These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26659136)

  • 21. Patient-focused rehabilitation team cohesiveness in veterans administration hospitals.
    Smits SJ; Falconer JA; Herrin J; Bowen SE; Strasser DC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Sep; 84(9):1332-8. PubMed ID: 13680570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rehabilitation treatment taxonomy: establishing common ground.
    Dijkers MP
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1 Suppl):S1-5.e2. PubMed ID: 24370320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Managing transitional work--program foundation.
    Strasser PB
    AAOHN J; 2004 Aug; 52(8):323-6. PubMed ID: 15357370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rehabilitation planning for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.
    Jeglinsky I; Salminen AL; Carlberg EB; Autti-Rämö I
    J Pediatr Rehabil Med; 2012; 5(3):203-15. PubMed ID: 23023253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A survey of goal-setting methods used in rehabilitation.
    Holliday RC; Antoun M; Playford ED
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2005 Sep; 19(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 16093413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Team models in neurorehabilitation: structure, function, and culture change.
    Karol RL
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2014; 34(4):655-69. PubMed ID: 24796442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Collaborative rehabilitation goal setting.
    McClain C
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2005; 12(4):56-60. PubMed ID: 16698737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The rehabilitation team: staff perceptions of the hospital environment, the interdisciplinary team environment, and interprofessional relations.
    Strasser DC; Falconer JA; Martino-Saltzmann D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Feb; 75(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 8311674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Concordance in goal setting between patients with multiple sclerosis and their rehabilitation team.
    Bloom LF; Lapierre NM; Wilson KG; Curran D; DeForge DA; Blackmer J
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 85(10):807-13. PubMed ID: 16998427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Is a rehabilitation treatment taxonomy the right answer to the rehabilitation black box?
    Cieza A; Bickenbach J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1 Suppl):S85-7. PubMed ID: 24370330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Goal setting in inpatient medical rehabilitation: exploring the current practice].
    Dudeck A; Glattacker M; Gustke M; Dibbelt S; Greitemann B; Jäckel WH
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2011 Oct; 50(5):316-30. PubMed ID: 21647855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Measuring acute rehabilitation needs in trauma: preliminary evaluation of the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale.
    Hoffman K; West A; Nott P; Cole E; Playford D; Liu C; Brohi K
    Injury; 2013 Jan; 44(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 22130452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Treatment taxonomy for rehabilitation: past, present, and prospects.
    Dijkers MP; Hart T; Tsaousides T; Whyte J; Zanca JM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1 Suppl):S6-16. PubMed ID: 24370326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Team approaches to treating children with disabilities: a comparison.
    Rosen C; Miller AC; Pit-ten Cate IM; Bicchieri S; Gordon RM; Daniele R
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Apr; 79(4):430-4. PubMed ID: 9552110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Rehabilitation treatment taxonomy: implications and continuations.
    P Dijkers M; Hart T; Whyte J; M Zanca J; Packel A; Tsaousides T
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1 Suppl):S45-54.e2. PubMed ID: 24370324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. ICF profiling of patients with traumatic brain injury: an international professional survey.
    Laxe S; Zasler N; Robles V; López-Blázquez R; Tormos JM; Bernabeu M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2014; 36(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 23596999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Training rehabilitation teams in sexual health care: A description and evaluation of a multidisciplinary intervention.
    Pieters R; Kedde H; Bender J
    Disabil Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 40(6):732-739. PubMed ID: 28068867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Toward a theory-driven classification of rehabilitation treatments.
    Hart T; Tsaousides T; Zanca JM; Whyte J; Packel A; Ferraro M; Dijkers MP
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1 Suppl):S33-44.e2. PubMed ID: 24370323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Classifying client goals in community-based ABI rehabilitation: a taxonomy for profiling service delivery and conceptualizing outcomes.
    Kuipers P; Foster M; Carlson G; Moy J
    Disabil Rehabil; 2003 Feb; 25(3):154-62. PubMed ID: 12648005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.