These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26661136)

  • 1. Paying for Forest Ecosystem Services: Voluntary Versus Mandatory Payments.
    Roesch-McNally GE; Rabotyagov SS
    Environ Manage; 2016 Mar; 57(3):585-600. PubMed ID: 26661136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Value orientation and payment for ecosystem services: Perceived detrimental consequences lead to willingness-to-pay for ecosystem services.
    Obeng EA; Aguilar FX
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 206():458-471. PubMed ID: 29107802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Willingness of Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners to Enter California's Carbon Offset Market.
    Kelly EC; Gold GJ; Di Tommaso J
    Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 60(5):882-895. PubMed ID: 28836080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anticipating changes in wildlife habitat induced by private forest owners' adaptation to climate change and carbon policy.
    Hashida Y; Withey J; Lewis DJ; Newman T; Kline JD
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0230525. PubMed ID: 32240191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating carbon storage, timber harvest, and habitat possibilities for a Western Cascades (USA) forest landscape.
    Kline JD; Harmon ME; Spies TA; Morzillo AT; Pabst RJ; McComb BC; Schnekenburger F; Olsen KA; Csuti B; Vogeler JC
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Oct; 26(7):2044-2059. PubMed ID: 27755743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analysis of landowner participation in voluntary incentive programs for provision of forest ecosystem services.
    Mitani Y; Lindhjem H
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Feb; 36(1):e13729. PubMed ID: 33786879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Households' preferences for hydrological services in Veracruz, Mexico: The importance of outcomes vs. program design.
    McGinnis I; Atallah SS; Huang JC
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Dec; 300():113763. PubMed ID: 34649329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Designing a carbon market that protects forests in developing countries.
    Niesten E; Frumhoff PC; Manion M; Hardner JJ
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1875-88. PubMed ID: 12460503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The valuation of forest ecosystem services as a tool for management planning - A choice experiment.
    Müller A; Olschewski R; Unterberger C; Knoke T
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Oct; 271():111008. PubMed ID: 32778292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of economic forest ecosystem services in China].
    Wang B; Lu SW
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2009 Feb; 20(2):417-25. PubMed ID: 19459385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-use Economic Values for Little-Known Aquatic Species at Risk: Comparing Choice Experiment Results from Surveys Focused on Species, Guilds, and Ecosystems.
    Rudd MA; Andres S; Kilfoil M
    Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 58(3):476-90. PubMed ID: 27294723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Willingness to Pay for Conservation of Transborder Migratory Species: A Case Study of the Mexican Free-Tailed Bat in the United States and Mexico.
    Haefele MA; Loomis JB; Merideth R; Lien A; Semmens DJ; Dubovsky J; Wiederholt R; Thogmartin WE; Huang TK; McCracken G; Medellin RA; Diffendorfer JE; López-Hoffman L
    Environ Manage; 2018 Aug; 62(2):229-240. PubMed ID: 29732478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of biological monitoring and results outreach on private landowner conservation management.
    Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Heggenstaller E; Larkin JL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194740. PubMed ID: 29617388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Economic Value of the Greater Montreal Blue Network (Quebec, Canada): A Contingent Choice Study Using Real Projects to Estimate Non-Market Aquatic Ecosystem Services Benefits.
    Poder TG; Dupras J; Fetue Ndefo F; He J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0158901. PubMed ID: 27513558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services: a distance decay approach to quantify willingness to pay for improvements in Heihe River Basin ecosystems.
    Khan SU; Khan I; Zhao M; Chien H; Lu Q; Ali MAS; Khan AA; Fahad S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Aug; 26(24):25247-25261. PubMed ID: 31256403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating water user demand for certification of forest watershed services.
    Jaung W; Bull GQ; Sumaila UR; Markum ; Putzel L
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Apr; 212():469-478. PubMed ID: 29459339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The value of forest water purification ecosystem services in Costa Rica.
    Piaggio M; Siikamäki J
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 789():147952. PubMed ID: 34058576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developing markets for forest environmental services: an opportunity for promoting equity while securing efficiency?
    Landell-Mills N
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1817-25. PubMed ID: 12460500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Water ecosystem services in northern Australia--how much are they worth and who should pay for their provision?
    Zander KK; Parkes R; Straton A; Garnett ST
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e64411. PubMed ID: 23717611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Addressing disturbance risk to mountain forest ecosystem services.
    Stritih A; Bebi P; Rossi C; Grêt-Regamey A
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Oct; 296():113188. PubMed ID: 34225045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.