These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26664045)

  • 1. Psychophysical basis for maximum pushing and pulling forces: A review and recommendations.
    Garg A; Waters T; Kapellusch J; Karwowski W
    Int J Ind Ergon; 2014 Mar; 44(2):281-291. PubMed ID: 26664045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychophysically determined forces of dynamic pushing for female industrial workers: Comparison of two apparatuses.
    Ciriello VM; Maikala RV; Dempsey PG; O'Brien NV
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jan; 41(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 19628201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maximum acceptable forces of dynamic pushing: comparison of two techniques.
    Ciriello VM; McGorry RW; Martin SE; Bezverkhny IB
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 9973870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Secular changes in psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces over 20 years for male industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM; Dempsey PG; Maikala RV; O'Brien NV
    Ergonomics; 2008 May; 51(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18432440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of handle height on lower-back loading in cart pushing and pulling.
    Lee KS; Chaffin DB; Herrin GD; Waikar AM
    Appl Ergon; 1991 Apr; 22(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 15676806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical loading of the low back and shoulders during pushing and pulling activities.
    Hoozemans MJ; Kuijer PP; Kingma I; van Dieën JH; de Vries WH; van der Woude LH; Veeger DJ; van der Beek AJ; Frings-Dresen MH
    Ergonomics; 2004 Jan; 47(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 14660215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender differences in psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces for industrial workers observed after twenty years.
    Ciriello VM; Maikala RV; Dempsey PG; O'Brien NV
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2011 Jun; 84(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 20953621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanically determined hand force limits protecting the low back during occupational pushing and pulling tasks.
    Weston EB; Aurand A; Dufour JS; Knapik GG; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2018 Jun; 61(6):853-865. PubMed ID: 29241415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pushing and pulling in relation to musculoskeletal disorders: a review of risk factors.
    Hoozemans MJ; van der Beek AJ; Frings-Dresen MH; van Dijk FJ; van der Woude LH
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):757-81. PubMed ID: 9629062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Force direction and physical load in dynamic pushing and pulling.
    de Looze MP; van Greuningen K; Rebel J; Kingma I; Kuijer PP
    Ergonomics; 2000 Mar; 43(3):377-90. PubMed ID: 10755660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximum strength levels for pulling and pushing handleless cartons in warehousing tasks.
    Chen YL; Ho TK; Chen KL
    Ergonomics; 2021 Sep; 64(9):1174-1182. PubMed ID: 33938408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Foot placement strategy in pushing and pulling.
    Lee TH
    Work; 2018; 59(2):243-247. PubMed ID: 29355122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effects of Ramp Gradients and Pushing-Pulling Techniques on Lumbar Spinal Load in Healthy Workers.
    Pinupong C; Jalayondeja W; Mekhora K; Bhuanantanondh P; Jalayondeja C
    Saf Health Work; 2020 Sep; 11(3):307-313. PubMed ID: 32995056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Initial force and postural adaptations when pushing and pulling on floor surfaces with good and reduced resistance to slipping.
    Boocock MG; Haslam RA; Lemon P; Thorpe S
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jul; 49(9):801-21. PubMed ID: 16801229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lower back muscle forces in pushing and pulling.
    Lee KS; Chaffin DB; Waikar AM; Chung MK
    Ergonomics; 1989 Dec; 32(12):1551-63. PubMed ID: 2534511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pushing and pulling: personal mechanics influence spine loads.
    Lett KK; McGill SM
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jul; 49(9):895-908. PubMed ID: 16801235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A thorough investigation on pushing activities in industry: The impact of the variation in the speed of motion and load conditions on initial and sustained forces.
    Botti L; Galizia FG; Mora C; Zecchi G
    Appl Ergon; 2020 May; 85():103080. PubMed ID: 32174340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Further studies of psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces.
    Ciriello VM; Snook SH; Hughes GJ
    Hum Factors; 1993 Mar; 35(1):175-86. PubMed ID: 8509102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determinants and magnitudes of manual force strengths and joint moments during two-handed standing maximal horizontal pushing and pulling.
    Chow AY; Dickerson CR
    Ergonomics; 2016 Apr; 59(4):534-44. PubMed ID: 26256837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.