; Maiti T; Konar S; Bir S; Bollam P; Nanda A
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 85():114-24. PubMed ID: 26319189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of 2 lumbar total disc replacements: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter Food and Drug Administration trial with 24-month follow-up.
    Guyer RD; Pettine K; Roh JS; Dimmig TA; Coric D; McAfee PC; Ohnmeiss DD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(12):925-31. PubMed ID: 24718066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complications and Rates of Subsequent Lumbar Surgery Following Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty and Lumbar Fusion.
    Eliasberg CD; Kelly MP; Ajiboye RM; SooHoo NF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 26751061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
    Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.