These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

714 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26656192)

  • 1. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency-dependent loudness balancing in bimodal cochlear implant users.
    Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; van Opstal AJ; Mens LH
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 136(8):775-81. PubMed ID: 26986743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of frequency compression by cochlear implant recipients with postoperative acoustic hearing.
    McDermott H; Henshall K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jun; 21(6):380-9. PubMed ID: 20701835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.
    Davidson LS; Firszt JB; Brenner C; Cadieux JH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25879243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of automatic gain control parameter settings on speech understanding of cochlear implant users employing the continuous interleaved sampling strategy.
    Stöbich B; Zierhofer CM; Hochmair ES
    Ear Hear; 1999 Apr; 20(2):104-16. PubMed ID: 10229512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of (Mis)Matched Compression Speed on Speech Recognition in Bimodal Listeners.
    Spirrov D; Kludt E; Verschueren E; Büchner A; Francart T
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520948974. PubMed ID: 32865486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user.
    Van Hoesel R; Ramsden R; Odriscoll M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Apr; 23(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 11951849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear implant combined with a linear frequency transposing hearing aid.
    Hua H; Johansson B; Jönsson R; Magnusson L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):722-32. PubMed ID: 23072964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Wilson BS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e138-48. PubMed ID: 26862711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mandarin Tone and Vowel Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Talker Variability and Bimodal Hearing.
    Chang YP; Chang RY; Lin CY; Luo X
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 26752089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.
    Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Benefit of Bimodal Hearing and Beamforming for Cochlear Implant Users.
    Langerak NC; Stronks HC; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Audiol Neurootol; 2024; 29(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 38447538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.
    Zaleski-King A; Goupell MJ; Barac-Cikoja D; Bakke M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Sep; 30(8):659-671. PubMed ID: 30417825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bimodal benefit depends on the performance difference between a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
    Yoon YS; Shin YR; Gho JS; Fu QJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 May; 16(3):159-67. PubMed ID: 25329752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Busby PA; Arora K
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 26671316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contralateral hearing aid use in cochlear implanted patients: multicenter study of bimodal benefit.
    Morera C; Cavalle L; Manrique M; Huarte A; Angel R; Osorio A; Garcia-Ibañez L; Estrada E; Morera-Ballester C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 132(10):1084-94. PubMed ID: 22667256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of extreme adaptive frequency compression in bimodal listeners on sound localization and speech perception.
    Veugen LCE; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; van Opstal AJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Sep; 18(5):266-277. PubMed ID: 28726592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.