These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26663413)
1. Female discrimination thresholds frequently exceed local male display variation: implications for mate choice dynamics and sexual selection. Höbel G J Evol Biol; 2016 Mar; 29(3):572-82. PubMed ID: 26663413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems. Gerhardt HC Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modality interactions alter the shape of acoustic mate preference functions in gray treefrogs. Reichert MS; Höbel G Evolution; 2015 Sep; 69(9):2384-98. PubMed ID: 26282702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Jennions MD; Petrie M Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mating preference functions of individual female barking treefrogs, Hyla gratiosa, for two properties of male advertisement calls. Murphy CG; Gerhardt HC Evolution; 2000 Apr; 54(2):660-9. PubMed ID: 10937241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness. Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Glucocorticoid-Mediated Changes in Male Green Treefrog Vocalizations Alter Attractiveness to Females. Leary CJ; Crocker-Buta S; Holloway A; Kennedy JGC Integr Comp Biol; 2021 Jul; 61(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 33940612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Elevated stress hormone diminishes the strength of female preferences for acoustic signals in the green treefrog. Davis AG; Leary CJ Horm Behav; 2015 Mar; 69():119-22. PubMed ID: 25644312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sexual selection on Drosophila serrata male pheromones does not vary with female age or mating status. Gershman S; Delcourt M; Rundle HD J Evol Biol; 2014 Jun; 27(6):1279-86. PubMed ID: 24828752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stronger convex (stabilizing) selection on homologous sexual display traits in females than in males: a multipopulation comparison in Drosophila serrata. Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):893-9. PubMed ID: 21361917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles. Fedina TY; Lewis SM Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting. Chaine AS; Lyon BE Science; 2008 Jan; 319(5862):459-62. PubMed ID: 18218896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection. Brooks R; Endler JA Evolution; 2001 Aug; 55(8):1644-55. PubMed ID: 11580024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Progesterone and prostaglandin F2α induce species-typical female preferences for male sexual displays in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis). Ward JL; Love EK; Baugh AT; Gordon NM; Tanner JC; Bee MA Physiol Behav; 2015 Dec; 152(Pt A):280-7. PubMed ID: 26454212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sexy males and choosy females on exploded leks: correlates of male attractiveness in the Little Bustard. Jiguet F; Bretagnolle V Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():246-55. PubMed ID: 24440985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mate Preferences and Choosiness Are Distinct Components of Mate Choice in Eastern Gray Treefrogs ( Feagles O; Höbel G Am Nat; 2022 Oct; 200(4):506-517. PubMed ID: 36150198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes. Houle D; Kondrashov AS Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jan; 269(1486):97-104. PubMed ID: 11788042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test. Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A multivariate analysis of genetic variation in the advertisement call of the gray treefrog, Hyla versicolor. Welch AM; Smith MJ; Gerhardt HC Evolution; 2014 Jun; 68(6):1629-39. PubMed ID: 24621402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences: mating assurance in a variable environment. Fowler-Finn KD; Rodríguez RL Evolution; 2012 Feb; 66(2):459-68. PubMed ID: 22276541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]