162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26656501)
1. New Morbidity and Comorbidity Scores based on the Structure of the ICD-10.
Stausberg J; Hagn S
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143365. PubMed ID: 26656501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk adjustment performance of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in ICD-9 and ICD-10 administrative databases.
Li B; Evans D; Faris P; Dean S; Quan H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Jan; 8():12. PubMed ID: 18194561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Elderly Patients With Cervical Spine Fractures: A Comparison of the Charlson and Elixhauser Comorbidity Measures.
Menendez ME; Ring D; Harris MB; Cha TD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jun; 40(11):809-15. PubMed ID: 25785957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New ICD-10 version of the Multipurpose Australian Comorbidity Scoring System outperformed Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in an older population.
Toson B; Harvey LA; Close JC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Nov; 79():62-69. PubMed ID: 27101889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Elixhauser comorbidity method outperforms the Charlson index in predicting inpatient death after orthopaedic surgery.
Menendez ME; Neuhaus V; van Dijk CN; Ring D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Sep; 472(9):2878-86. PubMed ID: 24867450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stroke: the Elixhauser Index for comorbidity adjustment of in-hospital case fatality.
Zhu H; Hill MD
Neurology; 2008 Jul; 71(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 18645167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cross-national comparative performance of three versions of the ICD-10 Charlson index.
Sundararajan V; Quan H; Halfon P; Fushimi K; Luthi JC; Burnand B; Ghali WA;
Med Care; 2007 Dec; 45(12):1210-5. PubMed ID: 18007172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the Combined Comorbidity Index of Charlson and Elixhauser to Predict 30-Day Mortality Across ICD-9 and ICD-10.
Simard M; Sirois C; Candas B
Med Care; 2018 May; 56(5):441-447. PubMed ID: 29578951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data.
van Walraven C; Austin PC; Jennings A; Quan H; Forster AJ
Med Care; 2009 Jun; 47(6):626-33. PubMed ID: 19433995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Charlson scores based on ICD-10 administrative data were valid in assessing comorbidity in patients undergoing urological cancer surgery.
Nuttall M; van der Meulen J; Emberton M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 16488357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inpatient mortality after orthopaedic surgery.
Menendez ME; Neuhaus V; Ring D
Int Orthop; 2015 Jul; 39(7):1307-14. PubMed ID: 25711395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.
Quan H; Sundararajan V; Halfon P; Fong A; Burnand B; Luthi JC; Saunders LD; Beck CA; Feasby TE; Ghali WA
Med Care; 2005 Nov; 43(11):1130-9. PubMed ID: 16224307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Comparison of the Charlson and Elixhauser Comorbidity Measures to Predict Inpatient Mortality After Proximal Humerus Fracture.
Menendez ME; Ring D
J Orthop Trauma; 2015 Nov; 29(11):488-93. PubMed ID: 26165266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comorbidity scores for administrative data benefited from adaptation to local coding and diagnostic practices.
Bottle A; Aylin P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1426-33. PubMed ID: 21764557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices with different weightings to predict in-hospital mortality: an analysis of national inpatient data.
Sharma N; Schwendimann R; Endrich O; Ausserhofer D; Simon M
BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jan; 21(1):13. PubMed ID: 33407455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The new measuring multimorbidity index predicted mortality better than Charlson and Elixhauser indices among the general population.
Stanley J; Sarfati D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 92():99-110. PubMed ID: 28844785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data.
Southern DA; Quan H; Ghali WA
Med Care; 2004 Apr; 42(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 15076812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simple Excel and ICD-10 based dataset calculator for the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices.
Prommik P; Tootsi K; Saluse T; Strauss E; Kolk H; Märtson A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jan; 22(1):4. PubMed ID: 34996364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of comorbidity scores for control of confounding in studies using administrative databases.
Schneeweiss S; Maclure M
Int J Epidemiol; 2000 Oct; 29(5):891-8. PubMed ID: 11034974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of hospital morbidity data and the performance of comorbidity scores as predictors of mortality.
Mnatzaganian G; Ryan P; Norman PE; Hiller JE
J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jan; 65(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 21803545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
