These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26657188)

  • 1. [Propensity score: A credible alternative to randomization?].
    Filleron T; Kwiatowski F
    Bull Cancer; 2016 Jan; 103(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 26657188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Propensity Score Matching: Retrospective Randomization?
    Jupiter DC
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(2):417-420. PubMed ID: 28231973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generalized propensity score for estimating the average treatment effect of multiple treatments.
    Feng P; Zhou XH; Zou QM; Fan MY; Li XS
    Stat Med; 2012 Mar; 31(7):681-97. PubMed ID: 21351291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re: Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer treatments: evaluating statistical adjustments for confounding in observational data.
    Vickers AJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Jul; 103(14):1134; author reply 1134-5. PubMed ID: 21690487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
    Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Propensity scores used for analysis of cluster randomized trials with selection bias: a simulation study.
    Leyrat C; Caille A; Donner A; Giraudeau B
    Stat Med; 2013 Aug; 32(19):3357-72. PubMed ID: 23553813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining propensity score-based stratification and weighting to improve causal inference in the evaluation of health care interventions.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):1065-71. PubMed ID: 25266868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Propensity score: interest and limits].
    Kwiatkowski F; Slim K; Verrelle P; Chamorey E; Kramar A
    Bull Cancer; 2007 Jul; 94(7):680-6. PubMed ID: 17723950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrograde versus antegrade nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better for achieving early functional recovery?
    Ko YH; Coelho RF; Sivaraman A; Schatloff O; Chauhan S; Abdul-Muhsin HM; Carrion RJ; Palmer KJ; Cheon J; Patel VR
    Eur Urol; 2013 Jan; 63(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 23092543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Propensity score: Interests, use and limitations. A practical guide for clinicians].
    Moulis G; Lapeyre-Mestre M
    Rev Med Interne; 2018 Oct; 39(10):805-812. PubMed ID: 29514739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early salvage radiation therapy does not compromise cancer control in patients with pT3N0 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: results of a match-controlled multi-institutional analysis.
    Briganti A; Wiegel T; Joniau S; Cozzarini C; Bianchi M; Sun M; Tombal B; Haustermans K; Budiharto T; Hinkelbein W; Di Muzio N; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H
    Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):472-87. PubMed ID: 22633803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching.
    Baser O
    Value Health; 2006; 9(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 17076868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomization, matching, and propensity scores in the design and analysis of experimental studies with measured baseline covariates.
    Loux TM
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(4):558-70. PubMed ID: 25384851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bias reduction in repeated-measures observational studies by the use of propensity score: the case of enteral sedation for critically ill patients.
    Umbrello M; Mistraletti G; Corbella D; Cigada M; Salini S; Morabito A; Iapichino G
    J Crit Care; 2012 Dec; 27(6):662-72. PubMed ID: 22884533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.
    Modi N
    Neonatology; 2014; 105(4):350-1. PubMed ID: 24931328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Propensity score methods for estimating relative risks in cluster randomized trials with low-incidence binary outcomes and selection bias.
    Leyrat C; Caille A; Donner A; Giraudeau B
    Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(20):3556-75. PubMed ID: 24771662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Propensity Score Matching in Nonrandomized Studies: A Concept Simply Explained Using Antidepressant Treatment During Pregnancy as an Example.
    Andrade C
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2017 Feb; 78(2):e162-e165. PubMed ID: 28234438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating exposure effects by modelling the expectation of exposure conditional on confounders.
    Robins JM; Mark SD; Newey WK
    Biometrics; 1992 Jun; 48(2):479-95. PubMed ID: 1637973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introduction to propensity scores.
    Williamson EJ; Forbes A
    Respirology; 2014 Jul; 19(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 24889820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The multiple propensity score as control for bias in the comparison of more than two treatment arms: an introduction from a case study in mental health.
    Spreeuwenberg MD; Bartak A; Croon MA; Hagenaars JA; Busschbach JJ; Andrea H; Twisk J; Stijnen T
    Med Care; 2010 Feb; 48(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 20068488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.