These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26663413)

  • 1. Female discrimination thresholds frequently exceed local male display variation: implications for mate choice dynamics and sexual selection.
    Höbel G
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Mar; 29(3):572-82. PubMed ID: 26663413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inferred Attractiveness: A generalized mechanism for sexual selection that can maintain variation in traits and preferences over time.
    DuVal EH; Fitzpatrick CL; Hobson EA; Servedio MR
    PLoS Biol; 2023 Oct; 21(10):e3002269. PubMed ID: 37788233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.
    Snow SS; Alonzo SH; Servedio MR; Prum RO
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 30817033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct fitness benefits explain mate preference, but not choice, for similarity in heterozygosity levels.
    Zandberg L; Gort G; van Oers K; Hinde CA
    Ecol Lett; 2017 Oct; 20(10):1306-1314. PubMed ID: 28868784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interplay between male quality and male-female compatibility across episodes of sexual selection.
    Mahdjoub H; Khelifa R; Roy J; Sbilordo SH; Zeender V; Perdigón Ferreira J; Gourgoulianni N; Lüpold S
    Sci Adv; 2023 Sep; 9(39):eadf5559. PubMed ID: 37774022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple signals and male spacing affect female preference at cocktail parties in treefrogs.
    Richardson C; Lengagne T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Apr; 277(1685):1247-52. PubMed ID: 20018785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Females alter their mate preferences depending on hybridization risk.
    Calabrese GM; Pfennig KS
    Biol Lett; 2022 Nov; 18(11):20220310. PubMed ID: 36382373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensory biases in response to novel complex acoustic signals in male and female grey treefrogs,
    Reichert MS; de la Hera I
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Oct; 289(1984):20221306. PubMed ID: 36196544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mate Discrimination Using Chemical Cues by Male Guppies.
    Saoshiro S; Karino K
    Zoolog Sci; 2023 Oct; 40(5):341-347. PubMed ID: 37818882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The complexity of mating decisions in stalk-eyed flies.
    Chapman NC; Siriwat P; Howie J; Towlson A; Bellamy L; Fowler K; Pomiankowski A
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Sep; 7(17):6659-6668. PubMed ID: 28904748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sound transmission and the recognition of temporally degraded sexual advertisement signals in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).
    Kuczynski MC; Vélez A; Schwartz JJ; Bee MA
    J Exp Biol; 2010 Aug; 213(Pt 16):2840-50. PubMed ID: 20675554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapid adaptation to mammalian sociality via sexually selected traits.
    Nelson AC; Colson KE; Harmon S; Potts WK
    BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Apr; 13():81. PubMed ID: 23577674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When less is more: coy display behaviours and the temporal dynamics of animal courtship.
    MacGillavry T; Spezie G; Fusani L
    Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Oct; 290(2008):20231684. PubMed ID: 37788700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual selection and mate limitation shape evolution of species' range limits.
    Tschol M; Reid JM; Bocedi G
    Evolution; 2024 May; 78(5):951-963. PubMed ID: 38416475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of female dominance hierarchies in the mating behaviour of mosquitofish.
    Chen T; Beekman M; Ward AJ
    Biol Lett; 2011 Jun; 7(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 21123247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Partitioning variance in a signaling trade-off under sexual selection reveals among-individual covariance in trait allocation.
    Reichert MS; de la Hera I; Moiron M
    Evolution; 2024 May; 78(6):1150-1160. PubMed ID: 38525953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strength of female mate preferences in temperature manipulation study supports the signal reliability hypothesis.
    Cobb NE; Mason SM; Tompkins K; Fitschen-Brown M; Rios-Cardenas O; Morris MR
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0303691. PubMed ID: 38843264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of female preference intensity on the permissiveness of sexual trait polymorphisms.
    Ponkshe A; Endler JA
    Ecol Evol; 2018 May; 8(9):4518-4524. PubMed ID: 29760892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Female house mice avoid fertilization by t haplotype incompatible males in a mate choice experiment.
    Manser A; König B; Lindholm AK
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Jan; 28(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 25494878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hot or not: the effects of exogenous testosterone on female attractiveness to male conspecifics in the budgerigar.
    Lahaye SE; Eens M; Darras VM; Pinxten R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e74005. PubMed ID: 23951365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.