These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2666027)

  • 1. The likelihood ratio versus the p value in meta-analysis: where is the evidence? Comment on the paper by S. N. Goodman.
    Zucker D; Yusuf S
    Control Clin Trials; 1989 Jun; 10(2):205-8; discussion 209-10. PubMed ID: 2666027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis and evidence.
    Goodman SN
    Control Clin Trials; 1989 Jun; 10(2):188-204. PubMed ID: 2666026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Likelihood ratio meta-analysis: New motivation and approach for an old method.
    Dormuth CR; Filion KB; Platt RW
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2016 Mar; 47():259-65. PubMed ID: 26837056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Importance of trends in the interpretation of an overall odds ratio in the meta-analysis of clinical trials.
    Senn S
    Stat Med; 1994 Feb; 13(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 8202653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A finite mixture method for outlier detection and robustness in meta-analysis.
    Beath KJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 26052953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comment on: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified.
    Coory MD
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 39(3):932; author reply 933. PubMed ID: 19349478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methods for the joint meta-analysis of multiple tests.
    Trikalinos TA; Hoaglin DC; Small KM; Terrin N; Schmid CH
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):294-312. PubMed ID: 26052954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combining heterogenous studies using the random-effects model is a mistake and leads to inconclusive meta-analyses.
    Al Khalaf MM; Thalib L; Doi SA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 20409685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Importance of trends in the interpretation of an overall odds ratio in the meta-analysis of clinical trials.
    Brand R; Kragt H
    Stat Med; 1992 Dec; 11(16):2077-82. PubMed ID: 1293669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What have we learned from meta-analysis?
    Stockler M; Coates A
    Med J Aust; 1993 Sep; 159(5):291-3. PubMed ID: 8361419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A bivariate approach to meta-analysis.
    Van Houwelingen HC; Zwinderman KH; Stijnen T
    Stat Med; 1993 Dec; 12(24):2273-84. PubMed ID: 7907813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of one-step and two-step meta-analysis models using individual patient data.
    Mathew T; Nordström K
    Biom J; 2010 Apr; 52(2):271-87. PubMed ID: 20349448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of cluster randomization trials.
    Donner A; Piaggio G; Villar J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2001 Oct; 10(5):325-38. PubMed ID: 11697225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials.
    Donner A; Klar N
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(19):2971-80. PubMed ID: 12325113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The ABC's of medical statistics. Reading and understanding clinical trials].
    Labenz J; Kunz CU
    Internist (Berl); 2010 Apr; 51(4):489-99; quiz 500. PubMed ID: 20221576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Missing outcome data in meta-analysis.
    Mavridis D; Chaimani A; Efthimiou O; Salanti G
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2018 Aug; 21(3):123. PubMed ID: 25009176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Meta-analysis of clinical trials: uses and pitfalls].
    Boissel JP
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2007; 191(4-5):759-70. PubMed ID: 18225428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis by random effect modelling in generalized linear models.
    Aitkin M
    Stat Med; 1999 Sep 15-30; 18(17-18):2343-51. PubMed ID: 10474144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introduction to the special issue on the origins of modern meta-analysis.
    Shadish WR
    Res Synth Methods; 2015 Sep; 6(3):219-20. PubMed ID: 26097018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian robustness in meta-analysis for studies with zero responses.
    Vázquez FJ; Moreno E; Negrín MA; Martel M
    Pharm Stat; 2016 May; 15(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 26913715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.