These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26663413)

  • 21. Non-random mating and information theory.
    Carvajal-Rodríguez A
    Theor Popul Biol; 2018 Mar; 120():103-113. PubMed ID: 29391186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sexual selection is influenced by both developmental and adult environments.
    Gillespie SR; Scarlett Tudor M; Moore AJ; Miller CW
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3421-32. PubMed ID: 25226860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On the architecture of mate choice decisions: preference functions and choosiness are distinct traits.
    Neelon DP; Rodríguez RL; Höbel G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Feb; 286(1897):20182830. PubMed ID: 30963823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Glucocorticoids, male sexual signals, and mate choice by females: Implications for sexual selection.
    Leary CJ; Baugh AT
    Gen Comp Endocrinol; 2020 Mar; 288():113354. PubMed ID: 31830474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An evolutionary limit to male mating success.
    McGuigan K; Van Homrigh A; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1528-37. PubMed ID: 18363864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Larger females are choosier in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor).
    Kuczynski MC; Getty T; Gering E
    Behav Processes; 2017 Feb; 135():29-35. PubMed ID: 27913165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Indirect mate choice, direct mate choice and species recognition in a bower-building cichlid fish lek.
    Genner MJ; Young KA; Haesler MP; Joyce DA
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 18547351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sexual pair-formation in a cicada mediated by acoustic behaviour of females and positive phonotaxis of males.
    Hou Z; Luo C; Roberts JD; Wei C
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6453. PubMed ID: 28743920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Female mate preference and sexual conflict: females prefer males that have had fewer consorts.
    Harris WE; Moore PJ
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S64-71. PubMed ID: 15795863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nineteen Years of Consistently Positive and Strong Female Mate Preferences despite Individual Variation.
    Ryan MJ; Akre KL; Baugh AT; Bernal XE; Lea AM; Leslie C; Still MB; Wylie DC; Rand AS
    Am Nat; 2019 Aug; 194(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 31318282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Positive-to-negative behavioural responses suggest hedonic evaluation in treefrog mate choice.
    Höbel G; Rodríguez RL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Jan; 289(1967):20211822. PubMed ID: 35042417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Inbreeding and advertisement calling in the cricket Teleogryllus commodus: laboratory and field experiments.
    Drayton JM; Milner RN; Hunt J; Jennions MD
    Evolution; 2010 Oct; 64(10):3069-83. PubMed ID: 20662924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contemporary sexual selection does not explain variation in male display traits among populations.
    Watts JC; Flynn A; Tenhumberg B; Hebets EA
    Evolution; 2019 Sep; 73(9):1927-1940. PubMed ID: 31343745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Females sample more males at high nesting densities, but ultimately obtain less attractive mates.
    Tinghitella RM; Stehle C; Boughman JW
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Sep; 15():200. PubMed ID: 26385337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Female Choice or Male Sex Drive? The Advantages of Male Body Size during Mating in Drosophila Melanogaster.
    Jagadeeshan S; Shah U; Chakrabarti D; Singh RS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144672. PubMed ID: 26658421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Selection for relative brain size affects context-dependent male preference for, but not discrimination of, female body size in guppies.
    Corral-López A; Kotrschal A; Kolm N
    J Exp Biol; 2018 Jun; 221(Pt 12):. PubMed ID: 29739831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences.
    Cotton S; Small J; Pomiankowski A
    Curr Biol; 2006 Sep; 16(17):R755-65. PubMed ID: 16950102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.