These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26663963)

  • 21. Reproducibility of clinical attachment level and probing depth of a manual probe and a computerized electronic probe.
    Alves Rde V; Machion L; Andia DC; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2005 Jan; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15736893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reproducibility and validity of the assessment of clinical furcation parameters as related to different probes.
    Eickholz P; Kim TS
    J Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 69(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 9579619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Histological location of a standardized periodontal probe in man.
    Aguero A; Garnick JJ; Keagle J; Steflik DE; Thompson WO
    J Periodontol; 1995 Mar; 66(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 7776162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radiographic parameters for prognosis of periodontal healing of infrabony defects: two different definitions of defect depth.
    Eickholz P; Hörr T; Klein F; Hassfeld S; Kim TS
    J Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 75(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 15088878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Periodontal disease in pregnancy complicated by type 1 diabetes mellitus.
    Guthmiller JM; Hassebroek-Johnson JR; Weenig DR; Johnson GK; Kirchner HL; Kohout FJ; Hunter SK
    J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1485-90. PubMed ID: 11759859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reproducibility of Probing Depth Measurements Using a Constant-Force Electronic Probe: Analysis of Inter- and Intraexaminer Variability.
    Araujo MWB; Benedek KM; Benedek JR; Grossi SG; Dorn J; Wactawski-Wende J; Genco RJ; Trevisan M
    J Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 74(12):1736-1740. PubMed ID: 29539079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Periodontal probing.
    Hefti AF
    Crit Rev Oral Biol Med; 1997; 8(3):336-56. PubMed ID: 9260047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In-vitro accuracy and reproducibility evaluation of probing depth measurements of selected periodontal probes.
    Al Shayeb KN; Turner W; Gillam DG
    Saudi Dent J; 2014 Jan; 26(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 24526824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Enamel matrix derivative versus bioactive ceramic filler in the treatment of intrabony defects: 12-month results.
    Leknes KN; Andersen KM; Bøe OE; Skavland RJ; Albandar JM
    J Periodontol; 2009 Feb; 80(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 19186961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stent as an accessory tool in periodontal measurements: An insight.
    Singh S; Vandana KL
    J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2019; 23(1):81-84. PubMed ID: 30692750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Periodontal surgery of vertical bony defects with or without synthetic bioabsorbable barriers. 12-month results.
    Eickholz P; Lenhard M; Benn DK; Staehle HJ
    J Periodontol; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1210-7. PubMed ID: 9848530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of manual and controlled-force attachment-level measurements.
    Reddy MS; Palcanis KG; Geurs NC
    J Clin Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 24(12):920-6. PubMed ID: 9442430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility of manual probing depth.
    Andrade R; Espinoza M; Gómez EM; Espinoza JR; Cruz E
    Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 22344339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reproducibility of automated periodontal probing around teeth and osseointegrated oral implants.
    Christensen MM; Joss A; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):455-64. PubMed ID: 9555204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Visual and tactile observational error: comparative probing reliability with recession and cementoenamel junction measurements.
    Watts TL
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1989 Dec; 17(6):310-2. PubMed ID: 2591184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of two pressure-sensitive periodontal probes and a manual periodontal probe in shallow and deep pockets.
    Rams TE; Slots J
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Dec; 13(6):520-9. PubMed ID: 8181912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of periodontal evaluation by cone-beam computed tomography, and clinical and intraoral radiographic examinations.
    Zhang W; Rajani S; Wang BY
    Oral Radiol; 2018 Sep; 34(3):208-218. PubMed ID: 30484028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A new periodontal probe with automated cemento-enamel junction detection.
    Jeffcoat MK; Jeffcoat RL; Jens SC; Captain K
    J Clin Periodontol; 1986 Apr; 13(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 3458724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. EDTA gel root conditioning: lack of effect on clinical and radiographic outcomes of intrabony defect treatment with enamel matrix derivative.
    Parashis AO; Tsiklakis K; Tatakis DN
    J Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 77(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 16579710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bioabsorbable membrane and bioactive glass in the treatment of intrabony defects in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis: results of a 12-month clinical and radiological study.
    Mengel R; Soffner M; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    J Periodontol; 2003 Jun; 74(6):899-908. PubMed ID: 12887004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.