These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26661857)

  • 1. Comparing Latent Means Without Mean Structure Models: A Projection-Based Approach.
    Deng L; Yuan KH
    Psychometrika; 2016 Sep; 81(3):802-29. PubMed ID: 26661857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement invariance via multigroup SEM: Issues and solutions with chi-square-difference tests.
    Yuan KH; Chan W
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):405-26. PubMed ID: 27266799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advances in Measurement Invariance and Mean Comparison of Latent Variables: Equivalence Testing and A Projection-Based Approach.
    Jiang G; Mai Y; Yuan KH
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1823. PubMed ID: 29114237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Type I error rates and power of several versions of scaled chi-square difference tests in investigations of measurement invariance.
    Brace JC; Savalei V
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):467-485. PubMed ID: 27893215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing consistency in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) across gender and stability of OHRQoL over time for adolescents using Structural Equation Modeling.
    Wong MC; Lau AW; Lam KF; McGrath C; Lu HX
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2011 Aug; 39(4):325-35. PubMed ID: 21198762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The chi-square test of independence.
    McHugh ML
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2013; 23(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 23894860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.
    Meredith W; Teresi JA
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. PubMed ID: 17060838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Goodness-of-Fit Testing for Latent Class Models.
    Collins LM; Fidler PL; Wugalter SE; Long JD
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1993 Jul; 28(3):375-89. PubMed ID: 26776893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A test of homogeneity of distributions when observations are subject to measurement errors.
    Lee D; Lahiri SN; Sinha S
    Biometrics; 2020 Sep; 76(3):821-833. PubMed ID: 31860740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What Causes the Mean Bias of the Likelihood Ratio Statistic with Many Variables?
    Yuan KH; Fan C; Zhao Y
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(6):840-855. PubMed ID: 30958035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Latent structure of irritable bowel syndrome symptom severity.
    Jasper F; Egloff B; Roalfe A; Witthöft M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jan; 21(1):292-300. PubMed ID: 25574104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistics for clinicians. 2. Nominal data (I).
    Nanivadekar AS; Kannappan AR
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1990 Dec; 38(12):931-5, 974. PubMed ID: 2096131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Small-sample adjustments in using the sandwich variance estimator in generalized estimating equations.
    Pan W; Wall MM
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1429-41. PubMed ID: 12185894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing groups on latent variables: a structural equation modeling approach.
    Dimitrov DM
    Work; 2006; 26(4):429-36. PubMed ID: 16788262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factorial validity, measurement equivalence and cognitive performance of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) between patients with first-episode psychosis and healthy volunteers.
    Haring L; Mõttus R; Koch K; Trei M; Maron E
    Psychol Med; 2015 Jul; 45(9):1919-29. PubMed ID: 25544472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Extension of the Propensity Score Adjustment Method for the Analysis of Group Differences in MIMIC Models.
    Kaplan D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1999 Oct; 34(4):467-92. PubMed ID: 26801637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A bootstrap test for comparing two variances: simulation of size and power in small samples.
    Sun J; Chernick MR; LaBudde RA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Nov; 21(6):1079-93. PubMed ID: 22023677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Internet-based and paper-based questionnaires in Taiwan using multisample invariance approach.
    Yu SC; Yu MN
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2007 Aug; 10(4):501-7. PubMed ID: 17711357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Shame and Guilt Scales of the Test of Self-Conscious Affect-Adolescent (TOSCA-A): Factor Structure, Concurrent and Discriminant Validity, and Measurement and Structural Invariance Across Ratings of Males and Females.
    Watson S; Gomez R; Gullone E
    Assessment; 2017 Jun; 24(4):517-527. PubMed ID: 26450945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in French clinical and nonclinical adults.
    Morin AJ; Moullec G; Maïano C; Layet L; Just JL; Ninot G
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2011 Oct; 59(5):327-40. PubMed ID: 21925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.