194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26662032)
1. Effect of display type and room illuminance in chest radiographs.
Liukkonen E; Jartti A; Haapea M; Oikarinen H; Ahvenjärvi L; Mattila S; Nevala T; Palosaari K; Perhomaa M; Nieminen MT
Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3171-9. PubMed ID: 26662032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between DICOM-calibrated and uncalibrated consumer grade and 6-MP displays under different lighting conditions in panoramic radiography.
Kallio-Pulkkinen S; Haapea M; Liukkonen E; Huumonen S; Tervonen O; Nieminen MT
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(5):20140365. PubMed ID: 25564888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of display type, DICOM calibration and room illuminance in bitewing radiographs.
Kallio-Pulkkinen S; Huumonen S; Haapea M; Liukkonen E; Sipola A; Tervonen O; Nieminen MT
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(1):20150129. PubMed ID: 26234536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Accuracy of Caries and Periapical Lesions on a Monitor with and without DICOM-GSDF Calibration Under Different Ambient Light Conditions.
Freire RT; Prata-Júnior AR; Pinho JNA; Takeshita WM
J Digit Imaging; 2022 Jun; 35(3):654-659. PubMed ID: 35166971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of medical-grade and calibrated consumer-grade displays for diagnosis of subtle bone fissures.
Pinto Dos Santos D; Welter J; Emrich T; Jungmann F; Dappa E; Mildenberger P; Kloeckner R
Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5049-5055. PubMed ID: 28660305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ROC study of four LCD displays under typical medical center lighting conditions.
Langer S; Fetterly K; Mandrekar J; Harmsen S; Bartholmai B; Patton C; Bishop A; McCannel C
J Digit Imaging; 2006 Mar; 19(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 16249836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of three pneumothorax size quantification methods on digitized chest X-ray films using medical-grade grayscale and consumer-grade color displays.
Salazar AJ; Aguirre DA; Ocampo J; Camacho JC; Díaz XA
J Digit Imaging; 2014 Apr; 27(2):280-6. PubMed ID: 24149967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of observer performance on soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: high resolution liquid-crystal display monitors versus cathode-ray tube monitors.
Park CM; Lee HJ; Goo JM; Han DH; Kim JH; Lim KY; Kim SH; Kang JJ; Kim KG; Lee CH; Chun EJ; Im JG
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 66(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17689217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Introduction to grayscale calibration and related aspects of medical imaging grade liquid crystal displays.
Fetterly KA; Blume HR; Flynn MJ; Samei E
J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):193-207. PubMed ID: 17333412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DICOM gray-scale standard display function: clinical diagnostic accuracy of chest radiography in medical-grade gray-scale and consumer-grade color displays.
Salazar AJ; Aguirre DA; Ocampo J; Camacho JC; Díaz XA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jun; 202(6):1272-80. PubMed ID: 24848825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of ambient lighting in chest radiology reading rooms.
Pollard BJ; Samei E; Chawla AS; Beam C; Heyneman LE; Koweek LM; Martinez-Jimenez S; Washington L; Hashimoto N; McAdams HP
J Digit Imaging; 2012 Aug; 25(4):520-6. PubMed ID: 22349990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: effect of ambient light and automatic optimization of monitor luminance.
Uffmann M; Prokop M; Kupper W; Mang T; Fiedler V; Schaefer-Prokop C
Invest Radiol; 2005 Mar; 40(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 15714093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of consumer grade, tablet and 6MP-displays: observer performance in detection of anatomical and pathological structures in panoramic radiographs.
Kallio-Pulkkinen S; Haapea M; Liukkonen E; Huumonen S; Tervonen O; Nieminen MT
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Jul; 118(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 24908604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of digitized chest X-rays using consumer-grade color displays for low-cost teleradiology services: a multireader-multicase comparison.
Salazar AJ; Aguirre DA; Ocampo J; Diaz XA; Camacho JC
Telemed J E Health; 2014 Apr; 20(4):304-11. PubMed ID: 24506568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of ambient light level at the monitor surface on digital radiographic evaluation of approximal carious lesions: an in vitro study.
Hellén-Halme K; Lith A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Mar; 41(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 22378753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Color standard display function: A proposed extension of DICOM GSDF.
Kimpe T; Rostang J; Van Hoey G; Xthona A
Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5009. PubMed ID: 27587031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of varying displays and room illuminance on caries diagnostic accuracy in digital dental radiographs.
Pakkala T; Kuusela L; Ekholm M; Wenzel A; Haiter-Neto F; Kortesniemi M
Caries Res; 2012; 46(6):568-74. PubMed ID: 22947623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated medical grade monitor vs a DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated "commercial off-the-shelf" (COTS) monitor for viewing 8-bit dental images.
McIlgorm DJ; McNulty JP
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(3):20140148. PubMed ID: 25421807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of 'commercial-off-the-shelf' (COTS) monitors displaying dental radiographs.
McIlgorm DJ; Lawinski C; Ng S; McNulty JP
Br Dent J; 2013 Dec; 215(11):E22. PubMed ID: 24309815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Viewing angle performance of medical liquid crystal displays.
Samei E; Wright SL
Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):645-54. PubMed ID: 16878568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
