These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26661337)

  • 1. Alternating between pro- and antisaccades: switch-costs manifest via decoupling the spatial relations between stimulus and response.
    Heath M; Gillen C; Samani A
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):853-65. PubMed ID: 26661337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repetitive antisaccade execution does not increase the unidirectional prosaccade switch-cost.
    Weiler J; Heath M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Feb; 146():67-72. PubMed ID: 24412836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The unidirectional prosaccade switch-cost: electroencephalographic evidence of task-set inertia in oculomotor control.
    Weiler J; Hassall CD; Krigolson OE; Heath M
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 278():323-9. PubMed ID: 25453741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oculomotor task switching: alternating from a nonstandard to a standard response yields the unidirectional prosaccade switch-cost.
    Weiler J; Heath M
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Nov; 112(9):2176-84. PubMed ID: 25122700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The unidirectional prosaccade switch-cost: correct and error antisaccades differentially influence the planning times for subsequent prosaccades.
    DeSimone JC; Weiler J; Aber GS; Heath M
    Vision Res; 2014 Mar; 96():17-24. PubMed ID: 24412739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pro- and antisaccade task-switching: response suppression-and not vector inversion-contributes to a task-set inertia.
    Tari B; Heath M
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 237(12):3475-3484. PubMed ID: 31741001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task-switching effects for visual and auditory pro- and antisaccades: evidence for a task-set inertia.
    Heath M; Starrs F; Macpherson E; Weiler J
    J Mot Behav; 2015; 47(4):319-27. PubMed ID: 25584657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response suppression produces a switch-cost for spatially compatible saccades.
    Tari B; Fadel MA; Heath M
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 May; 237(5):1195-1203. PubMed ID: 30809706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task-switching in oculomotor control: unidirectional switch-cost when alternating between pro- and antisaccades.
    Weiler J; Heath M
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Nov; 530(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 23063688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antisaccades and task-switching: interactions in controlled processing.
    Cherkasova MV; Manoach DS; Intriligator JM; Barton JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jun; 144(4):528-37. PubMed ID: 12037637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The unidirectional prosaccade switch-cost: no evidence for the passive dissipation of an oculomotor task-set inertia.
    Tari B; Edgar C; Persaud P; Dalton C; Heath M
    Exp Brain Res; 2022 Aug; 240(7-8):2061-2071. PubMed ID: 35727365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm.
    Barton JJ; Greenzang C; Hefter R; Edelman J; Manoach DS
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):76-87. PubMed ID: 16096781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural processes associated with antisaccade task performance investigated with event-related FMRI.
    Ford KA; Goltz HC; Brown MR; Everling S
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 94(1):429-40. PubMed ID: 15728770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The antisaccade task: Vector inversion contributes to a statistical summary representation of target eccentricities.
    Heath M; Gillen C; Weiler J
    J Vis; 2015; 15(4):4. PubMed ID: 26053143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The prior-antisaccade effect influences the planning and online control of prosaccades.
    Weiler J; Heath M
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Feb; 216(4):545-52. PubMed ID: 22120158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response suppression delays the planning of subsequent stimulus-driven saccades.
    Weiler J; Mitchell T; Heath M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86408. PubMed ID: 24466076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trial-type probability and task-switching effects on behavioral response characteristics in a mixed saccade task.
    Pierce JE; McCardel JB; McDowell JE
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 233(3):959-69. PubMed ID: 25537465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Simon Effect With Saccadic Eye Movements.
    Lugli L; Baroni G; Nicoletti R; Umiltà C
    Exp Psychol; 2016 Mar; 63(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 27221601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task-switching with antisaccades versus no-go trials: a comparison of inter-trial effects.
    Barton JJ; Raoof M; Jameel O; Manoach DS
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 172(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 16369785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attention allocation before antisaccades.
    Klapetek A; Jonikaitis D; Deubel H
    J Vis; 2016; 16(1):11. PubMed ID: 26790843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.