These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26656190)

  • 1. Interleaved Processors Improve Cochlear Implant Patients' Spectral Resolution.
    Aronoff JM; Stelmach J; Padilla M; Landsberger DM
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e85-90. PubMed ID: 26656190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptually aligning apical frequency regions leads to more binaural fusion of speech in a cochlear implant simulation.
    Staisloff HE; Lee DH; Aronoff JM
    Hear Res; 2016 Jul; 337():59-64. PubMed ID: 27208791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users.
    Schatzer R; Koroleva I; Griessner A; Levin S; Kusovkov V; Yanov Y; Zierhofer C
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():99-106. PubMed ID: 25457654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing sound localization deficits in bilateral cochlear-implant users and vocoder simulations with normal-hearing listeners.
    Jones H; Kan A; Litovsky RY
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25385244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.
    Fu QJ; Nogaki G
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 6(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 15735937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between bilateral cochlear implants and Neurelec Digisonic(®) SP Binaural cochlear implant: speech perception, sound localization and patient self-assessment.
    Bonnard D; Lautissier S; Bosset-Audoit A; Coriat G; Beraha M; Maunoury A; Martel J; Darrouzet V; Bébéar JP; Dauman R
    Audiol Neurootol; 2013; 18(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 23548561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant.
    Dunn CC; Tyler RS; Witt SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):668-80. PubMed ID: 16197280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrasting benefits from contralateral implants and hearing aids in cochlear implant users.
    van Hoesel RJ
    Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 288(1-2):100-13. PubMed ID: 22226928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effect of rehabilitation for prelingual deaf children who use cochlear implants in conjunction with hearing aids in the opposite ears].
    Tian Y; Zhou H; Zhang J; Yang D; Xu Y; Guo Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 26(19):868-70, 873. PubMed ID: 23285948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Scheperle RA; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 25658746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefit of a contralateral routing of signal device for unilateral cochlear implant users.
    Weder S; Kompis M; Caversaccio M; Stieger C
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 25501444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fundamental frequency information for speech recognition via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other.
    Shpak T; Most T; Luntz M
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 24141594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Criteria for Selecting an Optimal Device for the Contralateral Ear of Children with a Unilateral Cochlear Implant.
    Jeong SW; Kang MY; Kim LS
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(5):314-21. PubMed ID: 26277845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study.
    Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Arcaroli J; Sammeth C
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):714-31. PubMed ID: 17086081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bilateral cochlear implants in long-term and short-term deafness.
    McNeill C; Noble W; Purdy SC; O'Brien A; Sharma M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Feb; 13(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 22340752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychophysical Map Stability in Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implantation: Comparing Current Audiology Methods to a New Statistical Definition.
    Domville-Lewis C; Santa Maria PL; Upson G; Chester-Browne R; Atlas MD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 25710778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear implant outcomes in adults and adolescents with early-onset hearing loss.
    Caposecco A; Hickson L; Pedley K
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):209-20. PubMed ID: 21934504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.
    Lenarz T; James C; Cuda D; Fitzgerald O'Connor A; Frachet B; Frijns JH; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Marx M; Merkus P; Mylanus EA; Offeciers E; Pesch J; Ramos-Macias A; Robier A; Sterkers O; Uziel A
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.